Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 781–794 | Cite as

Recognition of Dominance Status By Chemoreception in the Red Swamp Crayfish, Procambarus clarkii

  • Rebecca A. Zulandt Schneider
  • Robb W. S. Schneider
  • Paul A. Moore


We tested the hypothesis that chemical signals play a role in the recognition of dominance status in the red swamp crayfish, Procambarus clarkii. Dominance was judged on the outcome of dyadic interactions in all male or female groups of three individuals. This resulted in a dominant, intermediate, and subordinate individual within each population. A choice paradigm in a flow-through Y maze was used to judge whether crayfish were able to recognize dominance through chemical cues alone. Both individuals that interacted with the animal producing the odor and naive individuals were tested. Irrespective of sex and previous experience, individuals increased their rates of locomotion in the presence of conspecific odor. Naive males investigated the dominant arm first, spent more time at the dominant nozzle, and responded more aggressively (as measured by meral spread) to dominant male odor and subordinate female odor. Intermediate males spent more time at the dominant male nozzle and responded more aggressively to dominant male odor. Naive females spent more time at the dominant nozzle. These results show that males recognize dominant animals. Since both naive and experienced males respond to water from dominant animals, we concluded that this is recognition of dominance and not just individual recognition. This signal may be important for the formation or reinforcement of dominance relationships. Based on the change in behavior between odors, we suggest that crayfish can use chemical cues to recognize the dominance status of conspecifics.

