Skip to main content
Log in

To Give or Not to Give: Modeling Individuals' Contribution Decisions

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Employing data from a recent national survey on campaign finance, we examine the contribution behavior of individual citizens in the 2000 election. By disaggregating types of contributions, our model enables us to observe potential heterogeneity in the determinants of giving money to parties and candidates. We find that for both types of contributions, the effects of informational resources and solicitation on the decision to contribute outweigh those of financial resources. In addition, we propose both a theoretical and an empirical distinction between the selection effects of solicitation and the stimulus effects of solicitation. By distinguishing between these dual dimensions of solicitation, our analysis provides new insight into the causal linkages between income, solicitation, and contributions. We find that while solicitation increases the likelihood of contributing through selective targeting or rational prospecting, it also does so through a stimulus mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Biersack, Robert, Herrnson, Paul S. and Wilcox, Clyde (1994). Risky Business? PAC Decisionmaking in Congressional Elections. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Tobin Grant, J. (1999). All in a day's work: the financial rewards of legislative effectiveness. Legislative Studies Quarterly 25(4): 511–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, Henry E., Schlozman, Kay Lehman and Verba, Sidney (1999). Prospecting for participants: rational expectations and the recruitment of political Activists. American Political Science Review 93(1): 153–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Clifford W., Powell, Lynda W. and Wilcox, Clyde (1995). Series Money: Fundraising and Contributing in Presidential Nomination Campaigns. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clawson, Dan, Neustadtl, Alan and Scott, Denise (1992). Money Talks: Corporate PACs and Political Influence. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Gary W., and Magar, Eric (1999). How much is majority status in the U.S. Congress worth?” American Political Science Review 93: 299–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotter, Cornelius, Gibson, James, Bibby, John, and Huckshorn, Robert (1984). Party Organization in American Politics. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, Delmer (1965). Policy preferences of party contributors and voters. Social Science Quarterly 55: 983–990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endersby, James and Munger, Michael C. (1992). The impact of legislator attributes on union PAC contributions. Journal of Labor Research 12: 79–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Diana (1988). Oil PACs and aggressive contribution strategies. The Journal of Politics 50: 1047–1056.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francia, Peter L., Goldberg, Rachel E., Green, John C., Herrnson, Paul S., and Wilcox, Clyde (1999). Individual donors in the 1996 federal elections. In John C. Green (ed.), Financing the 1996 Election. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gais, Thomas (1998). Improper Influence: Campaign Finance Law, Political Interest Groups, and the Problem of Equality. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopoian, J. David (1984). What makes PACs tick: an analysis of the allocation patterns of economic contributors. American Journal of Political Science 28: 259–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenzke, Janet (1989). Candidate attributes and PAC contributions. Western Political Quarterly 42: 245–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grier, Kevin B., and Munger, Michael C. (1993). Comparing interest group PAC contributions to House and Senate incumbents, 1980-1986. The Journal of Politics 55: 615–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grier, Kevin B., Munger, Michael C. and Roberts, Brian E. (1994). The determinants of industry political activity. American Political Science Review 88: 911–926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Richard, and Wayman, Frank (1990). Buying time: moneyed interests and the mobilization of bias in congressional committees. American Political Science Review 84(3): 797–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handler, Edward, and Mulkern, John (1982). Business in Politics: Campaign Strategies of Corporate Political Action Committees. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnson, Paul S. (1988). Party Campaigning in the 1980s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnson, Paul S. (1989). National party decisionmaking, strategies, and resource distribution in congressional elections. Western Political Quarterly 42: 301–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Gary (1986). Party organization and campaign resources: republicans and democrats in 1982. Political Science Quarterly 100: 603–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Ruth, and Miller, Warren (1985). Financing campaigns: macro level innovation and micro level response. Western Political Quarterly 38: 187–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. Scott (1997). Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, Keith, and Romer, Thomas (1985). Patterns of PAC contributions to the 1980 campaigns for the U.S. House. Public Choice 47: 63–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstone, Steven J., and Hansen, John Mark (1993). Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, Thomas J. (1999). Corporate and labor PAC contributions in House elections: measuring the effects of majority party status. The Journal of Politics 61: 195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabato, Larry J. (1984). PAC Power: Inside the World of Political Action Committees. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, James M. (1990). Campaign contributions as investments: the U.S. House of Representatives, 1980-1986. Journal of Political Economy 98: 1195–1227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorauf, Frank J. (1988). Money in American Elections. Boston: Scott, Foresman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorauf, Frank J. (1992). Inside Campaign Finance: Myths and Realities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratmann, Thomas (1992). Are contributors rational? Untangling strategies of political action committees. Journal of Political Economy 100: 647–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theilmann, John, and Wilhite, Al (1991). Discrimination and Congressional Campaign Contributions. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman and Brady, Henry E. (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wawro, Gregory (2001). A panel probit analysis of campaign contributions and roll-call votes. American Journal of Political Science 45(3): 563–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, Clyde (1989). Organizational variables and the contribution behavior of large PACs. Political Behavior 11: 157–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite, Al, and Theilmann, John (1989). Campaign contributions by political parties: ideology vs. winning. Atlantic Economic Journal 17: 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, John R. (1985). PACs, contributions, and roll calls: an organizational perspective. American Political Science Review 79: 400–414.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grant, J.T., Rudolph, T.J. To Give or Not to Give: Modeling Individuals' Contribution Decisions. Political Behavior 24, 31–54 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020994921777

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020994921777

Navigation