Advertisement

Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 13–25 | Cite as

The Race for Females: The Mating System of the Red Mason Bee, Osmia rufa (L.) (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)

  • Karsten Seidelmann
Article

Abstract

The ecology of a species strongly influences the strategies with which males and females maximize their lifetime reproductive success. When males and females do not invest equally in offspring, the sex with the higher parental investment becomes a rare resource for the other. The spatial and temporal distribution of the limiting sex forms the basis of the mating system. In nest-constructing Aculeata such as the red mason bee, Osmia rufa, females perform intensive brood care, whereas males do not invest in their offspring but instead compete for access to mates. Receptive females of this species are widely distributed and do not assemble at certain places. Therefore, territorial behavior is not an advantageous mating tactic for males, which instead search for females within individual home ranges usually centered around food plants. The unmarked or defended home ranges of different males may completely overlap. Competitive searching leads to a random distribution of matings among males that is largely independent of body size. The mating system of O. rufa can be described as scramble competition polygyny.

Apoidea solitary bee mating system male behavior scramble competition polygyny 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Alcock, J. (1979). The evolution of intraspecific diversity in male reproductive strategies in some bees and wasps. In Blum, M. S., and Blum, N. A. (eds.), Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects, Academic Press, New York, pp. 381–402.Google Scholar
  2. Alcock, J. (1980). Natural selection and mating systems of solitary bees. Am. Sci. 68: 146–153.Google Scholar
  3. Alcock, J. (1990). Body size and territorial behavior in the bee Protoxaea gloriosa (Fox) (Hymenoptera: Oxaeidae). Pan-Pacif. Entomol. 66: 157–161.Google Scholar
  4. Alcock, J., and Gwynne, D. T. (1991). Evolution of insect mating systems: The impact of individual selectionist thinking. In Bailey, W. J., and Ridsdill-Smith, J. (eds.), Reproductive Behavior of Insects—Individuals and Populations, Chapmann & Hall, London, pp. 10–41.Google Scholar
  5. Alcock, J., Jones, C. E., and Buchmann, S. L. (1977). Male mating strategies in the bee Centris pallida Fox (Anthophoridae: Hymenoptera). Am. Nat. 111: 145–155.Google Scholar
  6. Alcock, J., Gordh, G., Hubbard, J., Pyle, R. W., Kirkendall, L., Ponder, T. L., and Zalom, F. G. (1978). The ecology and evolution of male reproductive behavior in the bees and wasps. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 64: 293–326.Google Scholar
  7. Alexander, R. G., and Borgia, G. (1979). On the origin and basis of the male-female phenomenon. In Blum, M. S., and Blum, N. A. (eds.), Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects, Academic Press, New York, pp. 417–440.Google Scholar
  8. Alexander, R. D., Marshall, C. D., and Cooley, J. R. (1997). Evolutionary perspectives on insect mating. In Choe, J. C., and Crespi, B. J. (eds.), The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 4–31.Google Scholar
  9. Arnold, S. J., and Duvall, D. (1994). Animal mating systems: A synthesis based on selection theory. Am. Nat. 143: 317–348.Google Scholar
  10. Bayer-Helms, F. (1993). Untersuchungen zum Fortpflanzungsverhalten solitär lebender Wildbienen an den Beispielen Osmia rufa und Megachile versicolor (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae), Diplomarbeit, University of Göttingen, Göttingen.Google Scholar
  11. Cade, W. (1980). Alternative male reproductive behaviors. Fla. Entomol. 63: 30–44.Google Scholar
  12. Cane, J. H. (1987). Estimation of bee size using intertegular span (Apoidae). J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 60: 145–147.Google Scholar
  13. Cane, J. H., and Tengö, J. O. (1980). Pheromonal cues direct mate-seeking behavior of male Colletes cunicularius (Hymenoptera: Colletidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 7: 427–436.Google Scholar
  14. Chandler, L. (1961). Interspecific competition in Osmia lignaria Say—Osmia cordata Robertson. Proc. N. Centr. Br. Entomol. Soc. Am. 16: 18–19.Google Scholar
  15. Danks, H. V. (1971). Populations and nesting sites of some Aculeate Hymenoptera nesting in Rubus. J. Anim. Ecol. 40: 63–77.Google Scholar
  16. Davies, N. B. (1991). Mating systems. In Krebs, J. R., and Davies, N. B. (eds.), Behavioral Ecology, Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp. 263–300.Google Scholar
