Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Genetic impoverishment and cross-incompatibility in remnant genotypes of Ziziphus celata (Rhamnaceae), a rare shrub endemic to the Lake Wales Ridge, Florida

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The loss of genetic diversity in fragmented populations ofself-incompatible plant species may result in sexual reproductive failure andlocal extinctions. Florida ziziphus (Ziziphus celata) is aself-incompatible clonal shrub known only from five genetically depauperatepopulations on the Lake Wales Ridge, Florida, USA. Recovery of this speciesrequires identification of cross-compatible genotypes that can be used to createviable (i.e., sexually reproducing) populations. To further development of arecovery program for this highly imperiled species, we investigated its geneticstructure and sexual reproductive viability. We used random amplifiedpolymorphic DNAs (RAPDs) to investigate genetic variability within remnantpopulations and we conducted experimental compatibility trials to determine thecross-compatibility of remnant genotypes. One hundred and ninety-nine uniquestem samples collected from one ex situ and fivein situ populations were assayed for the presence orabsence of a band for 32 RAPD markers. Based on unweighted pair-group meancluster analysis (UPGMA), only 11 multi-locus genotypes (MLGs) were identified.Eight of these MLGs correspond to MLGs identified in an earlier allozyme study.In addition, we identified three new RAPD-based MLGs. Three of the five naturalpopulations consisted of only one MLG, while the largest and most geneticallydiverse population comprised only four MLGs. Coefficients of similarity rangedfrom 96.6% for the most closely related MLGs to 20.7% for the most distantlyrelated. The compatibility trials demonstrated that most MLGs arecross-incompatible. With 69% of all possible one-way crosses tested (38/55), wehave identified only eight compatible crosses via germination trials. Based onthe results of the compatibility trials, we assigned MLGs toself-incompatibility (SI) mating types. On present evidence, the currentbreeding population of Florida ziziphus may comprise as few as two SI matingtypes. These SI mating types will be used to guide future breeding efforts andan experimental introduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aagaard J.E., Krutovskii K.V. and Strauss S.H. 1998. RAPDs and allozymes exhibit similar levels of diversity and differentiation among populations and races of Douglas-fir. Heredity 81: 69–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel F.M., Brent R., Kingston R.E., Moore D.D., Seidman J.G., Smith J.A. et al. 1987. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayers D.R. and Ryan F.J. 1997. The clonal and population structure of a rare endemic plant, Wyethia reticulata (Asteraceae): allozyme and RAPD analysis. Molecular Ecology 6: 761–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayers D.R. and Ryan F.J. 1999. Genetic diversity and structure of the narrow endemicWyethia reticulata and its congener W.bolanderi (Asteraceae) using RAPD and allozyme techniques. American Journal of Botany 86: 344–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett S.C.H. and Kohn J.R. 1991. Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: implications for conservation. In: Falk D.A. and Holsinger K.E. (eds), Genetics and Conservation of Rare Plants. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauner S., Crawford D.J. and Stuessy T.F. 1992. Ribosomal DNA and RAPD variation in the rare plant family Lactoridaceae. American Journal of Botany 79: 1436–1439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown A.H.D. 1992. Human impact on plant gene pools and sampling for their conservation. Oikos 63: 109–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth D. and Charlesworth B. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 237–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christman S.P. and Judd W.S. 1990. Notes on plants endemic to Florida scrub. Florida Scientist 53: 52–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coile N.C. 2000. Notes on Florida's Endangered and Threatened Plants. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry, Gainesville, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLaney K.R., Wunderlin R.P. and Hansen B.E. 1989. Rediscovery of Ziziphus celata (Rhamnaceae). Sida Contributions to Botany 13: 325–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMauro M.M. 1993. Relationship of breeding system to rarity in the Lakeside Daisy (Hymenoxys acaulis var. glabra). Conservation Biology 7: 542–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMauro M.M. 1994. Development and implementation of a recovery program for the federally threatened Lakeside daisy (Hymenoxys acaulis var. glabra). In: Bowles M.L. and Whelan C.J. (eds), Restoration of Endangered Species. