Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Support for Administrative Decision Making in Technogenically Contaminated Territories on the Basis of a Risk Analysis Using Geoinformational Technology

  • Published:
Atomic Energy Aims and scope

Abstract

General questions concerning raisk analysis based decision-making support for the administration of contaminated territories are examined. The characteristics and capabilities of the PRANA applied geoinformation system for decision-making support, developed for controlling risk and rehabilitating radioactively contaminated territories, are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. C. Ferguson, D. Darmendrait, K. Freier, et al., Risk Assessment for Contaminated Sites in Europe (1998), Vol. 1, Scientific Basis, LQM Press, Nottingham, ISBN 0953309010.

  2. C. Ferguson and H. Kasamas, Risk Assessment for Contaminated Sites in Europe (1999), Vol. 2, Policy Frameworks, Report of the Caracas Project: Concerted Action on Risk Assessment of Contaminated Sites in the European Union, LQM Press, Nottingham. ISBN 0953309010.

  3. The International Chernobyl Project. Technical Report, IAEA, Vienna (1991).

  4. R. Bardos, C. Mariotti, and S. Nortcliff, “A framework and categorization of decision support tools used in contaminated land management across Europe,” in: Proceedings of International Conference ConSoil-2000, Leipzig, Germany, September 18- 22, 2000, pp. 169–170.

  5. S. French, Decision Theory: An Introduction to the Mathematics of Rationality, Ellis Horwood, Chichester (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. I. Yatsalo and R. M. Aleksakhin, “Methods for analyzing protective measures in agriculture: assessment of effectiveness, intervention levels, and comparison with various countermeasures,” Radiat. Biol. Radioékol., 37, No. 5, 114–124 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  7. V. F. Demin, “Scientific-methodological aspects of risk assessment,” At. Énerg., 86, No. 1, 46–63 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. F. Demin, V. Ya. Golikov, T. G. Sazykina, and B. I. Yatsalo, “Analysis of risk in making decisions concerning measures for radiation and social protection of the public,” ibid., 87, No. 5, 384–395.

  9. Intervention Criteria in a Nuclear or Radiation Emergency, Safety Series No. 109, IAEA, Vienna (1994).

  10. M. F. Kanevskii, I. E. Krayushkin, N A. Koptelova, at al., “Development of applied integrated systems in radioecology,” in: Problems of Safe Development of Nuclear Power, Nauka, Moscow (1993), pp. 165–195.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. V. Koz'min, S. V. Kruglov, A. A. Kurganov, et al., “Introduction to to agriculture under conditions of radioactive contamination,” Uchebn. Pos. Obninsk, OIATÉ (1999).

  12. B. I. Yatsalo, R. M. Aleksakhin, and O. A. Mirzeabasov, “Optimization of radiation protection in the agrosphere: methods and computer systems for decision-making support,” Radiat. Biol. Radioékol, 37, No. 4, 705–718 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. I. Yatsalo, O. A. Mirzeabasov, I. V. Okhrimenko, et al., “Support system for making decisions concerning the assessment of the effectiveness of protective measures in the atmosphere in a long-time period of liquidation of the consequences of a nuclear accident,” At. Énerg., 81, No. 5, 390–397 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  14. U. Baverstam, G. Fraser, and G. Kelly, “Decision-making support for off-site emergency management,” Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 73, No. 1- 4 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Management on the Implementation of Countermeasures in the Agriculture after a Nuclear Accident, IAEA-TECDOC-745, Vienna (1994).

  16. B. Yatsalo, O. Mirzeabassov, I. Okhrimenko, et al., “PRANA - decision support system for assessment of countermeasure strategy in the long-term period of liquidation of the consequencs of a nuclear accident (agrosphere),” Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 73, No. 1- 4, 291–294 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  17. B. Yatsalo, O. Mirzeabassov, I. Okhrimneko, et al., “Geographic information decision support system for rehabilitation of radioactive contaminated territories,” in: Proceedings of International Conference ConSoil-2000, Leipzig, Germany, September 18- 22, 2000, pp. 433–441.

  18. B. I. Yatsalo, O. A. Mirzeabasov, I. A. Pichugina, et al., “Geoinformation system for radioactively contaminated territory in the Bryansk oblast,” Vest. Ros. Akad. Sel'khoz. Nauk, 2, 46–47 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  19. B. Yatsalo, P. Hedemann-Jensen, and R. Alekhin, “Methodological approaches to analysis of agricultural countermeasures on radioactive contaminated areas: estimation of effectiveness and comparison of different alternatives,” Radiats. Prot. Dosim., 74, No. 1/2, 55–61 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Hedemann-Jensen and B. Yatsalo, “Methodology for determining action levels for clean-up of contaminated urband and agricultural environments,” Health Phys., 75, No. 2b, 120–129 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. M. Aleksakhin (ed.), Recommendations for Conducting Agriculture in a Territory Radioactively Contaminated as a Result of the Accident at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in 1991- 1995, Gosagroprom SSSR, Moscow (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  22. B. I. Yatsalo, “Can agricultural countermeasures lead to an increase in population doses?” in: Proceedings of the International Congress on Radiation Protection IRPA9, April 14- 19, 1996, Vol. 3, p. 256.

    Google Scholar 

  23. G. Kelly and G. Fraser, “Decision-making support for off-site emergency management,” Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 50, No. 2- 4 (1993).

  24. M. Morrey, S. Dovgiy, B. Yatsalo, et al., “Decision support systems for the post-emergency management of contaminated territories. The radiological consequences of the Chernobyl accident,” in: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference, Minsk, Belarus, March 18- 22, 1996, pp. 453–464.

  25. V. F. Demin, V. I. Didenko, and B. I. Yatsalo, “Radiation and nonradiation risk assessment on territories effected by the Chernobyl accident,” in: International Conference on Radioactivity from Nuclear Explosions and Accidents,” April 24- 26, 2000, Moscow, Gidrometeoizdat, St. Petersburg (2000), Vol. 3, pp. 250–254.

    Google Scholar 

  26. S. T. Belyaev, V. F. Demin, V. A. Kut'kov, and B. I. Yatsalo, “Analysis of the substantiation and effectiveness of protective measures on territories affected by the Chernobyl accident,” ibid., pp. 275–280.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. OIATÉ, Russia

    B. I. Yatsalo

  2. Russian Science Center Kurchatov Institute, Russia

    V. F. Demin

Authors
  1. B. I. Yatsalo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. F. Demin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yatsalo, B.I., Demin, V.F. Support for Administrative Decision Making in Technogenically Contaminated Territories on the Basis of a Risk Analysis Using Geoinformational Technology. Atomic Energy 93, 673–680 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021052900361

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021052900361

Keywords

Search

Navigation