Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic diversity of late blight resistant and susceptible Indian potato cultivars revealed by RAPD markers

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Twenty-four tetraploid Indian potato cultivars were characterized by using RAPD markers to assess diversity within and between late blight resistant and susceptible cultivars. Sixty-four random decamer primers generated802 fragments, ranging in size from 60–3200 bp, with 96.4% fragment polymorphism. Shannon's index of diversity was used to quantify the degree of variability present within and between the variety types. Most of the diversity was detected within variety types, with 88% of variation being within and 12% being between the resistant and susceptible cultivars. No clear groupings based on late blight resistance and susceptibility or kinship was reflected on the dendogram. The late blight resistant cultivars exhibited higher variability compared to susceptible cultivars and they were more dispersed on the PCO plot.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Birhman, R.K. & M. Cappadocia, 1998. DNA fingerprinting (RFLPs and RAPDs) in potato. In: S.M. Paul Khurana, R. Chandra & M.D. Upadhya (Eds.), Comprehensive Potato Biotechnology, pp. 73–96. Malhotra Publishing House, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti, S.K., R.K. Birhman & D. Pattanayak, 1999. Genetic similarity analysis and identification of Indian potato cultivars by random amplified polymorphic DNAs. Indian J Exp Biol 37: 1123–1128.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Demeke, T., D.R. Lynch, L.M. Kawchuk, G.C. Kozub & J.D. Armstrong, 1996. Genetic diversity of potato determined by random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. Plant Cell Reports 15: 662–667.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J.J. & J.L. Doyle, 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh tissue. Phytochem Bul 19: 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaur, P.C., P.K. Gupta & Hari Kishore, 1978. Studies on genetic divergence in potato. Euphytica 27: 361–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaur, P.C., P.S. Naik, S.K. Kaushik & S.K. Chakrabarti, 1999. Indian Potato Varieties. Technical Bulletin No. 51. CPRI, Shimla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosaka, K. & R.E. Jr. Hanneman, 1994. Random amplified polymorphic DNA markers detected in a segregating hybrid population of Solanum chacoense × S. phureja. Jpn J Genet 69: 53–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, C.E., C.A. Lambert, M.M. Greyling, J.H. Louw & L. Warnich, 2000. A comparative assessment of DNA fingerprinting techniques (RAPD, ISSR, AFLP and SSR) in tetraploid potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) germplasm. Euphytica 113: 135–144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milbourne, D., R. Meyer, J.E. Bradshaw, E. Baird, N. Bonar, J. Provan, W. Powell & R. Waugh, 1997. Comparison of PCRbased marker systems for the analysis of genetic relationships in cultivated potato. Mol Breed 3: 127–136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M. & W.H. Li, 1979. Mathematical modeling for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74: 5267–5273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, S., F.N. Wachira, W. Powell & R. Waugh, 1997. Diversity and genetic differentiation among populations of Indian and Kenyan tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) revealed by AFLP Markers. Theor Appl Genet 94: 255–263.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quiros, C.F., A. Ceada, A. Georgescu & J. Hu, 1993. Use of RAPD markers in potato genetics: Segregations in diploid and tetraploid families. Am Potato J 70: 35–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf, F.J., 1998. NTSYS-pc. Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, Version 2.0. Exeter Software, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, B.P., T.A. Joseph & S.K. Kaushik, 1999. Breeding for disease resistance. In: B.P. Singh & G.S. Shekhawat (Eds.), Potato Late Blight in India. Technical Bulletin No. 27, pp. 55-69. CPRI, Shimla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosinski, B. & D.S. Douches, 1996. Using polymerase chain reaction-based DNA amplification to fingerprint North American potato cultivars. HortSci 31: 130–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spooner, D.M., J. Tivang, J. Nienhuis, J.T. Miller, D.S. Douchas & M.A. Contreras, 1996. Comparison of four molecular markers in measuring relationships among the wild potato relatives Solanum section Etuberosum (subgenus Potatoe). Theor Appl Genet 92: 532–540.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Umaerus, V. & M. Umaerus, 1994. Inheritance of resistance to late blight. In: J.E. Bradshaw & G.R. Mackay (Eds.), Potato Genetics, pp. 365–401. CAB International, Wallingford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wastie, R.L., 1991. Breeding for resistance. In: D.S. Ingram & P.H. Williams(Eds.), Advances in Plant Pathology, vol 7: Phytophthora infestans, the cause of late blight of potato, pp. 193–223. Academic Press, London, San Diego, New York, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, J. & M. McClelland, 1990. Fingerprinting genomes with PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucleic Acids Res 18: 7213–7218.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J.G.K., A.R. Kubelik, K.J. Livak, J.A. Rafalski & S.V. Tingey, 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucl Acids Res 18: 7213–7218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, N.D., 1996. QTL mapping and quantitative resistance in plants. Annu Rev Phytopathol 34: 479–501.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pattanayak, D., Chakrabarti, S.K. & Naik, P.S. Genetic diversity of late blight resistant and susceptible Indian potato cultivars revealed by RAPD markers. Euphytica 128, 183–189 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020861225738

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020861225738

Navigation