Skip to main content
Log in

Repeating History: Teacher Licensure Testing in Massachusetts

  • Published:
Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews the history of initial teacher licensure testing in the United States from the 1980s and summarizes the issues and problems that have ensued. The author shows how Massachusetts, a state that has only fairly recently started this testing, is experiencing many of the same difficulties. Included are extensive tables, based on the author's research, providing information concerning the specific tests that were used in the past and an update showing what most states participating in this testing are currently using for their teacher licensure purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan, R. (1985). National Evaluation Systems. Presentation to the Superintendents' Advisory Committee on Teacher Testing. Madison: WI.

  • American Educational Research Association. (2000). AERA position statement concerning high-stakes testing in preK-12 education. Washington, D.C.: Author.

  • Anrig, G.R. (1986). Teacher education and teacher testing: The rush to mandate. Phi Delta Kappan, 67(6), 447-551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arizona Department of Education. (July 23, 1999). Arizona Department of Education website [On-line]. Available: http://www.ade.state.az.us/aboutade/stateboard/stateboard.htm.

  • Association of Mexican American Educators, et al. v. The State of California and the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing. No. 937 F. Supp. 1397 (N.C. CA, 1996).

  • Bond, L. (1998). Disparate impact and teacher certification. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12(2), 211-220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, I. (1985a). Educational Testing Service. Presentation to the Superintendent's Advisory Committee on Teacher Testing. Madison: WI.

  • Bosworth, I. (1985b). Personal communication with I. Bosworth, E.T.S. Evanstan: IL.

  • Bosworth, I. (1985c). Personal communication with I. Bosworth, E.T.S. Evanston: IL.

  • Bracey, G.W. (1986). Pandora and Pollyanna: Some comments on “The rush to mandate”. Phi Delta Kappan, 67(6), 452-455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, A. (1998). Test questions. Education Week, 30-35.

  • Bradley, A. (2000). The gatekeeping challenge. Education Week: Quality counts 2000: Who should teach? [online], 19(18), 20, 22–24, 26. Available: www.edweek.org/sreports/qc00/

    Google Scholar 

  • California Department of Education. (1999). Personal communication with a representative from the California Department of Education, Sacremento: CA.

  • Civil rights lawsuit challenges state teachers test as discriminatory relic of nineteenth century technology. (1992). News release from the Law Offices of Public Advocates, 1-5.

  • Cobb, B., Shaw, R., Bomotti, S., Millard, M., & Whaley, D. (1998). An examination of the PLACE assessments technical report. [On-line]. Available: http://www.colostate.edu/depts/r-dcenter/index.html.

  • Committee on Assessment and Teacher Quality. (2001). Testing teacher candidates: The role of licensure tests in improving teacher quality. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C.C. (1986). Strategies to assure certification and retention of black teachers. Journal of Negro Education, 55(1), 46-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daley, B. (1999). Panel to examine teacher-test report. The Boston Globe, B4.

  • Darling-Hammond, L., Wise, A., & Klein, S. (1999). A license to teach: Raising standards for teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Educational Testing Institute. (2001). Massachusetts teacher test preparatory course: Communication & literacy program workbook. Wakefield, MA: Author.

  • Educational Testing Service. (1998). Guidelines for proper use of the Praxis series and related assessments. Princeton, NJ: Author.

  • Educational Testing Service. (1999). The Praxis series: 1999–2000 registration bulletin. Princeton, NJ: Author.

  • Ellett, C.D. (2002). Personal communication with C.D. Ellett, Watkinsville: GA.

  • Expert calls test-writer's records inadequate. (1986). United Press International, newswire.

  • Falconer, M. (1999). Fewer first-timers fail 4th teacher test: But 96 percent of repeaters don't pass. The Boston Globe, B2.

  • Feistritzer, C.E. (1984). The making of a teacher: A report on teacher education and certification. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feistritzer, C.E. (1996). Profile of teachers in the U.S. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flippo, R.F. (1986a). Teacher certification testing: Perspectives and issues. Journal of Teacher Education, 37(2), 2-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flippo, R.F. (1986b). What are the political ramifications of the teacher competency assessment movement? Urban Educator, 8(1), 55-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flippo, R.F., & Canniff, J.G. (2000). Teacher competency whitewash: How one high-stakes test eliminates diversity from the teaching force. Connection: New England's Journal of Higher Education and Economic Development, 15(2), 28-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flippo, R.F., & Foster, C.R. (1984). Teacher competency testing and its impact on educators. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 10-13. (Reprinted in Teacher Competency [May, 1985] [Vol. 10]. Competency assessment section. Phi Delta Kappa's Hot Topic Series. Bloomington: Phi Delta Kappa.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Flippo, R.F., & Riccards, M.P. (2000). Initial teacher certification testing in Massachusetts: A case of the tail wagging the dog. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(1), 34-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeland, R., & Meade, P. (2001). Shortages and certified teachers. The Boston Globe, C4.

  • Georgia Association of Educators v. Georgia, No. C86-2234A (N.D. GA, 1988, February).

  • Georgia Department of Education. (1987). First report of the Georgia Department of Education on developmental activities for the Georgia Teacher Certification Test. Atlanta: Georgia Department of Education, Division of Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitomer, D.H. (1999). Personal communication with D.H. Gitomer, E.T.S., Princeton: NJ.

