Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 11, Issue 6, pp 823–832 | Cite as

Lek Behavior as the Mating Strategy of Setellia sp. (Diptera: Richardiidae)

  • Marcio R. Pie


A field study revealed that the mating system of the richardiid Setellia sp. meets even the most stringent definition of lek behavior. Males remain on the upper surface of the leaves of Saranthe aff. klotzchiana (Maranthaceae), where they perform ritualized displays related to courtship and territorial behavior. Correlational data support the existence of reproductive dominance hierarchies, which are based on both male vs. male and female vs. female agonistic interactions. Curiously, the behavioral acts performed by Setellia sp. show remarkable similarities to other nonrelated dipteran lekkers. Aspects of evolution and convergence of these behaviors in the Acalyptratae are considered.

mating system courtship behavior agression lek behavior Richardiidae Setellia 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alcock, J., and Pyle, D. W. (1979). The complex courtship behavior of Physiphora demandata (F.) (Diptera: Otitidae). Z. Tierpsychol. 49: 352–362.Google Scholar
  2. Boake, C. R. B. (1986). A method for testing adaptive hypothesis of mate choice. Am. Nat. 127: 654–666.Google Scholar
  3. Borror, D. J., Triplehorn, C. A., and Johnson, M. F. (1991). An Introduction to the Study of Insects, Saunders College, Chicago.Google Scholar
  4. Bradbury, J. W. (1985). Contrasts between insects and vertebrates in the evolution of male display, female choice and lek mating. Fort. Zool. 31: 273–289.Google Scholar
  5. Burk, T. (1981). Signaling and sex in acalyptratae flies. Fla. Entomol. 64: 30–43.Google Scholar
  6. Burla, H. (1990). Lek behavior in the hypercephalic Zygothrica dispar Wiedemann (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Z. Zool. Syst. Evolut.-forsch. 28: 69–77.Google Scholar
  7. Dodson, G. (1986). Lek mating system and large male aggressive advantage in a gall-forming tephritid fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ethology 72: 99–108.Google Scholar
  8. Höglund, J., and Alatalo, R. (1995). Leks, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  9. Hoikkala, A., and Welbergen, P. (1995). Signals of females and males in successful and unsuccessful courtships of three Hawaiian lek-mating Drosophila species. Anim. Behav. 50: 177–190.Google Scholar
  10. McAlpine, D. K. (1979). Agonistic behavior in Achias australis (Diptera: Platystomatidae) and the significance of eyestalks. In Blum, M. S., and Blum, N. A. (eds.), Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Oldroyd, H. (1964). The Natural History of Flies, W. W. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Parsons, P. A. (1977). Lek behavior in Drosophila (Hirtodrosophila) polypori Malloch—An Australian rainforest species. Evolution 31: 223–225.Google Scholar
  13. Peixoto, A. L., and Gentry, A. (1990). Diversidade and Composição Florística de Mata de Tabuleiro na Reserva Florestal de Linhares (Espírito Santo, Brasil). Rev. Brasil. Bot. 13: 19–25.Google Scholar
  14. Shelly, T. E. (1987). Lek behavior of a Hawaiian Drosophila: Male spacing, aggression and female visitation. Anim. Behav. 35: 1394–1404.Google Scholar
  15. Shelly, T. E. (1988). Lek behavior of Drosophila cnecopleura in Hawaii. Ecol. Entomol. 13: 51–55.Google Scholar
  16. Spieth, T. H. (1974). Courtship behavior in Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 19: 385–405.Google Scholar
  17. Spieth, H. T. (1981). Drosophila heteroneura and Drosophila silvestris: Head shapes, behavior and evolution. Evolution 35: 921–930.Google Scholar
  18. Steyskal, G. C. (1987). Richardiidae. In McAlpine, J. F. (ed.), Manual of Neartic Diptera, Research Branch, Agriculture Canada.Google Scholar
  19. Thornhill, R., and Alcock, J. (1983). The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  20. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (ed.), Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 1871–1971.Google Scholar
  21. Trivers, R. L., and Willard, D. E. (1973). Natural selection of parental ability to vary sex ratio of offspring. Science 179: 90–92.Google Scholar
  22. Whittier, T. S., and Kaneshiro, K. Y. (1995). Intersexual selection in the mediterranean fruit fly: Does female choice enhance fitness? Evolution 49: 990–996.Google Scholar
  23. Zwolfer, H. (1974). Innerartliche Kommunikationssysteme bei Bohrfliegen. Biol. unser. Zeit 4: 147–153.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcio R. Pie
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de ZoologiaUniversidade Estadual de CampinasCampinas SPBrazil

Personalised recommendations