Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 401–415 | Cite as

Ecological Example of Conditioned Flavor Aversion in Plant–Herbivore Interactions: Effect of Terpenes of Eucalyptus Leaves on Feeding by Common Ringtail and Brushtail Possums

  • Ivan R. Lawler
  • Jessica Stapley
  • William J. Foley
  • Bart M. Eschler


We investigated the hypothesis that feeding deterrence of common ringtail possums (Pseudocheirus peregrinus) and common brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) by Eucalyptus terpenes (in this case 1,8-cineole) is a result of a conditioned flavor aversion (CFA), due to the association of terpenes with postingestive effects of another group of Eucalyptus toxins, the diformylphloroglucinol compounds (DFPCs). Wild-caught common ringtail and common brushtail possums showed a dose-dependent reduction in food intake when 1,8-cineole was added to the diet. However, after continued exposure over 12 days to increasing amounts of cineole in the diet, both species substantially increased their intakes of cineole relative to control animals. This indicated that the aversion to cineole was a conditioned response rather than a physiological limitation in their ability to detoxify terpenes. Subsequent exposure to a diet including both cineole and jensenone (a simple DFPC also found in Eucalyptus and considered to cause postingestive emesis) in corresponding amounts was able to recondition the dose-dependent aversion. Consequently, animals that had been given jensenone showed an aversion to cineole-rich diets that matched the behavior of animals in the control group. This supported our hypothesis that the effect of terpenes on feeding of these marsupial folivores on Eucalyptus is due to a CFA. Possums can cope with levels of terpenes in the diet that far exceed those occurring naturally. The role of terpenes in marsupial folivore–Eucalyptus interactions appears to be to act as a cue to levels of toxic DFPCs in the leaves, rather than acting as toxins in their own right.