crayfish Procambarus clarkii dominance status recognition chemoreception 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Akers, P. R., and O'Connell, R. J. 1988. The contribution of olfactory receptor neurons to the perception of pheromone component ratios in male redbanded leafroller moths. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 163:641–650.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ameyaw-Akumfi, C. E., and Hazlett, B. A. 1975. Sex recognition in the crayfish Procambarus clarkii. Science 190:1225–1226.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, T. C., and CardÉ, R. T. 1979. Analysis of pheromone-mediated behaviors in male Grapholitha molesta, the oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Environ. Entomol. 8:956–968.Google Scholar
  4. Berrill, M., and Arsenault, M. 1984. The breeding behavior of a northern temperate orconectid crayfish, Orconectes rusticus. Anim. Behav. 32:333–339.Google Scholar
  5. Bovbjerg, R. V. 1953. Dominance order in the crayfish Orconectes virilis (Hagan). Physiol. Zool. 26:173–178.Google Scholar
  6. Bovbjerg, R. V. 1970. Ecological isolation and competitive exclusion in two crayfish (Orconectes virilis and Orconectes immunis). Ecology 51:225–236.Google Scholar
  7. Bruski, C., and Dunham, D. W. 1987. The importance of vision in agonistic communication of the crayfish Orconectes rusticus I: An analysis of bout dynamics. Behaviour 103:83–107.Google Scholar
  8. Copp, N. H. 1986. Dominance hierarchies in the crayfish Procambarus clarkii (Girard, 1852) and the question of learned individual recognition (Decapoda, Astacidea). Crustaceana 51:9–24.Google Scholar
  9. DeFraipont, M., and Sorensen, P. W. 1993. Exposure to the pheromone 17α,20β-dihydroxy-4-pregnen-3-one enhances the behavioural spawning success, sperm production and sperm motility of male goldfish. Anim. Behav. 46:245–256.Google Scholar
  10. Dunham, D. W., and Oh, J. W. 1992. Chemical sex discrimination in the crayfish Procambarus clarkii: Role of antennules. J. Chem. Ecol. 18:2363–2372.Google Scholar
  11. Dunham, D. W., and Oh, J. W. 1996. Sex discrimination by female Procambarus clarkii (Girard, 1852) (Decapoda, Cambaridae): Use of chemical and visual stimuli. Crustaceana 69:534–542.Google Scholar
  12. Hazlett, B. A. 1969. Individual recognition and agonistic behaviour in Pagurus bernhardus. Nature 222:268–269.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hazlett, B. A. 1979. Individual distance in Crustacea: IV. Distance and dominance hierarchies in Pagurus pollicaris. Mar. Behav. Physiol. 6:225–242.Google Scholar
  14. Hazlett, B. A. 1985a. Chemical detection of sex and condition in the crayfish Orconectes virilis. J. Chem. Ecol. 11:181–189.Google Scholar
  15. Hazlett, B. A. 1985b. Disturbance pheromones in the crayfish Orconectes virilis. J. Chem. Ecol. 11:1695–1711.Google Scholar
  16. Hazlett, B. A. 1990. Source and nature of disturbance-chemical system in crayfish. J. Chem. Ecol. 16:2263–2275.Google Scholar
  17. Hefetz, A. 1992. Individual scent marking of the nest as a mechanism of recognition in Xylocopa pubescens (Hymenoptera, Anthophoridae). J. Insect Behav. 5:763–772.Google Scholar
  18. Huber, R., Smith, K., Delago, A., Isaksson, K., and Kravitz, E. A. 1997. Serotonin and aggressive motivation in crustaceans: Altering the decision to retreat. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94:5939–5942.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnston, R. E., and Robinson, T. A. 1993. Cross-species discrimination of individual odors by hamsters (Muridae: Mesocricetus auratus, Phodopus campbelli). Ethology 94:317–325.Google Scholar
  20. Liu, Y., and Haynes, K. F. 1993. Pheromone-mediated responses of male cabbage looper moths, Trichoplusia ni, following various exposures to sex pheromone or (Z)-7-dodecenol. J. Chem. Ecol. 19:503–515.Google Scholar
  21. Moore, P. A., and Grills, J. 1999. Chemical orientation to food by the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus: Influence by hydrodynamics. Anim. Behav. In press.Google Scholar
  22. Moore, P. J., Reagan-Wallin, N. L., Haynes, K. F., and Moore, A. J. 1997. Odour conveys status on cockroaches. Nature 389:25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Rubenstein, D. I., and Hazlett, B. A. 1973. Examination of agonistic behavior of the crayfish Orconectes virilis by character analysis. Behaviour 50:193–216.Google Scholar
  24. Rutherford, P. L., Dunham, D. W., and Allison, V. 1995. Winning agonistic encountering by male crayfish Orconectes rusticus (Girard) (Decapoda, Cambaridae): chela size matters but chela symmetry does not. Crustaceana 68:526–529.Google Scholar
  25. Rutherford, P. L., Dunham, D. W., and Allison, V. 1996. Antennule use and agonistic success in the crayfish Orconectes rusticus (Girard, 1852) (Decapoda, Cambridae). Crustaceana 69:117–122.Google Scholar
  26. Smith, M. A., and Dunham, D. W. 1996. Antennae mediate agonistic physical contact in the crayfish Orconectes rusticus (Girard, 1852) (Decapoda, Cambaridae). Crustaceana 69:668–674.Google Scholar
  27. Thorpe, J. H., and Ammerman, K. S. 1978. Chemical communication and agonism in the crayfish, Procambarus acutus acutus. Am. Mid. Nat. 100:471–474.Google Scholar
  28. Tierney, A. J., and Dunham, D. W. 1982. Chemical communication in the reproductive isolation of the crayfishes Orconectes propinquus and Orconectes virilis (Decapoda, Cambaridae). J. Crust. Biol. 2:544–548.Google Scholar
  29. Winston, M. L., and Jacobson, S. 1978. Dominance and effects of strange conspecifics on aggressive interactions in the hermit crab Pagurus longicarpus (Say). Anim. Behav. 26:184–191.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Yeh, S., Fricke, R. A., and Edwards, D. H. 1996. The effect of social experience on serotonergic modulation of the escape circuit of crayfish. Science 271:366–369.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Yeh, S., Musolf, B. E., and Edwards, D. H. 1997. Neuronal adaptations to changes in the social dominance status of crayfish. J. Neurosci 17:697–708.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Zar, J. H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  33. Zulandt, R. A., and Moore, P. A. 1998. Characterization of the nature of information between chemical signal sources in the crayfish Procambarus clarkii. Chem. Senses 23:637.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rebecca A. Zulandt Schneider
    • 1
  • Robb W. S. Schneider
    • 1
  • Paul A. Moore
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for Sensory Ecology, Department of Biological SciencesBowling Green State UniversityBowling Green

Personalised recommendations