Skip to main content
Log in

Using Computer Assisted Instruction to Compare the Inventive Model and the Radical Constructivist Approach to Teaching Physics

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper introduces a new way of evaluating instructional strategies by using computers. Two basic theories, instructivism and constructivism, are discussed and critically evaluated in terms of their effectiveness in conceptual learning. Despite the current popularity of constructivism, the radical form of it is criticized in this paper. The advantages and limitations of these two approaches, especially the radical forms of constructivism, are outlined. After borrowing some ideas from other effective conceptual change models, an integrative model for conceptual learning (the Inventive Model) is introduced. Two versions of multimedia physics software are developed by the authors. The first version is based on the Inventive Model and the second version based on a radical constructivist model. The effectiveness of the Inventive Model was compared with the radical constructivist approach and conventional science instruction. Students' log files were analyzed to investigate the nature and the processes of the conceptual change. A conceptual test and a knowledge test were used to compare the groups. The quantitative results showed the superiority of the Inventive Model over the other models in conceptual learning and the superiority of conventional instruction in learning the basic knowledge. The qualitative analysis showed that only the Inventive Model lead to coherent conceptual learning. It was concluded that the process of conceptual change is gradual and continuous. Analysis of students' log files revealed no moments of dramatic change in students' conceptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., and Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, E. L., and O'Neil, H. F. (1994). Technology Assessment: In Education and Training, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, R. K., and Maloney, D. P. (1991). Effects of written text on usage of Newton's third law. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28: 123-139

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1960). The Process of Education, Vintage, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher 23: 13-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, A., and Liebmann, R. (1995). Process is as important as content. Educational Leadership 52: 23-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekkers, P. J. J. M., and Thijs, G. D. (1998). Making productive use of students' initial conceptions in developing the concept of force. Science Education 82: 31-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • di Sessa, A. A. (1987). Toward an Epistemology of Physics, Berkley Cognitive Science Series, University of California, Berkely, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dykstra, D., Boyle, C. F., and Monarch, I. A. (1992). Studying conceptual change in learning physics. Science Education 76: 615-652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernest, P. (1995). The one and the many. In Steffe, L., and Gale, J. (Eds.), Constructivism in Education, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 459-486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, E. (1997). Educationally important types of children's talk. In Wegerif, P., and Scrimshaw, P. (Eds.), Computers and Talk in the Primary Classroom, Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, UK, pp. 22-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geelan, D. R. (1997). Epistemological anarchy and the many forms of constructivism. Science and Education 6: 15-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasersfeld, E. V. (1995). A constructivist approach to teaching. In Steffe, L. and Gale, J. (Eds.), Constructivism in Education, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 3-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, D. J., and McDermott, L. C. (1996). Use of the computer for research on student thinking in physics. American Journal of Physics 64: 557-565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics 66: 64-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halloun, I. A., and Hestenes, D. (1985a). Common sense concepts about motion. American Journal of Physics 53: 1056-1065.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halloun, I. A., and Hestenes, D. (1985b). The initial knowledge state of college physics students. American Journal of Physics 53: 1043-1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, P. A., and Vining, L. C. (1997). The impact of the knowledge explosion on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34: 969-975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. R., and Alexander, P. A. (1998). Integrated, constructivist education: Challenge and reality. Educational Psychology Review 10: 115-127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hestenes, D. (1998). Who needs physics education research? American Journal of Physics 66: 465-467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hestenes, D., and Halloun, I. (1995). Interpreting the Force Concept Inventory: A response to March 1995 Critique by Huffman and Heller. The Physics Teacher 33: 502-506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. M. (1995). Educational Philosophies: A Primer for Parents, PRESS (Parents Raising Educational Standards in Schools), Milwaukee, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T., and Berger, C. (1995). Students' use of multimedia science instruction: designing for MTV generation. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hyper Media 4: 305-320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L., and Rezaei, A. R. (1999). The potentials of modern tele-learning tools for collaborative learning. Canadian Journal of Communication 24: 427-448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komoski, K. (1989). The Quest for Quality Software: Information Technologies in Education, Center for educational research and information, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C. L. C., and Cohen, P. A. (1980). Effectiveness of computer-based college teaching: A meta-analysis of findings. Review of Educational Research 50: 525-544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. R. (1997). Introductory comments on philosophy and constructivism in science education. Science and Education 6: 5-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right question? Educational Psychologist 32: 1-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, E. (1997). Peer Instruction: A User's Manual, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, L. C. (1984). Research on conceptual understanding in mechanics. Physics Today 37: 24-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mestre, J. P. (1994). Cognitive aspects of learning and teaching science. In Fitsimmons, S. J., and Kerpleman, L. C. (Eds.), Teacher Enhancement for Elementary and Secondary Science and Mathematics: Status, Issues, and Problems, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H., and Novak, J. D. (1998). Meaningful learning in science: The human constructivist perspective. In Phye, G. D. (Ed.), Handbook of Academic Learning: Construction of Knowledge, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 405-447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neressian, N. J. (1989). Conceptual change in science and science education. Synthese 80: 163-183.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill, G. P. (1988). Teaching effectiveness: A review of the research. Canadian Journal of Education 13: 162-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, R. J., and Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in Science: The Implications of Children's Science, Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. C. (1997). Coming to grips with radical social constructivisms. Science and Education 6: 85-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1926). The Language and Thought of the Child, Harcourt, Braco, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., and Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception. Science Education 66: 211-227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei, A. R., and Katz, L. (1998). A cognitive model for conceptual change in science instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research 19: 153-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roblyer, M. D., and Edwards, J. (2000). Integrating Educational Technology IntoTeaching, Printice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwier, R. A., and Misanchuk, E. R. (1993). Interactive Multimedia Instruction, Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shabo, A. (1997). Integrating consructivism and instructivism in educational hypermedia programs. Journal of Educational Computing Research 17: 231-247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, B. (1994). What Children Bring to Light: A Constructivist Perspective on Children's Learning in Science, Teacher College Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, R., Feltovich, P., Jacobson, M., and Coulson, R. (1991). Knowledge representation, content specification, and the development of skill in situation-specific knowledge: Some constructivist issues as they relate to cognitive flexibility and hypertext. Educational Technology 31: 22-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, S. (1991). An eclectic examination of some issues in the constructivist-ISD controversy. Educational Technology 31: 41-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treagust, D. F., Duit, R., and Fraser, B. J. (1996). Improving Teaching and Learning in Science and Mathematics, Teacher College Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowbridge, D. E., and McDermott, L. C. (1981). Investigation of student understanding of the concept of acceleration in one dimension. American Journal of Physics 49: 242-253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S., and Brewer, W. F. (1987). Theories of knowledge restructuring in development. Review of Educational Research 57: 51-67

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Socity: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, M., Hestenes, D., and Swackhamer, G. (1995). A modeling method for high school physics instruction. American Journal of Physics 63: 606-619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willett, J. B., Yamashita, J. M., and Anderson, R. D. (1983). A meta-analysis of instructional systems applied in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 20: 405-417.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Larry Katz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rezaei, A.R., Katz, L. Using Computer Assisted Instruction to Compare the Inventive Model and the Radical Constructivist Approach to Teaching Physics. Journal of Science Education and Technology 11, 367–380 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020894002232

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020894002232

Navigation