Skip to main content
Log in

Relationships, Not Boundaries

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The authors find it more useful to payattention to relationships than to boundaries.By focusing attention on bounded, individualpsychological issues, the metaphor ofboundaries can distract helping professionalsfrom thinking about inequities of power. Itoversimplifies a complex issue, inviting us toignore discourses around gender, race, class,culture, and the like that support injustice,abuse, and exploitation. Making boundaries acentral metaphor for ethical practice can keepus from critically examining the effects ofdistance, withdrawal, and non-participation.The authors describe how it is possible toexamine the practical, moral, and ethicaleffects of our participation in relationshipsby focusing on just relationships rather thanon boundaries. They give illustrations andclinical examples of relationally-focusedethical practices that derive from a narrativeapproach to therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Epston D, White M. Experience, Contradiction, Narrative, and Imagination. Adelaide, South Australia: Dulwich Centre Publications, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Freedman J, Combs G. Narrative Therapy: The Social Construction of Preferred Realities. New York: Norton, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Monk G, Winslade J, Crocket K, Epston D, eds. Narrative Therapy in Practice: The Archaeology of Hope. New York: Jossey-Bass, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. White M, Epston D. Narrative Means to Therapeutic Ends. NewYork: W.W. Norton, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zimmerman J, Dickerson V. If Problems Talked: Narrative Therapy in Action. New York: Guilford, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Combs G, Freedman J. Symbol, Story, and Ceremony: Using Metaphor in Individual and Family Therapy. New York: Norton, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Avis JM. The politics of functional family therapy: A feminist critique. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 1985; 11: 127–138.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carter E, Papp P, Silverstein O, Walters M. Mothers and sons, fathers and daughters. Monograph Series 2(1).Washington: The Women's Project in Family Therapy, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gilligan C. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goldner V. Feminism and family therapy. Family Process 1985; 24: 31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hare-Mustin R. A feminist approach to family therapy. Family Process 1978; 17: 181–194.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jordan J, Kaplan A, Baker-Miller J, Stiver I, Surrey J. Women's Growth in Connection: Writings from the Stone Center. New York: Guilford, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Taggart M. The feminist critique in epistemological perspective: Questions of context in family therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 1985; 11: 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Greenspan M. Out of bounds. In: Ragsdale KH, ed. Boundary Wars: Intimacy and Distance in Healing Relationships. Cleveland: The Pilgrim Press, 1996: 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ragsdale KH. Introduction. In: Ragsdale KH, ed. Boundary Wars: Intimacy and Distance in Healing Relationships. Cleveland: The Pilgrim Press, 1996: ix–xxiii.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Coale HW. The Vulnerable Therapist: Practicing Psychotherapy in an Age of Anxiety. New York: The Haworth Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  17. White M. Narratives of Therapist's Lives. Adelaide, Australia: Dulwich Centre Publications, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Myerhoff B. Life history among the elderly: Performance, visibility, and remembering. In: Ruby J, ed. A Crack in the Mirror: Reflexive Perspectives in Anthropology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Geertz C. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  20. McLean C. Editorial. Dulwich Centre Newsletter 1994; 2 and 3: 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tamasese K, Waldegrave C. Cultural and gender accountability in the ‘Just Therapy’ approach. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy 1993; 5(2): 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  22. White M. Deconstruction and therapy. Dulwich Centre Newsletter 1991; 3: 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Andersen T. The reflecting team: Dialogue and metadialogue in clinical work. Family Process 1987; 26: 415–428.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Andersen T, ed. The Reflecting Team: Dialogues and Dialogues about the Dialogues. New York: Norton, 1991.

  25. Griffith JL, Griffith ME. The Body Speaks: Therapeutic Dialogues for Mind-Body Problems. New York: Basic Books, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Epston D. Internalizing discourses versus externalizing discourses. In: Gilligan S, Price R, eds. Therapeutic Conversations. New York: Norton, 1993: 161–177.

    Google Scholar 

  27. White M. Commentary: The histories of the present. In: Gilligan S, Price R, eds. Therapeutic Conversations. New York: Norton, 1993: 121–135.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Combs, G., Freedman, J. Relationships, Not Boundaries. Theor Med Bioeth 23, 203–217 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020847408829

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020847408829

Navigation