Skip to main content

Blatant Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance: Self-Handicapping as a Strategic Means to Cope with Obtrusive Negative Performance Expectations

Abstract

Research on the effect of stereotype threat has consistently shown that a reduction of stereotype threat due to decreased salience of negative stereotypic expectations in testing situations results in a performance boost. This article reports on an experiment (n = 75 high school students) designed to test the impact of increased salience of negative stereotypic expectations on math performance. As expected, female participants in the condition of heightened salience of negative stereotypic expectations underperformed in comparison to their control group counterparts. Moreover, it was found that the effect of blatant stereotype threat resulted in increased self-handicapping tendencies in women, which in turn led to significantly impaired math performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

REFERENCES

  • Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. (1995). Environmental input to the development of sex-related differences in spatial and mathematical abilitiy. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 363-379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, R. D., & Kolakowski, D. (1973). Further evidence of sex-linked major-gene influence on human spatial visualizing ability. American Journal of Human Genetics, 25, 1-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broverman, D. M., Klaiber, E. L., Kobayashi, Y., & Vogel, W. (1968). Roles of activation and inhibition in sex differences in cognitive abilities. Psychological Review, 75, 23-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, M. B. (1996). Understanding individual differences in spatial ability within females: A nature/nurture interactionist framework. Developmental Review, 16, 241-260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheryan, S., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2000). When positive stereo-types threaten intellectual performance: The psychological hazards of “model minority” status. Psychological Science, 11, 399-402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clogg, C. C., Petkova, E., & Haritou, A. (1995). Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. Amer-ican Journal of Sociology, 100, 1261-1293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croizet, J.-C., & Claire, T. (1998). Extending the concept of stereo-type threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 588-594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S., & Licht, B. G. (1980). Learned helplessness and intel-lectual achievement. In J. Garber & M. E. P. Seligman (Eds.), Human helplessness: Theory and applications (pp. 197-221). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. I., et al. (1983). Expectations, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75-145). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennema E., & Peterson, P. (1985). Autonomous learning behavior: A possible explanation of gender-related differences in mathematics. In L. C. Wilkinson & C. B. Marrett (Eds.), Gender influences and classroom interaction (pp. 17-35). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C. (1996). Sexual selection and sex differences in math-ematical abilities. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 229-284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, R. L., Snyder, C. R., & Berglas, S. (Eds.). (1990). Self-handicapping: The paradox that isn't. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139-155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., & Berglas, S. C. (1978). Control of attributions about the self through self-handicapping strategies: The appeal of alcohol and the role of underachievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 200-206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J. (2002). Stereotype threat and women's math performance in an everyday setting: The effect of stereotype threat reduction in high school classrooms. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Keller, J., & Dauenheimer, D. (in press). Stereotype threat in the classroom: Dejection mediates the disrupting threat effect on women's math performance.

  • Keller, J., & Liebhauser, S. (2002). Stereotype threat and women's math performance: A test of mediating and moderating mechanisms. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 233-265). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J. (1976). Cerebral lateralization and spatial ability. Behavior Genetics, 6, 171-188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, O. M., & Kelly, D. L. (Eds.). (1996). Third International Mathematics and Science Study: Technical report. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Beaton, A. E., Gonzales, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. (1998). Mathematics and science achievement in the final year of secondary school: IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paglin, M., & Rufolo, A. M. (1990). Heterogeneous human capital, occupational choice, and male-female earnings differences. Journal of Labor Economics, 8, 123-144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, D. M., & Spencer, S. J. (2001). The interference of stereotype threat with women's generation of mathematical problem-solving strategies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 55-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African-Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797-811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, J., Lynch, C. I., Sjomeling, M., & Darley, J. M. (1999). Stereotype threat effects on Black and White athletic performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1213-1227.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keller, J. Blatant Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance: Self-Handicapping as a Strategic Means to Cope with Obtrusive Negative Performance Expectations. Sex Roles 47, 193–198 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021003307511

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021003307511

  • gender differences
  • math performance
  • self-handicapping
  • stereotype threat