Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bank Cost Efficiency and Output Specification

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a longstanding controversy over precisely what it is that banks produce. However, there is little evidence on the sensitivity of bank cost efficiency results when different output definitions are applied. This paper does exactly that. In particular, we compare nonparametric efficiency scores yielded by two output specifications, one mainly identified with the asset approach and the other which also considers deposits as output. Results show that distributions of efficiency scores, estimated nonparametrically by means of kernel smoothing, vary greatly. In addition, firms' positions relative to the mean change according to either output definition, and results do not remain constant over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, I. S. (1982). “On Bandwidth Variation in Kernel Estimates—A Square Root Law.” Annals of Statistics 9, 168–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altunba?, Y., L. Evans and P. Molyneux. (2001a). “Bank Ownership and Efficiency.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 33(4), 926–954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altunba?, Y., L. Evans and P. Molyneux. (2001b). “Efficiency in European Banking.” European Economic Review 45, 1931–1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, P. W., A. N. Berger, G. D. Ferrier and D. B. Humphrey. (1998). “Consistency Conditions for Regulatory Analysis of Financial Institutions: A Comparison of Frontier Efficiency Methods.” Journal of Economics and Business 50(2), 85–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, S. A., F. R. Førsund and E. S. Jansen. (1992). “Technical Efficiency of Norwegian Banks: The Non-Parametric Approach to Efficiency Measurement.” The Journal of Productivity Analysis 2, 127–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N. and R. DeYoung. (2002). “The Effects of Geographic Expansion on Bank Efficiency.” Journal of Financial Services Research, forthcoming.

  • Berger, A. N., G. A. Hanweck and D. B. Humphrey. (1987). “Competitive Viability in Banking: Scale, Scope, and Product Mix Economies.” Journal of Monetary Economics 20, 501–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N. and D. B. Humphrey. (1992). “Measurement and Efficiency Issues in Commercial Banking.” In Z. Griliches (ed.), Output Measurement in the Service Sectors, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 245–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N. and D. B. Humphrey. (1997). “Efficiency of Financial Institutions: International Survey and Directions for Future Research.” European Journal of Operational Research 98, 175–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., J. H. Leusner and J. J. Mingo. (1997). “The Efficiency of Bank Branches.” Journal of Monetary Economics 40, 141–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N. and L. J. Mester. (2001). “Explaining the Dramatic Changes in Performance of U.S. Banks: Technological Change, Deregulation, and Dynamic Changes in Competition.” Working Paper 01-6, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.

  • Clark, J. A. (1996). “Economimic Cost, Scale Efficiency, and CompetitiveViability in Banking.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 28, 342–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietsch, M. and A. Lozano-Vivas. (2000). “How the Environment Determines Banking Efficiency. A Comparison Between French and Spanish Industries.” Journal of Banking and Finance 24, 985–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Y. and A. Ullah. (1999). “On Goodness-of-Fit Tests forWeekly Dependent Processes using Kernel Method.” Journal of Nonparametric Statistics 11, 337–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favero, C. A. and L. Papi. (1995). “Technical Efficiency and Scale Efficiency in the Italian Banking Sector: A Non-Parametric Approach.” Applied Economics 27, 385–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier, G. D. and C. A. K. Lovell. (1990). “Measuring Cost Efficiency in Banking.” Journal of Econometrics 46, 229–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuentelsaz, L. and J. Gómez. (2001). “Strategic and Queue Effects on Entry in Spanish Banking.” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 10(4), 529–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuentelsaz, L., J. Gómez and Y. Polo. (2002). “Followers' Entry Timing: Evidence from the Spanish Banking Sector after Deregulation.” Strategic Management Journal 23(3), 245–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, D. (1991). A Theory of Production for the Financial Firm. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, W. C. and S. Timme. (1995). “Core Deposits and Physical Capital: A Reexamination of Bank Scale Economies and Efficiency with Quasi-Fixed Inputs.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 27, 165–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. A. (1971). “A Theory of the Banking Firm.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 3, 261–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S. C., A. Lozano-Vivas, C. A. K. Lovell and I. Hasan. (2001). “The Effects of Deregulation on the Performance of Financial Institutions: The Case of Spanish Savings Banks.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 33(1), 101–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuussaari, H. (1993). “Productive Efficiency in Finnish Local Banking during 1985-1990.” Discussion Paper 14/93, Bank of Finland.

