Skip to main content
Log in

Institutionalized Conflict Resolution: Have We Come to Expect Too Little?

  • Published:
Negotiation Journal

Abstract

Two very different contexts of the conflict resolution field — hostage negotiation and court-connected mediation—do share many similarities, particularly with regard to roles, responsibilities, and techniques. In both contexts, the emphasis is on the short-term "fix," or solution, rather than attention to the underlying reasons for a conflict and long-term societal change. This emphasis, though perhaps changing in the international relations area, permeates much of the institutionalized conflict resolution field and bears further examination by practitioners and researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Welsh, N.A., Coleman, P.T. Institutionalized Conflict Resolution: Have We Come to Expect Too Little?. Negotiation Journal 18, 345–350 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021050105773

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021050105773

Keywords

Navigation