Skip to main content
Log in

Analyzing Biomass Conversion into Liquid Hydrocarbons

  • Published:
Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Variants of the Fischer–Tropsch producer-gas conversion into liquid hydrocarbons are analyzed under the assumption that thermodynamic equilibrium is attained in the reactions occurring in the biomass gasification. When the raw material is wood waste, the optimum variant of the process involves partial biomass oxidation by atmospheric oxygen with tail-gas recycling after the separation of liquid hydrocarbons. Before mixing with fresh producer gas, the hydrocarbons contained in the tail gas are reformed on a nickel catalyst.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Kaltschmitt, M. and Dinkelbach, L., Biomass for Energy in Europe, Biomass Gasification and Pyrolysis, Kaltschmitt, M. and Bridgwater, A.V., Eds., Newbury: CPL, 1997, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beenackers, A.A.C.M. and Manaistis, K., Gasification Technologies for Heat and Power from Biomass, Biomass Gasification and Pyrolysis, Kaltschmitt, M. and Bridgwater, A.V., Eds., Newbury: CPL, 1997, p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Storch, H., Golumbic, N., and Anderson, R., The Fischer–Tropsch and Related Synthesis, New York: Wiley, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Di Blassi, C., Dynamic Model of Fixed Bed Biomass Gasification Reactors, Biomass Gasification and Pyrolysis, Kaltschmitt, M. and Bridgwater, A.V., Eds., Newbury: CPL, 1997, p. 197.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Garcia, L., Salvador, M.L., Arauzo, J., and Bilbao, R., Coprecipitated Ni–AL Catalyst in the Pyrolysis and Steam Gasification of Biomass, Biomass Gasification and Pyrolysis, Kaltschmitt, M. and Bridgwater, A.V., Eds., Newbury: CPL, 1997, p. 249.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Courson, C., Makaga, E., Petit, C., and Kiennaman, A., Development of Ni Catalysts for Gas Production from Biomass Gasification. Reactivity in Steam-and Dry-Reforming, Catal. Today, 2000, vol. 63, p. 427.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Deckwer, W.D. and Serperman, B., Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis in the Slurry Phase on Mn/Fe Catalysts, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 1982, vol. 21, p. 222.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dry, M.E., Practical and Theoretical Aspects of the Catalytic Fischer–Tropsch Process, Appl. Catal. A, 1996, vol. 138, p. 319.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Corella, J., Orio, A., and Aznar, P., Biomass Gasification with Air in Fluidized Bed: Reforming of the Gas Composition with Commercial Steam Reforming Catalysts, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1998, vol. 37, p. 4617.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bukur, D.B., Patel, S.A., and Lang, X., Fixed Bed and Slurry Reactor Studies of Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis on Precipitated Iron Catalyst, Appl. Catal., 1990, vol. 61, p. 329.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meshcheryakov, V.D., Kirillov, V.A. Analyzing Biomass Conversion into Liquid Hydrocarbons. Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering 36, 466–471 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020625812461

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020625812461

Keywords

Navigation