Skip to main content
Log in

Anodically deposited manganese–molybdenum–tungsten oxide anodes for oxygen evolution in seawater electrolysis

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Electrochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ternary manganese–molybdenum–tungsten oxides were anodically deposited on to IrO2-coated titanium substrates at current densities of 60–600 A m−2 in 0.4 M MnSO4 solutions containing 0.003 M Na2MoO4 and 0.003 M Na2WO4 at pH 0–1.5 and at 30–90 °C. The effect of anodic deposition conditions on the activity, selectivity and durability of the anodes for oxygen evolution in 0.5 M NaCl solution was investigated. Most of the oxide anodes prepared initially gave an oxygen evolution efficiency of almost 100%. When the anodic deposition was performed at temperatures lower than 90 °C, gradual oxidative dissolution occurred during the electrolysis in the NaCl solution, due to formation of poorly crystalline oxides. In contrast, the oxide deposited at 90 °C revealed no obvious dissolution during electrolysis for more than 1500 h. The oxygen evolution efficiency, however, decreased gradually with time of electrolysis because of partial detachment of the deposited oxide. The anodic deposition in electrolytes at lower pH and at higher current density resulted in the formation of oxides with better adhesion to the substrate, resulting in improved anode durability. The durability was further improved by repeated anodic deposition with the oxide surface washed during intervals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.E. Bennett, in T.N. Veziroglu and W. Seifritz (Eds) Proceedings of the 2nd World Hydrogen Energy conference, (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1978), p. 291.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.E. Bennett, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 5 (1980) 401.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Hiroi, M. Muroya, E. Tada and S. Ogawa, Denki Kagaku 57 (1989) 837.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Hiroi, Y. Takemoto, M. Muroya, E. Tada and S. Ogawa, Denki Kagaku 58 (1990) 184.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Izumiya, E. Akiyama, H. Habazaki, N. Kumagai, A. Kawashima and K. Hashimoto, Electrochim. Acta 43 (1998) 3303.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. Fujimura, K. Izumiya, A. Kawashima, H. Habazaki, E. Akiyama, N. Kumagai and K. Hashimoto, J. Appl. Electrochem. 29(1999) 769.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. Fujimura, T. Matsui, K. Izumiya, N. Kumagai, E. Akiyama, H. Habazaki, A. Kawashima, K. Asami and K. Hashimoto, Mater. Sci. Eng. A267 (1999) 254.

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. Fujimura, T. Matsui, H. Habazaki, A. Kawashima, N. Kumagai and K. Hashimoto, Electrochim. Acta 45 (2000) 2297.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Habazaki, T. Matsui, A. Kawashima, K. Asami, N. Kumagai and K. Hashimoto, Script. Mater. 44 (2001) 1659.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Habazaki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matsui, T., Habazaki, H., Kawashima, A. et al. Anodically deposited manganese–molybdenum–tungsten oxide anodes for oxygen evolution in seawater electrolysis. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry 32, 993–1000 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020912611494

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020912611494

Navigation