  17. Dunbar, R. I. M. (1983). Intraspecific variations in mating strategy. In Bateson, P. P. G., and Klopfer, P. H. (eds.), Perspectives in Ethology, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 385–431.Google Scholar
  18. Eickwort, G. C. (1977). Male territorial behavior in the mason bee Hoplitis anthocopoides (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Anim. Behav. 25: 542–554.Google Scholar
  19. Eickwort, G. C., and Ginsberg, H. S. (1980). Foraging and mating behavior in Apoidea. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 25: 421–446.Google Scholar
  20. Emlen, S. T., and Oring, L. W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197: 215–223.Google Scholar
  21. Hassel, M. P., and Southwood, T. R. E. (1978). Foraging strategies of insects. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 9: 75–98.Google Scholar
  22. Jarošík, V. (1989). Mass vs. length relationship for carabid beetles (Col., Carabidae). Pedobiology 33: 87–90.Google Scholar
  23. Larsen, O. N., Gleffe, G., and Tengö, J. (1986). Vibration and sound communication in solitary bees and wasps. Physiol. Entomol. 11: 287–286.Google Scholar
  24. Longair, R. W. (1987). Mating behavior at floral resources in two species of Pseudomasaris (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Masarinae). Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 89: 759–769.Google Scholar
  25. Milinski, M., and Parker, G. A. (1991). Competition for resources. In Krebs, J. R., and Davies, N. B. (eds.), Behavioural Ecology, Blackwell Scintific, Oxford, pp. 137–168.Google Scholar
  26. Müller, A. (1994). Die Bionomie der in leeren Schneckengehäusen nistenden Biene Osmia spinulosa (Kirby 1802) (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae). Veröff. Natursch. Landschaftspfl. Bad.-Württ. 68/69: 291–334.Google Scholar
  27. O'Neill, K. M., and Bjostad, L. (1987). The male mating strategy of the bee Nomia nevadensis (Hymenoptera: Halictidae): Leg structure and mate guarding. Pan-Pacif. Entomol. 63: 207–217.Google Scholar
  28. Parker, G. A. (1978). The evolution of competitive mate-searching. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 23: 173–196.Google Scholar
  29. Raw, A. (1976). The behavior of males of the solitary bee Osmia rufa (Megachilidae) searching for females. Behavior 56: 279–285.Google Scholar
  30. Ridley, M. (1988). Mating frequency and fecundity in insects. Biol. Rev. 63: 509–549.Google Scholar
  31. Rust, R. W. (1991). Size-weight relationships in Osmia lignaria propinqua Cresson (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 64: 174–178.Google Scholar
  32. Rutowski, R. L., and Alcock, J. (1980). Temporal variation in male copulatory behavior in the solitary bee Nomadopsis puellae (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae). Behavior 73: 175–188.Google Scholar
  33. Seidelmann, K. (1995). Untersuchungen zur Reproduktionsbiologie der Roten Mauerbiene, Osmia rufa (L., 1758), Dissertation, University of Halle, Halle.Google Scholar
  34. Smith, A. P., and Alcock, J. (1980). A comparative study of the mating system of Australian eumenid wasps (Hymenoptera). Z. Tierpsychol. 53: 41–60.Google Scholar
  35. Stone, G. N. (1995). Female foraging responses to sexual harassment in the solitary bee Anthophora plumipes. Anim. Behav. 50: 405–412.Google Scholar
  36. Stone, G. N., Loder, P. M. J., and Blackburn, T. M. (1995). Foraging and courtship behavior in males of the solitary bee Anthophora plumipes (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae): Thermal physiology and the roles of body size. Ecol. Entomol. 20: 169–183.Google Scholar
  37. Tepedino, V. J., and Torchio, P. F. (1989). Influence of nest hole selection on sex ratio and progeny size in Osmia lignaria propinqua (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 82: 355–360.Google Scholar
  38. Thalmann, U. (1991). Ausgewählte Untersuchungen zur Reproduktionsbiologie der Solitärbienen-Arten Anthophara acervorum (Linné, 1758) und Osmia rufa (Linné, 1758), Dissertation, University of Halle, Halle.Google Scholar
  39. Thornhill, R., and Alcock, J. (1983). The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  40. Vleugel, D. A. (1952). Beobachtungen über den Revierbesitz bei der Roten Mauerbiene (Osmia rufa L.). Trans. Ninth. Int. Congr. Entomol. 1: 402–408.Google Scholar
  41. Wcislo, W. T., Minckley, R. L., and Spangler, H. C. (1992). Pre-copulatory courtship behavior in a solitary bee, Nomia triangulifera Vachal (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Apidologie 23: 431–442.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karsten Seidelmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für ZoologieMartin-Luther-Universität Halle-WittenbergHalle (Saale)Germany. Fax:

Personalised recommendations