Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does the Pi strip method allow assessment of the available soil P?: Comparison against the reference isotope method

  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Experiments have been carried out in acid soils developed under tropical climates with and without phosphate rock (PR) addition to assess the ability of the Pi strip method to extract available soil P compared with the Isotopic Exchange Kinetics method (IEK). In the Pi strip method strips of filter paper, previously impregnated with iron hydroxide acting as a sink for phosphate ions from soil components, are added to an aqueous soil suspension. The extracted phosphate ions are eluted in diluted sulfuric acid and quantified by a colorimetric method. Available soil P, defined as the amount of phosphate ions that can move from the soil particles to soil solution, is described by three factors: an intensity factor, a quantity factor and a capacity factor. These three factors were determined by the IEK-method. Following the addition of carrier-free 32PO4-ions to soil, the ability of the Pi strip to extract available soil P was assessed: (i) by comparing the quantity of instantaneously exchangeable P (E1) to the quantity extracted with the Pi strip; (ii) by determining the fraction of 32P extracted with the Pi strip, and (iii) by comparing the specific activity (SA) of P present as phosphate ions extracted by the Pi strip to the specific activity of P in the soil solution. It was observed that (i) E1 and the amount extracted with the Pi strip are highly correlated, (ii) the recovery of 32P extracted by the Pi strip varies between 17 and 66%, and (iii) the specific activity of P extracted by the Pi strip is of the same order of magnitude as that of P in the soil solution. In acid soils low in available P, part of the P in aqueous KCl-extracts is presumably not only present as free phosphate ions but also occluded in the form of a soluble complex, whose isotopic exchangeability is significantly lower than that of phosphate ions transferred to the Pi strip. It is concluded from the results that the Pi strip method can be recommended in routine analysis for the determination of the quantity factor. However, this method cannot provide intensity or capacity factors and therefore needs to be complemented by the IEK-method for full characterization of the available soil P status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkins GL (1969) Multicompartmental models for biological systems. Bruxelles: Methuen & Co

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber SA (1995) Soil nutrient bioavailability. A mechanistic approach. New York: John Wiley and Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow NJ (1987) Reactions with variable-charge soils. Fert Res 14:1:199

    Google Scholar 

  • Buscarlet LA (1964) Les résines échangeuses d'ions en Agrologie. Bulletin d'Informations Scientifiques et Techniques 85: 45–47

  • Chardon WJ, Menon RG & Chien SH (1996) Iron oxide impregnated filter paper (Pi test): A review of its development and methodological research. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 46: 41–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Daubeny D (1845) On the distinction between the dormant and the active ingredients of the soils. J R Agric Soc Engl 7: 237–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado A & Torrent J (1997) Phosphate-rich soils in the European Union: estimating total plant-available phosphorus. Eur J Agron 6: 205–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Fardeau JC (1996) Dynamics of phosphate in soils. An isotopic outlook. Fert Res 45: 91–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Fardeau JC, Morel C & Boniface R (1988) Pourquoi choisir la méthode Olsen pour estimer le phosphore assimilable des sols. Agronomie 8: 577–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Fardeau JC, Guiraud G & Marol C (1995) Bioavailable soil P as a key to sustainable agriculture. Functional model determined by isotopic tracers. In: IAEA (ed) Nuclear techniques in soil-plant studies for sustainable agriculture and environmental preservation, pp 131–144. IAEA-SM-344/3. Vienna: IAEA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fardeau JC, Guiraud G & Marol C (1996) The role of isotopic techniques on the evaluation of the effectiveness of P fertilizers. Fert Res 45: 101–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried M & Dean LA (1952) A concept concerning the measurement of available soil nutrients. Soil Science 73: 263–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Frossard E, Fardeau JC, Brossard M & Morel JL (1994) Soil isotopically exchangeable phosphorus. A comparison between E and L values. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58: 846–851

    Google Scholar 

  • Habib L, Chien SH, Menon RG & Carmona G (1998) Modified iron-oxide-impreganted paper strip test for soils treated with phosphate fertilizers. Soil Sci Soc Am J 62: 972–976

    Google Scholar 

  • Indiati I (1997) Comparing tests for soil fertility. III. Evaluation of P availability in alfisols by Olsen, Mehlich 3, electro-ultrafiltration and the Pi paper strip methodology procedures. Comm Soil Sci Plant Analysis 28: 997–1009

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen S (1952) The use of P32 in studies in the uptake of phosphorus by plants. Plant Soil 4: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin T-Z, Ho S-B & Houng K-H (1991) The use of iron oxide-impregnated filter paper for the extraction of available phosphorus from Taiwan soils. Plant Soil 133: 219–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon RG & Fox RL (1983) Utility of phosphate sorption curves in estimating the phosphorus requirements of cereal crops: wheat (Triticum aestivum). In: Imphos (ed) Proc. 3rs Intern. Cong. on Phosphate Compounds. Bruxelles, pp 217–230. Casablanca: Imphos