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 298–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson O. and Bremer B. 1993. Genet dynamics of the clonal plant Rubus saxatilis. Journal of Ecology 81: 533–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk D.A., Millar C.I. and Olwell M. 1996. Restoring Diversity: Strategies for Reintroduction of Endangered Plants. Island Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel O.H., Brown A.H.D. and Burdon J.J. 1995. The Conservation of Plant Biodiversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godt M.J.W., Hamrick J.L. and Bratton S. 1995. Genetic diversity on a threatened wetland species, Helonias bullata (Liliaceae). Conservation Biology 9: 596–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godt M.J.W., Race T. and Hamrick J.L. 1997. A population genetic analysis of Ziziphus celata, an endangered Florida shrub. Journal of Heredity 88: 531–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon D.R. 1994. Translocation of species into conservation areas: a key for natural resource managers. Natural Areas Journal 14: 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon D.R. and Kubisiak T.L. 1998. RAPD analysis of the last population of a likely Florida Keys endemic cactus. Florida Scientist 61: 203–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrant E.O. Jr 1996. Designing populations: demographic, genetic, and horticultural dimensions. In: Falk D.A., Millar C.I. and Olwell M. (eds), Restoring Diversity: Strategies for Reintroduction of Endangered Plants. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 171–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick J.L. and Godt M.J.W. 1990. Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: Brown A.H.D., Clegg M.G., Kohler A.L. and Weir B.S. (eds), Plant Population Genetics, Breeding and Genetic Resources. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp. 43–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison S. and Bruna E. 1999. Habitat fragmentation and large-scale conservation: what do we know for sure? Ecography 22: 225–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartl D.L. 1988. A Primer of Population Genetics. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huenneke L.F. 1991. Ecological implications of genetic variation. In: Falk D.A. and Holsinger K.E. (eds), Genetics and Conservation of Rare Plants. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isabel N., Beaulieu J. and Bousquet J. 1995. Complete congruence between gene diversity estimates derived from genotypic data at enzyme and random amplified polymorphic DNA loci in black spruce. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 92: 6369–6373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones B. and Gliddon C. 1999. Reproductive biology and genetic structure in Lloydia serotina. Plant Ecology 141: 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd W.S. and Hall D.W. 1984. A new species of Ziziphus (Rhamnaceae) from Florida. Rhodora 86: 381–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp E.E. and Dyer A.R. 1998.When do genetic considerations require special approaches to ecological restoration? In: Fiedler P.L. and Kareiva P.M. (eds), Conservation Biology for the Coming Decade. Chapman & Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwak M.M., Velterop O. and van Andel J. 1998. Pollen and gene flow in fragmented habitats. Applied Vegetation Science 1: 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande R. 1998. Anthropogenic, ecological and genetic factors in extinction and conservation. Researches on Population Ecology 40: 259–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Les D.H., Reinartz J.A. and Esselman E.J. 1991. Genetic consequences of rarity in Aster furcatus (Asteraceae), a threatened, self-incompatible plant. Evolution 45: 1641–1650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luijten S.H. 2001. Reproduction and genetics of fragmented plant populations, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald D.B. and Hamrick J.L. 1996. Genetic variation in some plants of Florida scrub. American Journal of Botany 83: 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menges E.S. 1999. Florida scrub. In: Anderson R.C., Fralish J.S. and Baskin J.M. (eds), The Savanna, Barren, and Rock Outcrop Plant Communities of North America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menges E.S., Dolan R.W., Yahr R. and Gordon D.R. 2001. Comparative genetics of seven plants endemic to Florida's Lake Wales Ridge. Castanea 66: 98–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers R.L. 1990. Scrub and high pine. In: Myers R.L. and Ewel J.J. (eds), Ecosystems of Florida. University of Central Florida Press, Orlando, Florida, pp. 150–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 70: 3321–3323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M. 1975. Molecular Population Genetics and Evolution. Elsevier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss R.F. and Cooperrider A.Y. 1994. Saving Nature's Legacy: Protecting and Restoring Biodiversity. Island Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palacios C. and Gonzalez-Candelas F. 1997. Analysis of population genetic structure and variability using RAPD markers in the endemic and endangered Limonium dufourii (Plumbaginaceae). Molecular Ecology 6: 1107–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlik B.M., Nickrent D.L. and Howald A.M. 1993. Creating a new population of Amsinckia grandiflora. Conservation Biology 7: 510–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlik B.M. 1996. Defining and measuring success. In: Falk D.A., Millar C.I. and Olwell M. (eds), Restoring Diversity: Strategies for Reintroduction of Endangered Plants. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 127–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez H.E. 2001. Germination of six Florida native endangered species, M.A. Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peroni P.A. and Abrahamson W.G. 1986. A rapid method of determining losses of native vegetation. Natural Areas Journal 5: 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards A.J. 1986. Plant Breeding Systems. Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf F.J. 1994. NTSYS-pc Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, version 1.80. Exeter Software, Setauket, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders D., Hobbs R.J. and Margules C.R. 1991. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conservation Biology 5: 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Conservation Service 1989. Soil survey of Highlands County, Florida. United States Department of Agriculture, Gainesville, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Conservation Service 1990. Soil survey of Polk County, Florida. United States Department of Agriculture, Gainesville, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinger T., Korner C. and Schmid B. 1996. Long-term persistence in a changing climate: DNA analysis suggests very old ages of clones of alpine Carex curvula. Oecologia 105: 94–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson A.G. 1981. Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12: 253–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Fish and Wildlife Service 1999. Florida Ziziphus. In: Multi-Species Recovery Plan for the Threatened and Endangered Species of South Florida. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, Georgia, pp. 1986–1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Buren R., Harper K.T., AndersenW.R., Stanton D.J., Seyoum S. and England J.L. 1994. Evaluating the relationship of autumn buttercup (Ranunculus acriformis var. aestivalis) to some close congeners using random amplified polymorphic DNA. American Journal of Botany 81: 514–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner D.B., Furnier G.R., Saghai-Maroof M.A., Williams S.M., Dancik B.P. and Allard R.W. 1987. Chloroplast DNA polymorphisms in lodgepole and jack pines and their hybrids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 84: 2097–2100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warburton C.L., James E.A., Fripp Y.J., Trueman S.J. and Wallace H.M. 2000. Clonality and sexual reproductive failure in remnant populations of Santalum lanceolatum (Santalaceae). Biological Conservation 96: 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weekley C.W. and Race T.M. 1999. 10-Year status report on Ziziphus celata, a federally listed endemic plant of the Lake Wales Ridge, Florida. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Vero Beach, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weekley C.W. and Race T. 2001. The breeding system of Ziziphus celata Judd and D. Hall (Rhamnaceae), a rare endemic plant of the Lake Wales Ridge, Florida. Biological Conservation 100: 207–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller S.G. 1994. The relationship of rarity to plant reproductive biology. In: Bowles M.L. and Whelan C.J. (eds), Restoration of Endangered Species. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 90–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove D.S., McLellan C.H. and Dobson A.P. 1986. Habitat fragmentation in the temperate zone. In: Soule M.E. (ed.), Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp. 237–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams J.G.K., Kubelik A.R., Livak K.J., Rafalski J.A. and Tingey S.V. 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Research 18: 6531–6535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong K.C. and Sun M. 1999. Reproductive biology and conservation genetics of Goodyera procera (Orchidaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 1406–1413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlin R.P. 1998. Guide to the Vascular Plants of Florida. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young A., Boyle T. and Brown T. 1996. The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. TREE 11: 413–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young A.G., Brown A.H.D. and Zich F.A. 1999. Genetic structure of fragmentated populations of the endangered daisy Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides. Conservation Biology 13: 256–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZomleferW.B. 1989. Flowering Plants of Florida: A Guide to Common Families. Biological Illustrations, Inc., Gainesville, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Archbold Biological Station, Lake Placid, USA

    C.W. Weekley

  2. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Southern Institute of Forest Genetics, 23332, Highway 67, Saucier, USA

    T.L. Kubisiak

  3. Trout Lake Nature Center, Eustis, 32727, USA

    T.M. Race

Authors
  1. C.W. Weekley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T.L. Kubisiak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T.M. Race
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weekley, C., Kubisiak, T. & Race, T. Genetic impoverishment and cross-incompatibility in remnant genotypes of Ziziphus celata (Rhamnaceae), a rare shrub endemic to the Lake Wales Ridge, Florida. Biodiversity and Conservation 11, 2027–2046 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020810800820

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020810800820

Search

Navigation