Skip to main content
Log in

Defending the Articles of Confederation: A Reply to Dougherty

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This reply addresses the issues raised byDougherty in response to my 1999 article in this journal. Ialso develop a new graphical model of the optimal collectionrate under the Articles, where states made contributions, andcontrast it to the revenue potential from direct taxation. Ibelieve that despite Dougherty's criticisms, my argumentremains valid. While the Articles were not perfect in anabsolute sense, that when more properly viewed in acomparative manner, that the system of state contributions forraising revenue under the Articles was (and still is) superiorto a system of direct federal taxation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brennan, G. and Buchanan, J.M. (1977). Towards a tax constitution for leviathan. Journal of Public Economics 8: 255-274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G. and Buchanan, J.M. (1980). The power to tax: Analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G. and Buchanan, J.M. (1986). The reason of rules: constitutional political economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, C.J. (1979 [1895]). The finances of the United States from 1775 to 1789. Philadelphia, PA: Porcupine Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, K.L. (forthcoming). Defending the Articles of Confederation: A response to Sobel. Public Choice.

  • Dougherty, K.L. and Cain, M.J.G. (1997). Marginal cost sharing and the Articles of Confederation. Public Choice 90: 201-213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, R.G. (1991). Constitutions as constraints: A case study of three American constitutions. Constitutional Political Economy 2: 303-328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, R.G. (1992). The distributive model of government: Evidence from the Confederate constitution. Southern Economic Journal 58: 762-769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D.R. (1985). Reverse revenue sharing: A modest proposal. Public Choice 45: 279-289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D.R. (1994). Reverse revenue sharing: A return to fiscal federalism. Cato Journal 14: 75-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W.A. (1968). Nonmarket decision making: The peculiar economics of bureaucracy. American Economic Review 58: 293-305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W.A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slemrod J. (1990). Optimal taxation and optimal tax systems. Journal of Economic Perspectives 4: 157-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, R.S. (1994). The league of nations covenant and the United Nations charter: An analysis of two international constitutions. Constitutional Political Economy 5: 173-192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, R.S. (1996). Vibert's European Union: A United Nations or United States? Constitutional Political Economy 7: 309-316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, R.S. (1997). Optimal taxation in a federal system of governments. Southern Economic Journal 64: 468-486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, R.S. (1999). In defense of the Articles of Confederation and the contribution mechanism as a means of government finance: A general comment on the literature. Public Choice 99: 347-356.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sobel, R.S. Defending the Articles of Confederation: A Reply to Dougherty. Public Choice 113, 287–299 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020899128933

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020899128933

Keywords

Navigation