Skip to main content
Log in

Product development strategies for foods in the era of molecular biotechnology

  • Published:
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Breakthroughs in science and technology are accelerating development of new products that are impacting our regulatory systems. Genetically modified or bioengineering plant varieties have entered the food supply on a global basis, especially in the U.S. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulates on the premise of ‘substantial equivalence’ and has developed premarket notification procedures and voluntary labeling guidelines. Japan's Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare regulates biotechnology products and has imposed biotechnology labeling regulations. However, the EU continues to be in a regulatory gridlock between member states and has proposed strict traceability and labeling guidelines. These requirements are currently restricting imports of bioengineered foods and are creating an international debate. In contrast to bioengineered plant varieties, to our knowledge, there are no strains of lactic acid bacterial starter cultures on the market that contain rDNA. The majority of strains have been improved via selection and mutagenesis. However, conjugation and electroporation have been used to transfer native lactococcal phage resistance plasmids to industrial strains. In addition, plasmids have been introduced to allow for selection of certain characteristics and then been eliminated by curing. The potential benefits of bioengineered foods are far reaching and are one of the most important opportunities of this century. However, bioengineered foods remain an emotional debate that is affecting world trade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • 5_9_00.htm

  • Barboza D (2000) Modified foods put companies in a quandary. http://www.biotech-info.net/quandry.html

  • ma rket.html

  • Bolotin A, Mauger S, Malarme K, Dusko Ehrlich S& Sorokin A (1999) Low-redundancy sequencing of the entire Lactococcus lactis IL1403 genome. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 76: 27–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen CM (1997) The Innovators Dilemma. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • consumer/library/press/press63_en.pdf

  • Commission of the European Communities (2001) A proposal for a regulation of the European parliament and the council, concerning traceability and labeling of genetically modified organisms and traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC. Brussels, 25.7.2001, COM (2001) 182 final, 2001/0180 (COD). http://europa.eu.int

  • Curic M, Stuer-Lauridsen B, Renault P& Nilsson D (1999) A general method for selection of β-acetolactate decarboxylasedeficient Lactococcus lactis mutants to improve diacetyl formation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65: 1202–1206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickely F, Nilsson D, Hansen EB& Johansen E (1995) Isolation of Lactococcus lactis nonsense suppressors and construction of a food-grade cloning vector. Molec. Microbiol. 15: 839–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC. Official Journal L 106, 17/04/2001 pp 0001–0039.

  • Emond É, Lavall E, Drolet G, Moineau S& LaPointe G (2001) Molecular characterization of a theta replication plasmid and its use for development of a two-component food-grade cloning system for Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67: 1700–1709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurobarometer 52.1 (2000) The Europeans and Biotechnology. http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/pdf/euro barometer-en.pdf

  • FAO/WHO (2000) Safety aspects of genetically modified foods of plant origin. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO expert consultation of foods derived from Biotechnology. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA (1992a) Food Additives. FDA/IFIC Brochure. http://www.cfsan.fda.gov~lrd/foodaddi.html

  • FDA (1992b) Statement of policy: foods derived from new plant varieties; notice. Food and Drug Administration. Fed. Reg. 57: 22984–23005.

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA (1997a) Guidance on consultation procedures, foods derived from new plant varieties. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. http://www.cfsan.fda.gov October, 1997.

  • FDA (1997b) Substances generally recognized as safe. Food and Drug Administration Fed. Reg. 62: 18937–18964.

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA (2001a) Guidanace for Industry: voluntary labeling indicating whether foods have or have not been developed using bioengineering. Draft guidance. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. http://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/biolabgu.html

  • FDA (2001b) List of completed consultations on bioengineered foods. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Office of Food Additive Safety, July 2001. http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~lrd/biocon.html

  • FDA (2001c) Premarket notice concerning bioengineered foods. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Fed. Reg. 66: 4706–4738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guldfeldt LU, Sørensen KI, Strøman P, Behrndt H, Williams D& Johansen E (2001) Effect of starter cultures with a genetically modified peptidolytic or lytic system on Cheddar cheese ripening. Int. Dairy J. 11: 373–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFBC (1990) Biotechnologies and food: assuring the safety of food produced by genetic modification. International Food Biotechnology Council. Regulatory Toxicol Pharmacol. 12: Part 2.

