Skip to main content
Log in

Improvement in the Oxidation Resistance of an Al-Deposited Fe–Cr–Al Foil by Preoxidation

  • Published:
Oxidation of Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The oxidation kinetics of conventional Fe–20Cr–5Al (in mass %) foil, Al-deposited foil and Al-deposited and preoxidized foil was studied at 1373 K in air. All the foils were 50-μm thick and contained minor additions of rare-earth elements. The oxide scales were observed with SEM and TEM combined with EDS and were characterized with X-ray diffractometry and electron diffraction. The deposition of Al onto the foil from the vapor phase improves oxidation resistance. The details regarding this matter were reported elsewhere. The combination of the Al deposition and the subsequent preoxidation at 1173 K for 90 ks in air further increases the oxidation resistance, i.e., the smallest parabolic rate constant among the three kinds of foils, and excellent scale adherence. Preoxidation enhances the growth of θ-Al2O3, which transforms to α-Al2O3 during subsequent oxidation. However, such α-Al2O3 grains are much larger than those formed on the conventional foil of similar chemical composition. Small closed voids and small spinel-type, oxide particles appear in α-Al2O3 grains with the progress of oxidation. The former is explained in terms of the volume decrease accompanying the phase transformation and the latter by the low solubility of Fe in α-Al2O3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. M. Nonnenmann, SAE Tech. Paper Ser. 850131 (1985).

  2. P. N. Hawker, C. Jaffray, and A. J. J. Wilkins, SAE Tech. Paper Ser. 880317 (1988).

  3. T. Takeda and T. Tanaka, SAE Tech. Paper Ser. 910615 (1991).

  4. S. Isobe, Denki-Seikoh 58, 104 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. Hiramatsu, K. Miyakusu, and Y. Uematsu, Nisshin Steel Technical Rep., No. 63, p. 145 (1989).

  6. K. Ishii and T. Kawasaki, J. Jpn Inst. Met. 56, 845 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. Ishii and S. Taniguchi, Oxid. Met. 54, 491 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Andoh, S. Taniguchi, and T. Shibata, Oxid. Met. 46, 481 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Andoh, S. Taniguchi, and T. Shibata, Tetsu-to-Hagane 83, 205 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Prescott and M. J. Graham, Oxid. Met. 38, 233 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. A. Pint, Oxid. Met. 45, 1 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Andoh, S. Taniguchi, and T. Shibata, Mater. Sci. Forum 251–254, 785 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Andoh, S. Taniguchi, and T. Shibata, Tetsu-to-Hagane 84, 285 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Wernick, R. Pinner, and P. G. Sheasby, The Surface Treatment and Finishing of Aluminium and Its Alloys (Finishing Publication Ltd., 1987), p. 5.

  15. M. W. Brumm and H. J. Grabke, Corros. Sci. 33, 1677 (1992).

  16. W. C. Hagel, Corrosion 21, 316 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. C. Rybicki and J. L. Smialek, Oxid. Met. 31, 275 (1989).

  18. J. Doychak, C. A. Barrett, and J. L. Smialek, TMS Proceedings on Corrosion and Particle Erosion at High-temperatures, V. Srinivasan and K. Vedula, eds. (1989), p. 487.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taniguchi, S., Andoh, A. Improvement in the Oxidation Resistance of an Al-Deposited Fe–Cr–Al Foil by Preoxidation. Oxidation of Metals 58, 545–562 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020577107126

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020577107126

Navigation