Conditioned flavor aversion plant toxin Eucalyptus Pseudocheirus perigrinus Trichosurus vulpecula terpene cineole jensenone food intake emesis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Boland, D. J., Brophy, J. J., and House, A. P. N. 1991. Eucalyptus Leaf Oils: Use, Chemistry, Distillation and Marketing. Inkata Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
  2. Boland, D. J., Brophy, J. J., and Fookes, C. J. R. 1972. Jensenone, a ketone from Eucalyptus jensenii. Phytochemistry 31:2178-2179.Google Scholar
  3. Butler, A., Hill, J. M., Ireland, S. J., Jordan, C. C., and Tyers, M. B. 1988. Pharmacological properties of GR38032F, a novel antagonist at 5-HT3. Br. J. Pharmacol. 94:397-412.Google Scholar
  4. Edwards, P. B., Wanjura, W. J., and Brown, W. V. 1993. Selective herbivory by Christmas beetles in response to intraspecific variation in Eucalyptus terpenoids Oecologia 95:551-557.Google Scholar
  5. Farrow, R. A. 1993. Chemical defenses in eucalypts and how they can be exploited to reduce insect attack, pp. 313-316, in S. A. Corey, D. J. Dall and W. M. Milne (eds.). Pest Control and Sustainable Agriculture. CSIRO, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  6. Foley, W. J. 1987. Digestion and energy metabolism in a small arboreal marsupial, the greater glider (Petauroides volans), fed high-terpene Eucalyptus foliage. J. Comp. Physiol. 157B:355-362.Google Scholar
  7. Foley, W. J. 1992. Nitrogen and energy retention and acid-base status in the common ringtail possum (Pseudocheirus peregrinus): Evidence of the effects of absorbed allelochemicals. Physiol. Zool. 65:403-421.Google Scholar
  8. Foley, W. J., and MacArthur, C. 1994. The effects and costs of ingested allelochemicals in mammals: An ecological perspective, pp. 370-391, in D. J. Chivers and P. Langer (eds.). The Digestive System in Mammals: Food, Form and Function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  9. Ghisalberti, E. L. 1996. Bioactive acylphloroglucinol derivatives from Eucalyptus species. Phytochemistry 41:7-22.Google Scholar
  10. Hume, I. D., and Esson, C. 1993. Nutrients, antinutrients and leaf selection by captive koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus). Aust. J. Zool. 41:379-392.Google Scholar
  11. Kronberg, S. L., Lynch, W. C., Cheney, C. D., and Walker, J. W. 1995. Potential aversive compounds in leafy spurge for ruminants and rats. J. Chem. Ecol. 21:1387-1399.Google Scholar
  12. Kyriazakis, I., Papachristou, T. C., Duncan, A. J., and Gordon, I. J. 1997. Mild conditioned food aversions developed by sheep towards flavors associated with plant secondary compounds. J. Chem. Ecol. 23:727-746.Google Scholar
  13. Lawler, I. R., and Foley, W. J. 1998. Chemical ecology of Eucalyptus essential oils in plant-herbivore interactions, in J. Coppen (ed.). Medicinal and Aromatic Plants—Industrial Profiles: Eucalyptus. Harwood Academic Press, UK.Google Scholar
  14. Lawler, I. R., Foley, W. J., Eschler, B., Pass, D. M., and Handasyde, K. A. 1998a. Intraspecific variation in Eucalyptus secondary metabolites determines food intake by folivorous marsupials. Oecolgia. 116:160-169.Google Scholar
  15. Lawler, I. R., Foley, W. J., Pass, G. J., and Eschler, B. M. 1998b. Administration of a 5HT3 receptor antagonist increases the intake of diets containing Eucalyptus secondary metabolites by marsupials. J. Comp. Physiol. B. 168:611-618.Google Scholar
  16. Launchbaugh, K. L., and Provenza, F. D. 1993. Can plants practice mimicry to avoid grazing by mammalian herbivores? Oikos 66:501-504.Google Scholar
  17. Launchbaugh, K. L., Provenza, F. D., and Burritt, E. A. 1993. How herbivores track variable environments: Response to variability of phytotoxins. J. Chem. Ecol. 19:1047-1056.Google Scholar
  18. Lindstrom, L., Alatalo, R. V., and Mappes, J. 1997. Imperfect Batesian mimicry—the effects of the frequency and the distastefulness of the model. Proc. R. Soc. London. Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 264:149-153.Google Scholar
  19. McLean, S., and Foley, W. J. 1997. Metabolism of Eucalyptus terpenes by herbivorous marsupials. Drug Metab. Rev. 29:213-218.Google Scholar
  20. Montague, T. L. 1994. Wallaby browsing and seedling palatability. Aust. For. 57:171-175.Google Scholar
  21. O'Connor, C. E., and Matthews, L. R. 1997. Duration of cyanide-induced conditioned food aversions in possums. Physiol. Behav. 62:931-933.Google Scholar
  22. Provenza, F. D. 1995. Postingestive feedback as an elementary determinant of food preference and intake in ruminants. J. Range Manage. 48:2-17.Google Scholar
  23. Provenza, F. D. 1996. Acquired aversions as the basis for varied diets of ruminants foraging on rangelands. J. Anim. Sci. 74:2010-2020.Google Scholar
  24. Provenza, F. D., Lynch, J. J., Burritt, E. A., and Scott, C. B. 1994a. How goats learn to distinguish between novel foods that differ in postingestive consequences. J. Chem. Ecol. 20:609-624.Google Scholar
  25. Provenza, F. D., Ortega-Reyes, L., Scott, C. V., Lynch, J. J., and Burritt, E. A. 1994b. Antiemetic drugs attenuate food aversions in sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 72:1989-1994.Google Scholar
  26. Ralphs, M. H. 1997. Persistance of aversions to larkspur in naïve and native cattle. J. Range Manage. 50:367-370.Google Scholar
  27. Ralphs, M. H., Provenza, F. D., Wiedmeier, R. D., and Bunderson, F. B. 1995. Effects of energy source and food flavor on conditioned preferences in sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 73:1651-1657.Google Scholar
  28. Reichardt, P. B., Bryant, J. P., Mattes, B. R., Clausen, T. P., Chapin, F. S., III, and Meyer, M. 1990. Winter chemical defense of Alaskan balsam poplar against snowshoe hares. J. Chem. Ecol. 16:1941-1959.Google Scholar
  29. Southwell, I. A. 1978. Essential oil content of koala food trees, pp. 62-74, in T. J. Bergin (ed.). The Koala: Proceedings of the Taronga Symposium on Koala Biology, Management and Medicine. Zoological Parks Board of NSW, Sydney.Google Scholar
  30. Wang, J., and Provenza, F. D. 1997. Dynamics of preference by sheep offered foods varying in flavors, nutrients and a toxin. J. Chem. Ecol. 23:275-288.Google Scholar
  31. Zoidis, A. M., and Markowitz, H. 1992. Findings from a feeding study of the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) at the San Francisco Zoo. Zoo Biol. 11:417-431.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ivan R. Lawler
    • 1
  • Jessica Stapley
    • 1
  • William J. Foley
    • 1
  • Bart M. Eschler
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Botany and ZoologyAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations