Abstract
In general, health plan report cards can provide valuable information to consumers, physicians, and health care purchasers regarding plan performance and quality to assist in the selection of a health plan. However, significant limitations of health plan report cards currently exist. It is only with further evolvement and refinement that health plan report cards can live up to their potential and become a distinctive and useful tool in evaluating and selecting among various health plans.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
President Clinton's Health Care Reform Proposal and Health Security Act, as presented to Congress on October 27, 1993.
Skolnick, A. JCAHO, NCQA, and AMAP Establish Council to Coordinate Health Care Performance Measurement. JAMA 279:1769–1770, 1998.
Colorado House Bill 97-1311, Concerning Comprehensive Health Benefit Plan Description Forms. Approved June, 3, 1997, Effective June 3, 1997.
Dallek, G., Information Poor in the Information Age, The Medicare Rights Center, January 1999.
Dallek, G., Information Poor in the Information Age, The Medicare Rights Center, January 1999.
Marwick, C. NCQA: Quality Through Evaluation. JAMA 278:1555–1556, 1997.
Dallek, G., Information Poor in the Information Age, The Medicare Rights Center, January 1999.
Dallek, G., Information Poor in the Information Age, The Medicare Rights Center, January 1999.
Marwick, C. NCQA: Quality Through Evaluation. JAMA 278:1555–1556, 1997.
O'Connor, G.T., Plume, S.K., Olmstead, E.M., et al., A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA 275:841–846, 1996.
Id.
Dalzell, M., Health Care Report Cards: Who's Paying Attention? Managed Care Magazine, February 1999.
Dalzell, M., Health Care Report Cards: Who's Paying Attention? Managed Care Magazine, February 1999.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kroll Letwat, J. The Current Quality of Health Plan Report Cards. Journal of Medical Systems 23, 325–333 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020530428375
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020530428375