The recent changes in the US wage structure are often linked to the new wave of capital-embodied information technologies. The existing literature has emphasized either the accelerated pace or the skill-bias of embodied technical progress as the driving force behind the rise in wage inequality. A key, neglected, aspect is the “general purpose” nature of the new information technologies. This paper formalizes the idea of generality of technology in two ways, one related to human capital (skill transferability) and one to physical capital (vintage compatibility) and studies the impact of an increase in these two dimensions of technological generality on equilibrium wage inequality.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Acemoglu, D. (1998). “Why Do Technologies Complement Skills? Directed Technical Change and Wage Inequality,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, 1055–1090.
Acemoglu, D. (1999). “Changes in Unemployment and Wage Inequality: An Alternative Theory and Some Evidence,” American Economic Review 89, 1259–1278.
Acemoglu, D. (2002). “Technical Change, Inequality and the Labor Market,” Journal of Economic Literature XL(1), 7–72.
Aghion, P. (2002). “Schumpeterian Growth Theory and the Dynamics of Income Inequality,” Econometrica 70(3).
Aghion, P., P. Howitt, and G.L. Violante. (2000). “Technological Change and Earnings Volatility.” Mimeo UCL.
Bartel, A., and F. Lichtenberg. (1987). “The Comparative Advantage of Educated Workers in Implementing New Technology,” Review of Economics and Statistics 69, 1–11.
Blundell, R., and I. Preston. (1999). “Inequality and Uncertainty: Short-Run Uncertainty and Permanent Inequality in the US and Britain.” Mimeo UCL.
Bresnahan, T., and M. Trajtenberg. (1995), “General Purpose Technologies: ‘Engines of Growth'?,” Journal of Econometrics 65(1), 83–108.
Caroli, E., and J. Van Reenen. (2001). “Skilled-Bias Organisational Change? Evidence From a Panel of British and French Establishments,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(4), 1449–1492.
Caselli, F. (1999). “Technological Revolutions,” American Economic Review 89(1), 78–102.
Computer Science and Telecommunications Board (1996). The Unpredictable Certainty: Information Infrastructure through 2000. Washington: National Academy Press.
Cooley, T. (ed.) (1995). Frontier of Business Cycle Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
DiNardo J., N. Fortin, and T. Lemieux. (1996). “Labor Market Institutions and the Distribution of Wages, 1973–1992: A Semiparametric Approach,” Econometrica 64, 1001–1044.
Doms, M., T. Dunne, and K. Troske. (1997). “Workers, Wages, and Technology,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(1), 253–290.
Flug, K., and Z. Hercowitz. (2000). “Equipment Investment and the Relative Demand for Skilled Labor: International Evidence,” Review of Economic Dynamics 3(3), 461–485.
Galor, O., and O. Moav. (2000). “Ability Biased Technological Transition, Wage Inequality Within and Across Groups, and Economic Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115, 469–497.
Galor, O., and D. Tsiddon. (1997). “Technological Progress, Mobility, and Economic Growth,” American Economic Review 87(3), 363–382.
Gittleman, M., and M. Joyce. (1996). “Earnings Mobility and Long-Run Inequality: An Analysis Using Matched CPS Data,” Industrial Relations 35(2), 180–197.
Gordon, R.J. (1990). The Measurement of Durable Good Prices. NBER Monograph Series, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gottschalk, P., and R. Moffitt. (1994). “The Growth of Earnings Instability in the US Labour Market,” Brookings Papers of Economic Activity 2, 217–272.
Gould, E., O. Moav, and B. Weinberg. (2001). “Precautionary Demand for Education, Inequality and Technological Progress,” Journal of Economic Growth 6, 285–315.
Greenwood, J., and M. Yorukoglu. (1997). “1974,” Carnagie-Rochester Series on Public Policy 46, 49–95.
Helpman, E. (ed.) (1998). General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.
Helpman, E., and A. Rangel. (1999). “Adjusting to a New Technology: Experience and Training,” Journal of Economic Growth 4, 359–383.
Juhn, C., K. Murphy, and B. Pierce. (1993). “Wage Inequality and the Rise in Returns to Skill,” Journal of Political Economy 101, 410–442.
Katz, L., and D. Autor. (1999). “Changes in the Wage Structure and Earnings Inequality.” In O. Ashenfelter, and D. Card (eds), Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 3. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Katz, L., and K. Murphy. (1992). “Changes in Relative Wages, 1963–1987: Supply and Demand Factors,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107(1), 35–78.
Krusell, P., L. Ohanian, J. V. Rios-Rull, and G. L. Violante. (2000). “Capital Skill Complementarity and Inequality: A Macroeconomic Analysis,” Econometrica 68, 1029–1054.
Lee, D. (1999). “Wage Inequality in the US During the 1980s: Rising Dispersion or Falling Minimum Wage?,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114, 977–1023.
Lipsey, R. G., C. Bekar, and K. Carlaw. (1998). “The Consequences of Changes in GPTs.” In E. Helpman (ed.), General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.
Mc Connell, S. (1996). “The Role of Computers in Reshaping the Workforce,” Monthly Labour Review, August, 3–5.
Nelson, R. R., and E. S. Phelps. (1966). “Investment in Humans, Technological Diffusion, and Economic Growth,” American Economic Review 56, 69–75.
Rubinstein, Y., and D. Tsiddon. (1999). “Coping with Technological Progress: The Role of Ability in Making Inequality so Persistent.” Mimeo Tel Aviv University.
Topel, R. (1991). “Specific Capital, Mobility, and Wages: Wages Rise with Job Seniority,” Journal of Political Economy 99, 145–177.
Violante, G. L. (2002). “Technological Acceleration, Skill Transferability and the Rise in Residual Inequality,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(1), 297–338.
Wood, A. (1995). “How Trade Hurt Unskilled Workers,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9, 57–80.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aghion, P., Howitt, P. & Violante†, G.L. General Purpose Technology and Wage Inequality. Journal of Economic Growth 7, 315–345 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020875717066
- general purpose technology
- wage inequality
- experience premium
- skill transferability
- vintage compatibility