Abstract
Global governance and sustainable development may be at odds with each other if the former implies highly centralized forms of natural resource management. Proponents of international regulation of trade in animal and plant parts argue that the dictates of environmental necessity outweigh the concerns of those to whom this regulation represents a fundamental imposition upon their way of life and economic opportunities. More specifically, such regulation (represented primarily by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species) is necessary because the value of biodiversity must supersede that of cultural tradition and economic opportunity costs associated with either refraining from trade or enforcing trade bans/regulation. Critics charge this is a western-oriented approach that fails to take into account the need for international trade in order to sustain local enthusiasm for trade limitations in southern states and amongst indigenous communities in the south. This paper will analyze this debate, with reference to CITES, and suggest that the need for habitat protection may be the only way to close the divide between hardened ideological positions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berger, J. (2001), 'The African Elephant, Human Economies and International Law: Bridging the Great Rift for East and Southern Africa', Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 13(2), 417–461.
Borroni-Feyerabend, G. (1996), Collaborative Management of Protected Areas: Tailoring the Approach to the Context.Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
Brown, G. and J. H. Goldstein (1984), 'A Model for Valuing Endangered Species', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 11(4), 303–309.
Burns, W. (2001), 'From the Harpoon to the Heat: Climate Change and the International Whaling Commission in the 21st Century', Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 13(2), 335–359.
Carson, R. T. (1998), 'Valuation of Tropical Rainforests: Philosophical and Practical Issues in the Use of Contingent Valuation', Ecological Economics 24(1), 15–29.
Caron, D. (1995), 'The International Whaling Commission and the North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission: The Institutional Risks of Coercion in Consensual Structures', American Journal of International Law 89, 154–171.
Conca, K. (1995), 'Environmental Protection, International Norms, and State Sovereignty: The Case of the Brazilian Amazon', in G. Lyons and M. Mastanduno (eds.), Beyond Westphalia? State Sovereignty and International Intervention (pp. 147–169). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Costanza, R., S. C. Farber and J. Maxwell (1989), 'The Valuation and Management of Wetland Ecosystems', Ecological Economics 1, 335–362.
Crawford, C. (1995), 'Conflicts Between the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species and the GATT in Light of Actions to Halt the Rhinoceros and Tiger Trade', Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 7, 555–585.
DeGrazia, D. (1996), Taking Animals Seriously: Mental Life and Moral Status. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dobson, A. (ed.) (1999), Fairness and Futurity: Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford university Press.
Emberley, J. (1997), The Cultural Politics of Fur. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Favre, D. (1993), 'Debate Within the CITES Community: What Direction For the Future?', Natural Resources Journal 33, 875–888.
Freeman, M. (1997), 'Issues Affecting Subsistence Security in Arctic Societies', Arctic Anthropology 34(1), 7–17.
Freeman, M. and U. P. Kreuter (eds.) (1994), Elephants and Whales: Resources for Whom? Gordon and Breach Publishers.
Glennon, M. (1990), 'Has International Law Failed the Elephant?', The American Journal of International Law 84, 1–43.
Granadillo, E. (2000), 'Regulation of the International Trade of Endangered Species by the World Trade Organization', The George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics 32(3), 437–464.
Green, K. (1996), 'Two Distinctions in Environmental Goodness', Environmental Values 5, 31–46.
Heimert, A. (1995), 'How the Elephant Lost Its Tusks', Yale Law Journal 104(6), 1473.
Hill, K. (1990), 'The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species: Fifteen Years Later', Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Journal 13(2), 231–278.
Hepworth, R. (1998), 'The Independent Review of CITES', Journal of International Wildlife 1(3), 412–432.
Laferriere, E. and P. Stoett (1999), International Relations Theory and Ecological Thought: Toward a Synthesis. London: Routledge.
Lafferty, W. and J. Meadowcraft (2001), Implementing Sustainable Development: Strategies and Initiatives in High Consumption Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lynge, F. (1992), Arctic Wars: Animal Rights, Endangered Peoples. Hanover: University Press of New England.
Macauley, D. (1997), 'Be-Wildering Order', in R. Gottlieb (ed.), The Ecological Community (pp. 104–135). New York: Routledge.
Mulligan, S. and P. Stoett (2000), 'A Global Bioprospecting Regime: Partnership or Piracy?', International Journal LV(2), 224–246.
Naughton-Treves, L. and S. Sanderson (1995), 'Property, Politics and Wildlife Conservation', World Development 23(8), 1265–1275.
Palazzo, J. T. (1999), 'Whose Whales? Developing Countries and the Right to Use Whales by Non-Lethal Means', Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy 2(1), 69–78.
Pearce, D. and D. Moran (1994), Economic Value of Biodiversity. London: Earthscan.
Perrings, C., K. G. Maler, C. Folke, C. S. Holling and B.O. Jansson (eds.) (1995), Biodiversity Loss: Economic and Ecological Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sachs, W. (1999), Planet Dialectics: Explorations in Environment and Development.
Shyamsundar, P. and R. Kramer (1996), 'Tropical Forest Protection: An Empirical Analysis of the Costs Borne by Local People', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31(2),129–145.
Slocombe, D. (1989), 'CITES, the Wildlife Trade and Sustainable Development', Alternatives 16(1), 20–29.
Stoett, P. (1995), Atoms, Whales, and Rivers: Global Environmental Security and International Organization.Commack. New York: Nova Science.
Stoett, P. (1997a), The International Politics of Whaling. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Stoett, P. (1997b), 'To Trade or Not to Trade? The African Elephant and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species', International Journal LII(4), 567–575.
Stoett, P. and P. Teitelbaum (1999), 'The Hague Appeal for Peace Conference: Reflections on Civil Society and NGOs', International Journal LV(1), 35–44.
Tobin, R. (1990), The Expendable Future: U.S.Politics and the Protection of Biological Diversity. Durham. NC: Duke University Press.
Wackernagel, M. and W. Rees (1997), 'Perceptual and Structural Barriers to Investing in Natural Capital: Economics from an Ecological Footprint Perspective', Ecological Economics 20, 3–24.
Warner, J. (2000), 'Global Environmental Security: An Emerging “Concept of Control”?', in P. Stott and S. Sullivan (eds.), Political Ecology: Science, Myth and Power (pp. 247–265), London: Arnold.
Webster, D. (1997), 'The Looting and Smuggling and Fencing and Hoarding of Impossibly Precious, Feathered and Scaly Wild Things', New York Times Magazine (Feb. 16), 26–35.
Wenzel, G. W. (1991), Animal Rights, Human Rights: Ecology, Economy and Ideology in the Canadian Arctic. London: Belhaven.
Wissenburg, M. (2001), 'Dehierarchization and Sustainable Development in Liberal and Non-liberal Societies', Global Environmental Politics 1(2), 95–111.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stoett, P. The International Regulation of Trade in Wildlife: Institutional and Normative Considerations. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2, 193–208 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020942110468
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020942110468