Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Impact of Interruptions on Schedule Execution in Flexible Manufacturing Systems

  • Published:
International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Finite capacity scheduling software packages provide a detailed advance plan of production events. However, the execution of this advance plan is disrupted by a myriad of unanticipated interruptions, such as machine breakdowns, yield variations, and hot jobs. The alternatives available to respond to such interruptions include modifying the existing schedule, regenerating the complete schedule, or doing nothing and letting the production system gradually absorb the impact of the interruption. This article reports on a simulation study aimed at understanding the impact of an interruption on a schedule in order to build a knowledge base for intelligent selection of a response from a set of alternatives. The results of the experimental study are used to identify significant major factors and their interactions. The results are discussed to draw insights into the performance of a flexible manufacturing system following an interruption. The causes leading to particular performance anomalies are extensively discussed and mechanisms for propagation and absorption of the effect of interruptions in manufacturing systems are inferred. Practical implications for the development and implementation of schedules are deduced and areas for further research proposed. This study provides the groundwork necessary to proceed with the development of strategies for responding to interruptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bean, J. C., Birge, J. R., Mittenthal, J., and Noon, C. E., “Match-up Scheduling with Multiple Resources, Release Dates and Disruptions,” Operations Research, Vol. 39, No.3, pp. 470–483 (May–June 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang,Y. L., Sullivan, R. S., and Bagchi, U., “Experimental Investigation of Quasi Realtime Scheduling in Flexible Manufacturing Systems,” Proceedings of the First ORSA/TIMS Conference on Flexible Manufacturing Systems, K. E. Stecke and Rajan Suri (Eds.), Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 307–312 (August 1984).

  • Filip, F. G., Neagu, G., and Donciulescu, D. A., “Job Shop Scheduling Optimization in Real-time Production Control,” Computers in Industry, Vol. 4, No.4, pp. 395–403 (October 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, W. J., Jain, S., and Haddock, J., “Using Simulation Generators for Modeling Manufacturing Systems,” Progress in Simulation, J. V. Leonard and G. W. Zobrist (Eds.), Ablex, Norwood, NJ (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldratt, E. M., “Computerized Shop Floor Scheduling,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 26, No.3, pp. 443–455 (March 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadavi, K., Shahraray, M. S., and Voigt, K., “ReDS—A Dynamic Planning, Scheduling, and Control System for Manufacturing,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 9, No.4, pp. 332–344 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ip, W. H., “Rule-Based ARIMA Models for FMS,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 66, Nos.1–3, pp. 240–243 (April 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S., “Decision Framework for Interruption Handling in Flexible Manufacturing Systems.” Ph.D. dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Manivannan, S. and Banks, J., “Design of a Knowledge-Based On-Line Simulation System to Control a Manufacturing Shop Floor,” IIE Transactions, Vol. 24, No.3, pp. 72–83 (July 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhlemann, A. P., Lockett, A. G., and Farn, C. K., “Job Shop Scheduling Heuristics and Frequency of Scheduling,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 20, No.2, pp. 227–241 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Narasimhan, R., Batta, R., and Karwan, M. H., “Routing Automated Guided Vehicles in the Presence of Interruptions,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 37, No.3, pp. 653–681 (February 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Keefe, R. M. and Haddock, J., “Data-driven Generic Simulators for Flexible Manufacturing Systems,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 29, No.9, pp. 1795–1810 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Reilly, J. J. and Lilegdon, W. R., “Introduction to FACTOR/AIM,” 1999 Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings, P. A. Farrington, H. B. Nembhard, D. T. Sturrock, and G. W. Evans (Eds.), pp. 201–207 (December 1999).

  • Parunak, H. V. D., “Characterizing the Manufacturing Scheduling Problem,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 10, No.3, pp. 241–259 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, T., “Autosched AP by Autosimulations,” 1998 Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings, D. J. Medeiros, E. F. Watson, J. S. Carson, and M.S. Manivannan (Eds.), pp. 219–222 (December 1998).

  • Samadi, B., Morris, R. J. T., Rubin, L. D., Wong, W. S., and Ekroot, B. C., “The Operations Assistant: A New Manufacturing Resource Management Tool,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 9, No.4, pp. 303–314 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc., SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5 Edition, SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. L., Ramesh, R., Dudek, R. A., and Blair, E. Z., “Characteristics of U.S. Flexible Manufacturing Systems—A Survey,” Proceedings of the Second ORSA/TIMS Conference on Flexible Manufacturing Systems: Operations Research Models and Applications, K. E. Stecke and R. Suri (Eds.), Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, pp. 477–486 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sule, D. R., “Heuristic Method of a Single Machine Scheduling Problem,” International Journal of Industrial Engineering—Applications and Practice, Vol. 1, pp. 167–174 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suri, R. and Whitney, C. K., “Decision Support Requirements in Flexible Manufacturing,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 3, pp. 61–69 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tayanithi, P., Manivannan, S., and Banks, J., “A Knowledge-Based Simulation Architecture to Analyze Interruptions in a Flexible Manufacturing System,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 11, No.3, pp. 195–214 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tayanithi, P., Manivannan, S., and Banks, J., “Complexity Reduction During Interruption Analysis in a Flexible Manufacturing System using Knowledge-Based On-Line Simulation,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 12, No.2, pp. 153–169 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmann, T. E., Berry, W. L., and Whybark, D. C., Manufacturing Planning and Control Systems (4th ed.), Irwin/McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 540–545 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Alexandria Research Institute, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 206 N. Washington Street, Suite 400, Alexandria, VA, 22314, USA

    Sanjay Jain

  2. Decision Sciences and Engineering Systems, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, 12180-3590, USA

    William J. Foley

Authors
  1. Sanjay Jain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William J. Foley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jain, S., Foley, W.J. Impact of Interruptions on Schedule Execution in Flexible Manufacturing Systems. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 14, 319–344 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020952823369

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020952823369

Search

Navigation