Skip to main content
Log in

Mucinous Cancers have Fewer Genomic Alterations than More Common Classes of Breast Cancer

  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mucinous cancers of the breast are distinguished histologically by their abundant pools of mucin and low degree of nuclear pleomorphism. Relative to the more common breast cancers of no distinctive type (ductal carcinoma), mucinous cancers have a relatively favorable prognosis. In a study of chromosomal changes in mucinous cancers, we evaluated the extent of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at chromosomal regions commonly deleted in usual infiltrating ductal carcinoma, including markers on chromosomal arms 1p, 1q, 3p, 6q, 8p, 9p, 11p, 11q, 13q, 16q, 17p, and 17q. Remarkably, we found an average frequency of LOH of only 1.9 of these 12 chromosomal arms in 18 cases of mucinous carcinoma, compared to an average frequency of LOH of 6.4 of these same chromosomal arms in cases of infiltrating ductal cancer. In three of the 18 cases of mucinous carcinoma studied, including one case with regional lymph node metastases, no LOH was seen at any of the 12 chromosomal regions studied. We considered the possibility of other chromosomal loci being more commonly affected in mucinous cancers and conducted comparative genomic hybridization on six of the cases. These studies demonstrated a low overall frequency of genomic copy number changes (mean of 3.1 changes per case) and failed to reveal any other chromosomal locus with frequent losses that had not been evaluated by microsatellite analysis. Together, these data indicate that mucinous cancers of the breast do not have the extensive genomic alterations that are typically found in more common variants of breast cancer. Thus, mucinous cancers most likely have less genetic instability than most other forms of breast cancer and the molecular pathogenesis of this form of breast cancer is likely to be substantially different than that of usual ductal breast cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Loeb LA: A mutator phenotype in cancer. Cancer Res 61: 3230–3239, 2001

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B: Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature 396: 643–649, 1998

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fujii H, Zhou W, Gabrielson E: Detection of frequent allelic loss of 6q23-q25.2 in microdissected human breast cancer tissues. Gene Chromosome Canc 16: 35–39, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fujii H, Marsh C, Cairns P, Sidransky D, Gabrielson E: Genetic divergence in the clonal evolution of breast cancer. Cancer Res 56: 1493–1497, 1996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fujii H, Szumel R, Marsh C, Zhou W, Gabrielson E: Genetic progression, histological grade, and allelic loss in ductal car-cinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer Res 56: 5260–5265, 1996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Anbazhagan R, Fujii H, Gabrielson E: Allelic loss of chromo-somal arm 8p in breast cancer progression. Am J Pathol 152: 815–819, 1998

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Trink B, Pai SI, Spunt SL, Raman V, Cairns P, Jen J, Gabrielson E, Sukumar S, Sidransky D: Absence of TSG101 transcript abnormalities in human cancers. Oncogene 16: 2815–2818, 1998

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Isola JJ, Kallioniemi OP, Chu LW, Fuqua SA, Hilsenbeck SG, Osborne CK, Waldman FM: Genetic aberrations detected by comparative genomic hybridization predict outcome in node-negative breast cancer. Am J Pathol 147: 905–911, 1995

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nishizaki T, DeVries S, Chew K, Goodson 3rd, WH, Ljung BM, Thor A, Waldman FM: Genetic alterations in primary breast cancers and their metastases: direct comparison using modified comparative genomic hybridization. Gene Chromosome Canc 19: 267–272, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  10. Isola J, Chu L, DeVries S, Matsumura K, Chew K, Ljung BM, Waldman FM: Genetic alterations in ERBB2-amplified breast carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 5: 4140–4145, 1999

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Waldman FM, Hwang ES, Etzell J, Eng C, DeVries S, Bennington J, Thor A: Genomic alterations in tubular breast carcinomas. Hum Pathol 32: 222–226, 2001

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rasmussen BB, Rose C, Christensen IB: Prognostic factors in primary mucinous breast carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 87: 155–160, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Avisar E, Khan MA, Axelrod D, Oza K: Pure mucinous car-cinoma of the breast: a clinicopathologic correlation study. Ann Surg Oncol 5: 447–451, 1998

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Diab SG, Clark GM, Osborne CK, Libby A, Allred DC, Elledge RM: Tumor characteristics and clinical outcome of tubular and mucinous breast carcinomas. J Clin Oncol 17: 1442–1448, 1999

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Anbazhagan R, Fujii H, Gabrielson E: Microsatellite instability is uncommon in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 5: 839–844, 1999

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. O'Connell P, Pekkel V, Fuqua SA, Osborne CK, Clark GM, Allred DC: Analysis of loss of heterozygosity in 399 premalignant breast lesions at 15 genetic loci. J Natl Cancer I 90: 697–703, 1998

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fujii, H., Anbazhagan, R., Bornman, D.M. et al. Mucinous Cancers have Fewer Genomic Alterations than More Common Classes of Breast Cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 76, 255–260 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020808020873

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020808020873

Navigation