Abstract
This article considers a rent-seeking model with N asymmetriccontestants. Each contestant may have a different valuation ofthe rent or a different relative ability to win the rent. Oneof the N contestants is selected as the winner based onTullock's probabilistic contest rule with constant returns toscale. A pure strategy Nash equilibrium solution is obtainedand its consequences are investigated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allard, R.J. (1988). Rent-seeking with non-identical players. Public Choice 57: 3-14.
Baik, K.H. (1994). Effort levels in contests with two asymmetric players. Southern Economic Journal 61: 367-378.
Hillman, A.L. and Riley, J.C. (1989). Politically contestable rents and transfers. Economics and Politics 1: 17-39.
Gradstein, M. (1991). Intensity of competition in strategic contests, Mimeo. (Ben-Gurion University, Beersheva).
Katz, E., Nitzan, S. and Rosenberg, J. (1990). Rent-seeking for pure public goods. Public Choice 65: 49-60.
Kohli, I. and Singh, N. (1999). Rent seeking and rent setting with asymmetric effectiveness of lobbying. Public Choice 99: 275-298.
Leininger, W. (1993). More efficient rent-seeking-A Münchhausen solution. Public Choice 75: 43-62.
Nitzan, S. (1994). Modelling rent-seeking contests. European Journal of Political Economy 10: 41-60.
Nti, K.O. (1998). Effort and performance in group contests. European Journal of Political Economy 14: 769-781.
Nti, K.O. (1999). Rent-seeking with asymmetric valuations. Public Choice 98: 415-430.
Tullock, G. (1980). Efficient rent seeking. In J.M. Buchanan, R.D. Tollison, and G. Tullock (Eds.), Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society, 97-112. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stein, W.E. Asymmetric Rent-Seeking with More than Two Contestants. Public Choice 113, 325–336 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020877410243
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020877410243