Abstract
The constant comparative method (CCM) together with theoretical sampling constitutethe core of qualitative analysis in the grounded theory approach and in other types ofqualitative research. Since the application of the method remains rather unclear, researchers do not know how to `go about' the CCM in their research practice. This study contributes to a purposeful approach of the CCM in order to systematize the analysis process and to increase the traceability and verification of the analyses. The step by step approach is derived from and illustrated with an empirical study into the experience of multiple sclerosis (MS) by patients and their spousal care providers. In this study five different steps were distinguished on the basis of four criteria: (1) the data involved and the overall analysis activities, (2) the aim, (3) the results and (4) the questions asked. It is concluded that systematization of qualitative analysis results from the researcher using a sound plan for conducting CCM regarding these four aspects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boeije, H. R., Bromberger, N., Duijnstee, M. S. H., Grypdonck, M. H. F. & Pool, A. (1999). In relatie tot MS. Zorgafhankelijke mensen met Multiple Sclerose en hun partners. Utrecht: NIZW.
Chenitz, W. C. & Swanson, J. M. (eds.) (1986). From Practice to Grounded Theory: Qualitative Research in Nursing. Menlo Park: Addison-Wesley.
Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.) (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative Data Analysis. A User Friendly Guide for Social Scientists. London & New York: Routledge.
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1965). Awareness of Dying. Chicago: Aldine Publishers.
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
Glaser, B. G. (1992). Emergence vs. Forcing. Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.
Kimchi, J., Polivka, B. & Stevenson, J. S. (1991). Triangulation. Operational definitions. Nursing Research 40: 120-123.
Kuckartz, U. (1998). WinMAX 97. Scientific Text Analysis for the Social Sciences. Berlin.
Layder, D. (1993). New Strategies in Social Research. An Introduction and Guide. Cambridge: Polity.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Morse, J. M. & Field, P. A. (1998). Nursing Research of Qualitative Approaches. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes.
Schwandt, T. A. (1997). Qualitative Inquiry. A Dictionary of Terms. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Sivesind, K. H. (1999). Structured, qualitative comparison. Quality and Quantity 33: 361-380.
Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. London: Sage.
Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative Research. Analysis Types and Software. London: Falmer press.
Wester, F. (1995). Strategieë n voor kwalitatief onderzoek. Muiderberg: Coutinho.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boeije, H. A Purposeful Approach to the Constant Comparative Method in the Analysis of Qualitative Interviews. Quality & Quantity 36, 391–409 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020909529486
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020909529486