Skip to main content
Log in

A Randomized Phase II Study of Two Schedules of Bryostatin-1 (NSC339555) in Patients with Advanced Malignant Melanoma – A National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study

  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: This study addressed theefficacy and toxicity of the novel compoundBryostatin-1 (NSC 339555), a novel agentwith antineoplastic, hematopoietic andimmunomodulatory activity in a variety ofin vitro and in vivo systems.

Patients and methods: This phase IIstudy randomly assignedchemotherapy-naïve patients withuntreated metastatic melanoma andmeasurable disease to two schedules oftreatment: Arm A, 25 μg/m2bryostatin-1 given as a 24 hour continuousinfusion weekly or Arm B,120 μg/m2 bryostatin-1 given as a72 hour continuous infusion every 2 weeks.Although objective response was assessedusing standard NCIC CTG criteria,antitumour activity was assessed using amultivariate endpoint incorporating bothresponse (CR and PR) and early progression(PD at ≤ 8 weeks). Seventeen patientswere randomized to each arm.

Results: Arm A was better tolerated with 86.7% of15 evaluable patients receiving ≥ 90%of planned dose intensity versus 76.5% of17 evaluable patients in Arm B. On Arm B,three patients experienced serious adverseevents and three patients had to be removedfrom protocol therapy due to toxicity. Themost common side effect was myalgia (33%grade 1–2 on Arm A versus 65% on Arm Bwith 5 patients experiencing grade 3 andone patient grade 4). Lethargy was morecommon on Arm A but more severe on Arm B. Other side effects such as nausea, diarrheaand headache were generally mild tomoderate in nature and occurred with asimilar frequency on both arms. Hematologicand biochemical toxicity were minimal. This trial was closed early because theprotocol-stopping rule was met based onlack of required responses and on thenumber of early progressions on both arms.No partial or complete responses were seen;3 patients randomized to Arm A had stabledisease (duration 9–24 weeks) as did 4patients (duration 10–38 weeks) randomizedto Arm B.

Conclusion: Arm A wasbetter tolerated than Arm B. We concludethat bryostatin-1 has little efficacy inthe treatment of metastatic melanoma witheither of the schedules studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pettit GR, Herald CL, Doubeck DL, Herald DL: Isolation and structure of bryostatin-1. J Am Chem Soc 104:6846–6848, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hess AD, Silanskis MK, Esa AH, Pettit GR, May WS: Activation of human T lymphocytes by bryostatin-1. J Immunol 141:3263–3269, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berkow RL, Kraft AS: Bryostatin, a non-phorbol ester macrocyclic lactone, activates intact human polymorphonuclear leukocytes and binds to the phorbol ester receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 131:1109–1116, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  4. May WS, Sharkis SJ, Esa AH, Gebbia V, Kraft AS, Pettit GR, Sensenbrenner LL: Antineoplastic bryostatins are multipotential stimulators of human hematopoietic progenitor cells. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 84:8483–8487, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  5. Asieud C, Biggs J, Lilly M, Kraft AS: Inhibition of leukemic cell growth by the protein kinase C activator bryostatin-1 correlates with the dephosphorylation of cyclin dependent kinase 2. Cancer Res 55:3716–3720, 1995 (abstr)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Esa AH, Boto WO, Adler WH, May WS, Hess AD: Activation of T-cells by bryostatins: induction of the IL-2 receptor gene transcription and down-modulation of surface receptors. Int J Immunopharmacol 12:481–490, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lilly M, Vo K, Le T, Takahashi G: Bryostatin-1 acts synergistically with interleukin-1 alpha to induce secretion of g-csf and other cytokines from marrow stromal cells. Exper Hematol 24:621, 1996 (abstr)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kraft AS, Woodley S, Pettit GR, Gao F, Coll JC, Wagner F: Comparison of the antitumor activity of bryostatins 1, 5, and 8. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 37:271–278, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  9. Szallasi Z, Du L, Levine R, Lewin NE, Nguyen PN, Williams MD, Pettit GR, Blumberg PM: The bryostatins inhibit growth of B16/F10 melanoma cells in vitro through a protein kinase C-independent mechanism: dissociation of activities using 26-epi-bryostatin-1. Cancer Res 56:2105–2111, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  10. Philip PA, Rea D, Thavasu P, Carmichael J, Stuart NS, Rockett H, Talbot DC, Ganesan T, Pettit GR, Balkwill F, Harris AL: Phase I study of bryostatin-1: assessment of interleukin 6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha induction in vivo. The Cancer Research Campaign Phase I Committee. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:1812–1818, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zee B, Melnychuk D, Dancey J, Eisenhauer E: Design of phase II clinical trials incorporating response and early progression. Controlled Clin Trials 17(2S):85S, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dent S, Zee B, Dancey J, Hanauske A, Wanders J, Eisenhauer E: Application of a new multinomial phase II stopping rule using response and early progression. J Clin Oncol 19(3):785–791, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fleming TR: One sample multiple testing procedure for phase II clinical trials. Biometrics 38:143–151, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  14. Propper DJ, Macaulay V, O'Byrne KJ, Braybrooke JP, Wilner SM, Ganesan TS, Talbot DC, Harris AL: A phase II study of bryostatin-1 in metastatic malignant melanoma. Br J Cancer 78:1337–1341, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bedikian A, Plager C, Papadopoulos N, Eton O, Ellerhorst J, Smith T: Phase II trial of bryostatin-1 in patients with melanoma. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncology. 18:523a, 1999 (abstr)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gonzalez R, Ebbinghaus S, Henthorn T, Miller D, Kraft S: Treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma with bryostatin-1 - a phase II study. Melanoma Res 9:599–606, 1999 (abstr)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schuchter LM, Esa AH, May WS, Laulis MK, Pettit GR, Hess AD: Successful treatment of murine melanoma with bryostatin-1. Cancer Res 51:682–687, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  18. Varterasian ML, Mohammad RM, Shurafa MS, Hulburd K, Pemberton PA, Rodriguez DH, Spadoni V, Eilender DS, Murgo A, Wall N, Dan M, Al-Katib AM: Phase II trial of bryostatin-1 in patients with relapsed low grade non-hodgkins lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 6:825–828, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kamanda W, Smith M, Mohammad RM, Al K: Quantitative RT-PCR for mdr1 RNA in cell lines and in xenografts after bryostatin-1. Proc Ann Meeting Am Assoc Cancer Res 35:A3248, 1994 (abstr)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Scala S, Dickstein B, Regis J, Szallasi J, Blumberg P, Bates S: Bryostatin-1 affects P-glycoprotein phosphorylation but not function in multidrug-resistant human breast cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res 1:1581–1587, 2000

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tozer, R., Burdette-Radoux, S., Berlanger, K. et al. A Randomized Phase II Study of Two Schedules of Bryostatin-1 (NSC339555) in Patients with Advanced Malignant Melanoma – A National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study. Invest New Drugs 20, 407–412 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020694425356

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020694425356

Navigation