Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modelling cognitive style in a peer help networkt

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I-Help is a computer system that assists learners as they try to solve problems while learning a subject. I-Help achieves this by supporting a network of peersthat help each other out. One component ofI-Help selects appropriate peers to assist astudent, and then sets up a one-on-one peerhelp session between the helper and the helpee.The matching of helper to helpee takes intoaccount factors such as a potential helper'sknowledge of the topic of the helpee'squestion; their availability and eagerness tohelp; and their general helpfulness. Recentwork has developed a cognitive style componentto supplement these attributes, which enablesconsideration also of the suitability of ahelper's cognitive style for answering thehelpee's question. This paper describes howmodelling individuals' cognitive style canusefully supplement other user model data in apeer help network, and describes how thisinformation is obtained in I-Help.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldwin, B.A. & Reckers, P.M.J. (1984). Exploring the role of learning style research in accounting education policy. Journal of Accounting Education2(2): 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, T., Jones, S., Britton, C. & Messer, D. (2000). Individual cognitive style and performance in a multimedia learning application. Presented at EURO Education 2000 Conference. Aalborg, Denmark.

  • Brown, H.D. & Burke, R.C. (1987). Accounting education: A learning styles study of professional-technical and future adaptation issues. Journal of Accounting Education5: 187–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, S. (1997). A multiple student and user modelling system for peer interaction. In R. Schäfer & M. Bauer, eds, 5 GI-Workshop, Adaptivität und Benutzermodellierung in interaktiven Softwaresystemen, pp. 61–71. Universität des Saarlandes. Online proceedings: http://w5.cs.uni-sb.de/abis97/proceedings/bull.ps

  • Bull, S. & Greer, J. (2000). Peer help for problem-based learning. In S.S. Young, J. Greer, H. Maurer & Y.S. Chee, eds, Proceedings of ICCE/ICAI 2000: Learning Societies in the New Millenium, Creativity, Caring and Commitments (Volume 2), pp. 1007–1015. National Tsing Hua University of Taiwan.

  • Bull, S., Greer, J., McCalla, G. & Kettel, L. (2001a). Help-seeking in an asynchronous help forum. In R. Luckin & B. du Boulay, eds, Proceedings of Workshop on Help Provision and Help Seeking in Interactive Learning Environments, pp. 9–21. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Online proceedings: http://www.cogs.susx.ac.uk/ users/bend/aied2001/bull.pdf

  • Bull, S., Greer, J., McCalla, G., Kettel, L. & Bowes, J. (2001b). User modelling in I-Help: What, why, when and how. In M. Bauer, P.J. Gmytrasiewicz & J. Vassileva, eds, User Modeling 2001, pp. 117–126. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Also available from: http://www.eee.bham.ac.uk/bull/papers/UM01.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapp, R.G. (1993). Stability of cognitive style in adults and some implications, a longitudinal study of the Kirton adaption-innovation inventory. Psychological Reports73: 1235–1245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J. (1993). Cognitive style and computer-assisted learning: Problems and a possible solution. Association for Learning Technology Journal1(1): 47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. (1999). Representation, construction, externalised cognition and individual differences. Learning and Instruction9: 343–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Kleer, J. (1986). An assumption-based truth maintenance system. Artificial Intelligence Journal28(2): 127–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. (1979). A truth maintenance system. Artificial Intelligence Journal12: 231–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, P.J., Cule, N., Gough, M. Heer, K., Monson, J.R.T., Lee, P.W.R., Kerin, M.J. & Duthie, G.S. (1998). Optimal education techniques for basic surgical trainees: Lessons from education theory. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh44: 55–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felder, R. (not dated). Index of Learning Styles (ILS). http://www2.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/ users/f/felder/public/ILSpage.html. Accessed: 27th March 2001.