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon RG, Chien SH & Hammond LL (1989a) The Pi soil phosphorus test. A new approach to testing for soil phosphorus. In: IFDC (ed). IFDC Ref. Manual R-7. Int Fert Dev Center, Muscle Shoals, Alabama

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon RG, Chien SH & Hammond LL (1989b) Comparison of Bray 1 and Pi tests for evaluating plant available phosphorus from soils treated with different partially acidulated phosphate rocks. Plant Soil 114: 211–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon RG, Chien SH, Hammond LL & Henao J (1989c) Modified techniques for preparing paper strips for the new Pi soil test for phosphorus. Fert Res 19: 85–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon RG, Hammond LL & Sissingh HA (1989d) Determination of plant available phosphorus by iron hydroxide-impregnated filter paper (Pi) soil test. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52: 110–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon RG, Chien SH & Gadalla AN (1991) Comparison of Olsen and Pi soil tests for evaluating phosphorus bioavailability in a calcareous soil treated with single superphosphate and partially acidulated phosphate rocks. Fert Res 29: 153–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon RG, Chien SH & Chardon WJ (1997) Iron oxide-impregnated filter paper (Pi test). A review of its application. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 47: 7–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel C & Fardeau JC (1991) Phosphorus bioavailability of fertilizers: a predictive laboratory method for its evaluation. Fert Res 28: 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel C & Plenchette C (1994) Is the isotopically exchangeable P the plant available P in a loamy soil. Plant Soil 158: 287–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel C, Tiessen H, Moir JO & Steward JWB (1994) Phosphorus transformations and availability under cropping and fertilization assessed by isotopic exchange. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58: 1439–1445

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel C, Blaskiewitz J & Fardeau JC (1995) Phosphorus supply to plants by soils with variable phosphorus exchange. Soil Science 160: 423–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy J & Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27: 31–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye PH & Tinker PB (1977) Solute movement in the soil-root system. University of California Press

  • Poss R (1991) Transferts de l'eau et des éléments minéraux dans les terres de Barres du Togo. Conséquences agronomiques. Thesis. University Paris VI. 336 p.

  • Poss R, Fardeau JC & Saragoni H (1995) Sustainable agriculture in the tropics: the case of potassium under maize cropping in Togo. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 46: 205–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Salcedo IH, Bertino F & Sampaio EVSB (1991) Reactivity of phosphorus in northeastern Brazilain soils assessed by isotopic dilution. Soil Sci Soc Am J 55: 140–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoffield RK (1955) Can a precise meaning be given to ‘available’ soil phosphorus? Soils Fertil 18: 373–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley AN (1991) Soil phosphorus extracted by iron-aluminium-oxide-impregnated filter paper. Soil Sci Soc Am J 55: 1038–1041

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley AN (1993) An innovative approach to estimate bioavailable phosphorus in agricultural run-off using iron oxide impregnated filter paper (Pi) soil test. J Environ Qual 22: 597–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley AN (1996) Availability of residual phosphorus in manured soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60: 1459–1466

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipley A & Clark RE (1972) Tracer methods for in vivo kinetics. Theory and application. New York: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinaj S, Mächler F, Frossard E, Faisse C, Oberson A & Morel C (1998) Interferences of colloidal particles in the determination of orthophosphate concentration in soil water extracts. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal 29: 1091–1105

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Veldhoven PP & Mannaerts GP (1987) Inorganic and organic phosphate measurements in the nanomolar range. Anal Biochem 161: 45–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Zee SEATM, Fokkink LGJ & Van Riemsdijk WH (1987) A new technique for assessment of reversibility adsorbed phosphate. Soil Sci Soc Am J 51: 599–604

    Google Scholar 

  • White RE & Beckett PHT (1964) Studies on phosphate potentials of soils. Part I. the measurement of phosphate potential. Plant Soil 20: 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapata F, Casanova E, Salas AM & Pino I (1994) Dynamics of phosphorus in soils and phosphate fertilizer management in different cropping systems through the use of isotopic techniques. In: Transact. 15th World Congress Soil Sci, Vol 5a: 452–466, Acapulco, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Soil Science Unit, FAO/IAEA Agriculture and Biotechnology Laboratory, International Atomic Energy Agency, A-2444, Seibersdorf, Austria

    Martina Aigner

  2. INRA, Science du sol, Route de Saint-Cyr, F-78000, Versailles, France

    Jean-Claude Fardeau

  3. Soil and Water Management & Crop Nutrition Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Division, International Atomic Energy Agency, A-1400, Vienna, Austria

    Felipe Zapata

Authors
  1. Martina Aigner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jean-Claude Fardeau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Felipe Zapata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martina Aigner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aigner, M., Fardeau, JC. & Zapata, F. Does the Pi strip method allow assessment of the available soil P?: Comparison against the reference isotope method. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 63, 49–58 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020530617559

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020530617559

Search

Navigation