  • IFIC (2001a) Agricultural biotechnology: myths&facts. International Food Information Council, Food Safety&Nutritional Information, IFIC Food Insight, October, 2001. http://ific.org

  • IFIC (2001b) Most Americans can articulate expected benefits of food biotechnology. International Food Information Council, Food Safety&Nutrition Information, IFIC Background, November, 2001. http://ific.org.

  • IFT (2000) IFT expert report on biotechnology and foods. Labeling of rDNA biotechnology-derived foods. Food Technol. 54: 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jan 2002.htm

  • Janzen T, Stuer-Lauridsen B, Rasmussen P, Schnabl J&Riisberg L (2002) Inactivation of the pip gene is the dominating mutation type for mutants from Lactocococus lactis resistant towards c2-like phages. Poster presentation at the Seventh Symposium on Lactic Acid Bacteria, the Netherlands.

  • Johansen E (1999) Genetic engineering (b) Modification of bacteria, In: Robinson R, Batt C& Patel P (Eds) Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology, Academic Press, London (pp 917–921).

    Google Scholar 

  • Joutsjoki V, Louoma S, Tamminen M, Kilpi M, Johansen E&Palva A (2002) Recombinant Lactococcus starters as a potential source of additional peptidolytic activity in cheese ripening. J. Appl. Microbiol. In press.

  • microbial/html/lactobacillus_gas_content.html

  • Larson A (2002) Larson on trade liberalization, biotechnology and growth. The United States Mission to the European Union, Brussels, Belgium, January 8, 2002. http://www.useu.be/Categories/Biotech/Jan0802BiotechTrade LarsonEUe.html

  • Levy AS& Derby BM (2000) Report on Consumer Focus Groups on Biotechnology, Consumer Studies Team, Center for Food Safety and Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCormick C, Griffin H& Gasson M (1995) Construction of a food-grade host/vector system for Lactococcus lactis based on the lactose operon. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 127: 105–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mierau I, Kunji E, Leenhouts K, Hellendoorn M, Haandrikman A, Poolman B, Konings W, Venema G& Kok J (1996) Multiplepeptidase mutants of Lactococcus lactis are severely impaired in their ability to grow in milk. J. Bacteriol. 178: 2794–2803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miraglia M, Onori R, Brera C& Cava E (1998) Safety assessment of genetically modified food products: An evaluation of developed approaches and methodologies. Microchem. J. 59: 154–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCBI (2002) Microbial genomes. Completed and ongoing projects. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMGifs/Genomes/bact.html

  • OECD (2000) Report of the task force for the safety of novel foods and feeds. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris. 86/ADDA, May 17

  • Rutgers News (2001) To the point: Rutgers' Food Policy Institute report shows that Americans confused and undecided about biotechnology. http://njaes.rutgers.edu/www/news/pressreleases/2001/1115-biotechnology.html

  • Sanders ME, Leonhard PJ, Sing WE& Klaenhammer TR (1986) Conjugal strategy for construction of fast acid-producing, bacteriophage-resistant lactic streptococci for use I dairy fermentations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 52: 1001–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen K, Larsen R, Kibenich A, Junge M& Johansen E (2000) A food-grade cloning system for industrial strains of Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 1253–1258.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA (2001) Japan Biotechnology. Update of Japan's Biotechnology Safety Approval and Labeling Policies 2001. Foreign Agricultural Service Global Agriculture Information Network Report. GAIN Report #JA1080, August 29, 2001.

  • von Wright A, Wessels S, Tynkkynen S& Saarela M (1990) Isolation of a replication region of a large lactococcal plasmid and use in cloning of a nisin resistance determinant. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56: 2029–2035.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey K. Kondo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kondo, J.K., Johansen, E. Product development strategies for foods in the era of molecular biotechnology. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 82, 291–302 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020612405794

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020612405794

Navigation