  • Ford, N. (1985). Learning styles and strategies of postgraduate students. British Journal of Educational Technology16(1): 65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, J. & Bull, S. (2000). Computer support for collaboration in medical education. Clinical and Investigative Medicine23(4): 270–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, J., McCalla, G., Cooke, J., Collins, J., Kumar, V., Bishop, A. & Vassileva, J. (1998). The intelligent helpdesk: Supporting peer help in a university course. In B.P. Goettl, H.M. Halff, C.L. Redfield, V.J. Shute, eds, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 494–503. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, J., McCalla, G., Vassileva, J., Deters, R., Bull, S. & Kettel, L. (2001). Lessons learned in deploying a multi-agent learning support system: The I-Help experience. In J.D. Moore, C.L. Redfield & W.L. Johnson, eds, Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 410–421. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groat, A. & Musson, T. (1995). Learning styles: Individualizing computer-based learning environments. Association for Learning Technology Journal3(2): 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, H.U. (1995). The use of multiple student modelling to parameterize group learning. In J. Greer, ed, Proceedings of World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 234–241. Charlottesville, VA: AACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz, E. (1997). Agents with beliefs: Reflections on Bayesian methods for user modeling. In A. Jameson, C. Paris & C. Tasso, eds, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on User Modeling, pp. 441–443. Wien, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X. (1993). Inconsistent beliefs, attention, and student modelling. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education3(4): 417–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X., McCalla, G.I., Greer, J.E. & Neufeld, E. (1991). Revising deductive knowledge and stereotypical knowledge in a student model. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction1(1): 87–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J. (1995). The UM Toolkit for cooperative user modelling. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction4: 149–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwok, M. & Jones, C. (1995). Catering for Different learning styles. Association for Learning Technology Journal3(1): 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D. (1979). The processes of student learning. Higher Education8: 395–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonka, K. & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (1996). Epistemologies, conceptions of learning, and study practices in medicine and psychology. Higher Education31: 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCalla, G., Vassileva, J., Greer, J. & Bull, S. (2000). Active learner modelling. In G. Gauthier, C. Frasson & K. VanLehn, eds, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 53–62. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, E. (1999a). An investigation of text-based instructional materials enhanced with graphics. Educational Psychology19(3): 323–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, E. (1999b). Exploring the effect of graphical metaphors on the performance of learning computer programming concepts in adult learners: A pilot study. Educational Psychology19(4): 471–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, E. (2000). Measurement of cognitive performance in computer programming concept acquisition: Interactive effects of visual metaphors and the cognitive style construct. Journal of Applied Measurement1(3): 257–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, S., Cook, J., Shiu, E. & McFadyen, A. (1997). Adapting to learner attributes: Experiments ising an adaptive tutoring System. Educational Psychology17(1-2): 141–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, A. (1991). What can learning styles research learn from cognitive psychology? Educational Psychology11(3-4): 239–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mühlenbrock, M., Tewissen, F. & Hoppe, H.U. (1998). A framework system for intelligent support in open distributed learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education9(3-4): 256–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newble, D.I. & Hejka, E.J. (1991). Approaches to learning of medical students and practising physicians: Some empirical evidence and its Implications for medical education. Educational Psychology11(3-4): 333–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogata, H., Sueda, T., Furugori, N. & Yano, Y. (1999). Augmenting collaboration beyond classrooms through online social networks. In G. Cumming, T. Okamoto & L. Gomez, eds, Advanced Research in Computers and Communications in Education - Proceedings of ICCE' 99, pp. 277–284. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pask, G. (1976). Styles and strategies of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology46: 128–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillay, H. (1998). An investigation of the effect of individual cognitive preferences on learning through computer-based instruction. Educational Psychology18(2): 171–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (1979). Student learning and perceptions of the academic environment. Higher Education8: 411–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. & Entwistle, N.J. (1981). Effects of academic departments on students' approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology51: 368–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, E. (1983). Users are individuals: Individualizing user models. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies (18): 199–214.

  • Rich, E. (1989). Stereotypes and user modeling. In A. Kobsa & W. Wahlster, eds, User Models in Dialog Systems, pp. 35–51. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riding, R. (1991). Cognitive Styles Analysis. Birmingham: Learning and Training Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riding, R. (1998). Cognitive Styles Analysis. Birmingham: Learning and Training Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riding, R.J. & Ashmore, J. (1980). Verbaliser-imager learning style and children's recall of information presented in pictorial versus written form. Educational Studies6(2): 141–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riding, R.J., Buckle, C.F., Thompson, S. & Hagger, E. (1989). The computer determination of learning styles as an aid to individualized computer-based training. Educational and Training Technology International26(4): 393–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riding, R. & Caine, T. (1993). Cognitive style and GCSE performance in mathematics, English language and French. Educational Psychology13(1): 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riding, R.J. & Calvey, I. (1981). The assessment of verbal-imagery learning styles and their effect on the recall of concrete and abstract prose passages by 11 year old children. British Journal of Psychology72: 59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riding, R. & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive style - an overview and integration. Educational Psychology11(3-4): 193–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riding, R. & Douglas, G. (1993). The effect of cognitive style and mode of presentation on learning performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology63: 297–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riding, R.J., Glass, A., Butler, S.R. & Pleydell-Pearce, C.W. (1997). Cognitive style and individual differences in EEG alpha during information processing. Educational Psychology17(1-2): 219–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riding, R. & Rayner, S. (1998). Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies. London: David Fulton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riding, R. & Sadler-Smith, E. (1992). Type of instructional material, cognitive style and learning performance. Educational Studies18(3): 323–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riding, R.J. & Watts, M. (1997). The effect of cognitive style on the preferred format of instructional material. Educational Psychology17(1-2): 179–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler-Smith, E. & Riding, R. (1999). Cognitive style and instructional preferences. Instructional Science27: 355–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soloman, B.A. & Felder, R.M. (1999). Index of Learning Styles Questionnaire. http://www2. ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/ILSdir/ilsweb.html

  • Valley, K. (1997). Learning styles and courseware design. Association for Learning Technology Journal5(2): 42–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanLehn, K., Niu, Z., Siler, S. & Gertner, A.S. (1998). Student modeling from conventional test data: A Bayesian approach without priors. In B.P. Goettl, H.M. Halff, C.L. Redfield and V.J. Shute, eds, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 434–443. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vassileva, J., Greer, J., McCalla, G., Deters, R., Zapata, D., Mudgal, C. & Grant, S. (1999). A multi-agent design of a peer-help environment. In S. Lajoie & M. Vivet, eds, Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 38–45. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivacqua, A.S. (1999). Agents for expertise location. Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Intelligent Agents in Cyberspace, Stanford, CA.

  • Westman, A.S. (1993). Learning styles are content specific and probably influenced by content areas studied. Psychological Reports73: 512–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, M. & McCalla, G. (1999). The emergence of student models from and analysis of ethical decision making in a scenario-based learning environment. In J. Kay, ed, UM99 User Modeling, pp. 265–274. Wien, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, H.A., Moore, C.A., Goodenough, D.R. & Cox, P.W. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their implications. Review of Educational Research47: 1–64.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Educational Technology Research Group, Electronic, Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom

    Susan Bull

  2. ARIES Laboratory, Department of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5A9, Canada

    Gord McCalla

Authors
  1. Susan Bull
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gord McCalla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bull, S., McCalla, G. Modelling cognitive style in a peer help networkt. Instructional Science 30, 497–528 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020570928993

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020570928993

Search

Navigation