Abstract
I describe a laboratory system for investigating the role of light as a proximate cue for diel changes in locomotor activity and vertical location on the substrate of stream macro-invertebrates. The system consisted of computer-controlled halogen lamps positioned over a laboratory stream in which video-recordings were made of Stenonema modestum mayfly nymphs located on the undersides of unglazed tile substrates. Locomotor activity of study organisms in response to light changes were quantified during computer-programmed and reproducible light/dark (LD) cycles. The system provided the flexibility to simulate a variety of light environments so that the separate influences of light intensity and light change on diel activities of individuals and populations could be examined, which is difficult under natural light conditions. As a group, nymphs responded similarly to simulated twilight (light decrease from 7.9 × 102 to 6.9 × 10−2 μW cm−2 at a constant –1.9 × 10−3 s−1 rate of relative light change) and to natural twilight, suggesting that proposed mechanisms of light control of diel activities in nature can be adequately tested in the simulated environment. However, locomotor activity and vertical movements among individual mayflies were highly variable under controlled conditions, suggesting that physiological differences influence their responses to environmental conditions.
References
Allan, J. D., A. S. Flecker & N. L. McClintock, 1986. Diel epibenthic activity of mayfly nymphs, and its nonconcordance with behavioral drift. Limnol. Oceanogr. 31: 1057-1065.
Bishop, J. E., 1969. Light control of aquatic insect activity and drift. Ecology 50: 371-380.
Buchanan, C., B. Goldberg & R. McCartney, 1982. A laboratory method for studying zooplankton swimming behaviors. Hydrobiologia 94: 77-89.
Buchanan, C. & J. F. Haney, 1980. Vertical migration of zooplankton in the arctic. A test of environmental controls. Am. Soc. Limnol. Oceanogr. Special Symposium 3: 66-79.
Chaston, I., 1969. The light threshold controlling the periodicity of invertebrate drift. J. anim. Ecol. 38: 171-180.
Cowan, C. A. & B. L. Peckarsky, 1994. Diel feeding and positioning periodicity of a grazing mayfly in a trout stream and a fishless stream. Can. J. Fish aquat. Sci. 51: 450-459.
Daan, N. & J. Ringelberg, 1969. Further studies on the positive and negative phototactic reaction of Daphnia magna Straus, Neth. J. Zool. 19: 525-540.
Daan, S. & J. Aschoff, 1975. Circadian rhythms of locomotor activity in captive birds and mammals: their variations with season and latitude. Oecologia 18: 85-99.
Dill, L. M., 1987. Animal decision making and its ecological consequences: the future of aquatic ecology and behaviour. Can. J. Zool. 65: 803-811.
Elliott, J. M., 1968. The daily activity patterns of mayfly nymphs. (Ephemeroptera). J. Zool. 155: 201-221.
Flecker, A. S., 1992. Fish predation and the evolution of invertebrate drift periodicity: evidence from neotropical streams. Ecology 73: 438-448.
Forward R. B., 1985. Behavioral responses of larvae of the crab Rhithropanopeus harrisii (Brachyura: Xanthidae) during diel vertical migration. Mar. Biol. 90: 9-18.
Glozier, N. E. & J. M. Culp, 1989. Experimental investigations of diel vertical movements by lotic mayflies over substrate surfaces. Freshwat. Biol. 21: 253-260.
Grace, (now Schloss) A. L., 1990. Light control of the diel activity patterns of mayfly nymphs. Master's Thesis. University of New Hampshire, Durham.
Haney, J. F., T. R. Beaulieu, R. P. Berry, D. P. Mason, C. R. Miner, E. S. McLean, K. L Price, M. A. Trout, R. A. Vinton & S. J. Weiss, 1983. Light intensity and relative light change as factors regulating stream drift. Arch. Hydrobiol. 97: 73-88.
Haney, J. F., A. Craggy, K. Kimball & F. Weeks, 1990. Light control of evening vertical migrations by Chaoborus punctipennis larvae. Limnol. Oceanogr. 35: 1068-1078.
Heise, B., 1992. Sensitivity of mayfly nymphs to red light: implications for behavioral ecology. Freshwat. Biol. 28: 331-336.
Holt, C. S. & T. F. Waters, 1967. Effect of light intensity on the drift of stream invertebrates. Ecology 48: 225-234.
Kavanau, J. L. & C. R. Peters, 1976. Activity of nocturnal primates: Influences of twilight Zeitgebers and weather. Science 191: 83-86.
Kohler, S. L. 1984. Search mechanisms of a stream grazer in patchy environments: the role of food abundance. Oecologia (Berlin) 62: 209-218.
McIntosh, A. R. & C. R. Townsend, 1994. Interpopulation variation in mayfly antipredator tactics: differential effects of contrasting predatory fish. Ecology 75: 2078-2090.
Müller, K., 1966. Die tagesperiodik von Fliesswasserorganismen. Z Morph. Oekologische Tiere 56: 93-142.
Peckarsky, B. L., S. D. Cooper & A. R. McIntosh, 1997. Extrapolating from individual behavior to populations and communities in streams. J. n. am. benthol. Soc. 16: 375-390.
Rasband, W. S. & D. S. Bright, 1996. NIH Image, A public domain image-processing program for the Macintosh, V. 1.61, http://rsb.info.nih.gov/NIH-image/Defa ult.html.
Ringelberg, J., 1964. The positively phototactive reaction of Daphnia magna Straus. Neth. J. Sea Res. 2: 319-406.
Ringelberg, J., 1991. A mechanism of predator-mediated induction of diel vertical migration in Daphnia hyalina. J. Plankton Res. 13: 83-89.
Ringelberg, J., 1999. The photobehavior ofDaphnia spp. as a model to explain diel vertical migration in zooplankton. Biol. Rev. 74: 397-423.
Ringelberg, J., B. J. G. Flik, D. Lindenaar & K. Royackers, 1991. Diel vertical migration of Daphnia hyalina (sensu latiori) in Lake Maarsseveen: Part 1. Aspects of seasonal and daily timing. Arch. Hydrobiol. 121: 129-145.
Scrimgeour, G. J., J. M. Culp & K. J. Cash, 1994. Anti-predator responses of mayfly larvae to conspecific and predator stimuli. J. n. am. benthol. Soc. 13: 299-309.
Spaak, P. & J. Ringelberg, 1997. Differential behavior and shifts in genotype composition during the beginning of a seasonal period of diel vertical migration. Hydrobiologia 360: 177-185
Stearns, D. E. & R. B. Forward, 1984. Copepod photobehavior in a simulated natural light environment and its relation to nocturnal vertical migration. Mar. Biol. 82: 91-100.
Swift, M. C. & R. B. Forward, 1988. Absolute light intensity vs. rate of relative change in light intensity: the role of light in the vertical migration of Chaoborus punctipennis larvae. Bull. Mar. Sci. 43: 604-619.
Van Gool, E. & J. Ringelberg, 1997. The effect of accelerations in light increase on the phototactic downward swimming of Daphnia and the relevance to diel vertical migration. J. Plankton Res. 19: 2041-2050.
Waters, T. F., 1972. The drift of stream insects. Ann. Rev. Ent. 17: 253-272.
Wetzel, R. G., 1983. Limnology, 2nd edn. CBS College Publ., New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schloss, A.L. A laboratory system for examining the influence of light on diel activity of stream macro-invertebrates. Hydrobiologia 479, 181–190 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021046431482
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021046431482