  • Gitomer, D.H., Latham, A.S., & Ziomek, R. (1999). The academic quality of prospective teachers: The impact of admissions and licensure testing. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, Teaching and Learning Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goertz, M.E., Ekstrum, R.B., & Coley, R.J. (1984). The impact of state policy on entrance into the teaching profession (Final Report NIE Grant No. G83-0073). Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Education, Educational Policy and Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberger, S. (2001). Lack of certified teachers hampers special-ed classes. The Boston Globe, B1, B8.

  • Haney, W., Fowler, C., & Wheelock, A. (1999). Less truth than error? An independent study of the Massachusetts teacher tests. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation and Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, J. (1998). School chief aims to end racial gap. The Boston Globe, A1.

  • Henke, R., Choy, S., Geis, S., & Broughman, S. (1996). Schools and staffing in the United States: A statistical profile, 1993–94. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illinois Department of Education. (1999). Personal communication with a representative from the Illinois Department of Education, Springfield: IL.

  • International Reading Association. (1999). High-stakes assessments in reading: A position statement of the International Reading Association. Newark, DE: Author.

  • Jaeger, R.M., Busch, J.C., Bond, L., Linn, R.L., Miller, M.D., Millman, J., O'Sullivan, R.G., & Traub, R. (1986). An evaluation of the Georgia teacher certification testing program. Greensboro, NC: Center for Educational Research and Evaluation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, P. (Ed.). (2001). MECT review authorized. Massachusetts State College Association Perspective, 1.

  • Karchmer, R., & Mallette, M. (Eds). (2001). NRC board supports NCTE Resolution on High Stakes Testing. National Reading Conference Newsletter, 6.

  • Kauchak, D. (1984). Testing teachers in Louisiana: A closer look. Phi Delta Kappan, 65(9), 626-628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koplik, S. (1998). A dunce cap on teacher education. The Boston Globe, A17.

  • LaMorte, M.W. (1988). The law and competency testing for teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

  • Massachusetts Department of Education. (2002). Regulations for educator licensure and preparation program approval. Proposed public comment draft. Malden, MA: Author.

  • Massachusetts Tests for Educator Licensure: 2001–2002 registration bulletin. (2001). Malden, MA: Massachusetts Department of Education.

  • Mehren, E. (1998). For would-be Massachusetts teachers, a failing grade. Los Angeles Times, A19.

  • Mehrens, W. (1999). The CBEST saga: Implications for licensure and employment testing. The Bar Examiner, 68(2), 23-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melnick, S., & Pullin, D. (1999). Teacher education & testing in Massachusetts: The issues, the facts, and conclusions for institutions of higher education. Boston: Association of Independent Colleges and Universities of Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michigan Department of Education. (1999). Personal communication with a representative from the Michigan State Board of Education, Lansing: MI.

  • National Evaluation Systems. (1999). Massachusetts Educator Certification Tests technical report. Amherst, MA: Author.

  • Neal, S. (1985). Educators charge test is biased. Augusta Chronicle, B1.

  • New York Department of Education. (1999). New York Department of Education website [On-line]. Available: http://www.nysed.gov.

  • NTE Policy Council. (1983). Guidelines for proper use of NTE tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, P. (1999). FSC will require early testing of teacher candidates. Worcester Telegram & Gazette. [Online]. Available: http://www.telgram.com.

  • Oklahoma Department of Education. (1999). Oklahoma Department of Education website [On-line]. Available: http://www.octp.org/index.htm.

  • Pool, J., Ellett, C.D., Schiavone, S., & Carey-Louis, C. (2001). How valid are the National Board of Professional Teaching Standards assessments for predicting the quality of actual classroom teaching and learning? Results of six mini case studies. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15(1), 31-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, D.S. (1999) Nearly half of would-be teachers still failing certification test. Boston Herald, 12.

  • Reilly, S. (1999). After years, teacher tests still mired in politics, race, history. Mobile Register, 1A, 14A.

  • Richardson v. Lamar County Board of Education, et al., No. 87-T-568-N (M.D. AL, 1989, November).

  • Riley, F. (2001). “Steady” progress on teacher test scores reported. The Boston Globe, C5.

  • Rubinstein, S.A., McDonough, M.W., & Allan, R.G. (1982). The changing nature of teacher certification programs. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New York: NY.

  • Schnittjer, C.J., & Flippo, R.F. (1991). Impact of certification testing on school administrators: The Georgia experience. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 4(3), 293-307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, D. (1999). Personal communication with D. Sharp, Colorado Department of Education, Denver: CO.

  • Silber, J. (1998). Those who can't teach. The New York Times, A15.

  • Slowey, D. (1999). Personal communication with D. Slowey, N.E.S. spokesperson, Amherst: MA.

  • Smith, G.P. (1984). The critical issue of excellence and equity in competency testing. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 6-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soukup, P. (1999). Personal communication with P. Soukup, New Mexico Department of Education, Santa Fe: NM.

  • Texas Department of Education. (July 23, 1999). Personal communication with a representative from the Texas Board of Education, Austin: TX.

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2000a). Addressing the future of Hispanic education. In Community Update, 77, 5. Washington, D.C.: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2000b). Reference and reporting guide for preparing state and institutional reports on the quality of teacher preparation: Title II, Higher Education Act, NCES 2000-089. Washington, D.C.: Author.

  • Zernike, K. (1998a). BU test to screen teacher hopefuls, disclaim failures. The Boston Globe, A1, B8.

  • Zernike, K. (1998b). State moves on teacher test failures. The Boston Globe, A1, A17.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flippo, R.F. Repeating History: Teacher Licensure Testing in Massachusetts. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 16, 211–229 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020861223214

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020861223214

Keywords

Navigation