  • Li, Q. (1996). “Nonparametric Testing of Closeness between Two Unknown Distribution Functions.” Econometric Reviews 15, 261–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd-Williams, D. M., P. Molyneux and J. Thornton. (1994). “Market Structure and Performance in Spanish Banking.” Journal of Banking and Finance 18, 433–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, P. H. and D. A. McManus. (1993). “Resolving the Scale Efficiency Puzzle in Banking.” Journal of Banking and Finance 17, 389–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, K. and N. M. Onvural. (1996). “Economies of Scale and Scope at Large Commercial Banks: Evidence from the Fourier Flexible Functional Form.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 28, 178–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, B. U. and J. S. Marron. (1990). “Comparison of Data-Driven Bandwidth Selectors.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 85(409), 66–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, B. U. and B. A. Turlach. (1992). “Practical Performance of Several Data-Driven Bandwidth Selectors.” Computational Statistics 7, 251–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez, F. and E. Tortosa-Ausina. (2001). “Product Mix of the Spanish Banking Firms: Do Competition Clubs Exist?” In E. P. M. Gardener and P. C. Versluijs (eds.), Bank Strategies and Challenges in the New Europe, Chapter 8. Hampshire/New York: Palgrave, pp. 139–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, D. T. (1996). “Empirics for Economic Growth and Convergence.” European Economic Review 40, 1353–1375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resti, A. (1997). “Evaluating the Cost-Efficiency of the Italian Banking System: What can be Learned from the Joint Application of Parametric and Non-Parametric Techniques?” Journal of Banking and Finance 21, 221–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. W. (1992). Multivariate Density Estimation: Theory, Practice, and Visualization. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sealey, C. W. and J. T. Lindley. (1977). “Inputs, Outputs and a Theory of Production and Cost at Depository Financial Institutions.” Journal of Finance 32(4), 1251–1266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheather, S. J. and M. C. Jones. (1991). “A Reliable Data-Based Bandwidth Selection Method for Kernel Density Estimation.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B 53(3), 683–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, B. W. (1986). Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simar, L. and P. W. Wilson. (1998). “Sensitivity Analysis of Efficiency Scores: How to Bootstrap in Nonparametric Frontier Models.” Management Science 44(1), 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simar, L. and P. W. Wilson. (2000). “Statistical Inference in Nonparametric Frontier Models: The State of the Art.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 13(1), 49–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonoff, J. S. (1996). Smoothing Methods in Statistics. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokey, N. L. and R. E. Lucas. (1989). Recursive Methods in Economic Dynamics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrell, G. R. and D. W. Scott. (1992). “VariableKernel Density Estimation.” Annals of Statistics 20(3), 1236–1265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdmanis, V. (1992). “Sensitivity Analysis for DEA Models. An Empirical Example using Public vs. NFP Hospitals.” Journal of Public Economics 48(2), 185–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, G. and J. R. Blum. (1979). “Probability Density Estimation using Delta Sequences.” Annals of Statistics 7(2), 328–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wand, M. P. and M. C. Jones. (1994). “Multivariate Plug-in Bandwidth Selection.” Computational Statistics 9, 97–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wand, M. P. and M. C. Jones. (1995). Kernel Smoothing. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelock, D. C. and P. W. Wilson. (2001). “New Evidence on Returns to Scale and Product Mix among US Commercial Banks.” Journal of Monetary Economics 47, 653–674.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tortosa-Ausina, E. Bank Cost Efficiency and Output Specification. Journal of Productivity Analysis 18, 199–222 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020685526732

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020685526732

Navigation