Skip to main content
Log in

Electric-Field Gradients at Group-III Sites on GaAs and InAs (111)B Surfaces

  • Published:
Hyperfine Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report a comparison of electric-field gradients (EFGs) measured at the group-III sites on epitaxially-grown surfaces of 2×2-reconstructed GaAs and InAs crystals. For this purpose, we used 111In→111Cd perturbed-angular-correlation (PAC) spectroscopy. Sharp spectral lines characterize the perturbation functions corresponding to both surfaces. On GaAs surface, we observe only one well-defined nuclear electric-quadrupole interaction (NQI); and on the InAs surface, we observe a primary and a secondary NQI. Very similar but experimentally-distinguishable values of the EFG-parameters characterize the primary interactions corresponding to the GaAs and InAs surfaces. Specifically, for the GaAs and InAs surfaces, ω Q =28.0±0.2 Mrad s−1 and η=0.43±0.02 and ω Q =28.8±0.2 Mrad s−1 and η=0.39±0.02, and the angles between EFG z-axis and the (111) direction are 65°±3° and β=53°±3°, respectively. These unexpected results indicate that the so-called lattice contribution to the EFG is not significant. Moreover, for the primary NQIs on both surfaces, the similar parameter values demonstrate that chemical differences between the 111In probe and the indigenous Ga surface atoms cause no large quantitative effects. This information indicates that impurity probes and PAC spectroscopy can be used effectively to investigate III–V surfaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. For a description of the PAC technique, see: Catchen, G. L., Mater. Research Soc. Bull. 20 (1995), 37.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adams, J. M., Catchen, G. L., Loubychev, D., Fu, J. and Miller, D. L., Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B 143 (1998), 591.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Adams, J. M., Catchen, G. L., Fu, J. and Miller, D. L., Surface Sci. 337 (1995), 118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Catchen, G. L., Adams, J. M., Fu, J. and Miller, D. L., Hyp. Interact. 97-98 (1996), 193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Adams, J. M., Ph.D. Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, 1995.

  6. Adams, J. M., Fu, J., Catchen, G. L. and Miller, D. L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 61 (1992), 2668.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lindgren, B., Hyp. Interact. C 1 (1996), 613.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Biegelsen, D. K., Bringans, R. D., Northrup, J. E. and Swarz, L.-E., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990), 452.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Setzer, C., Platen, J., Bludau, H., Gierer, M., Over, H. and Jakobi, K., Surface Sci. 402-404 (1998), 782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ren, H.-W., Tanaka, M. and Nishinaga, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69 (1996), 565.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Avery, A. R., Tok, E. S. and Jones, T. S., Surface Sci. 376 (1997), L397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thornton, J. M. C., Woolf, D. A. and Weightman, P., Appl. Surface Sci. 123-124 (1998), 115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. For a thorough discussion of probe chemistry, see: Wichert, Th., Achtziger, N., Metzner, H. and Sielemann, R., Perturbed angular correlation, In: G. Langouche (ed.) Hyperfine Interaction of Defects in Semiconductors, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Catchen, G.L., Loubychev, D. & Platzer, R. Electric-Field Gradients at Group-III Sites on GaAs and InAs (111)B Surfaces. Hyperfine Interactions 136, 633–639 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020586808228

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020586808228

Keywords

Navigation