Software Quality Journal

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 169–180 | Cite as

Empirical Measurement of the Effects of Cultural Diversity on Software Quality Management

  • Kerstin V. Siakas
  • Elli Georgiadou


The difficulties of achieving social acceptance for Software Quality Management systems have been underestimated in the past, and they will be exacerbated in the future by the globalization of the software market and the increasing use of cross-cultural development teams within multinational companies. Management that can take account of the cultural context of their endeavours will improve understanding, minimize risk and ensure a higher degree of success in improvement programs within the software industry.

This paper addresses cross-cultural issues in Software Quality Management. Qualitative and quantitative research was carried out in five European countries by using a postal questionnaire. Empirical measures of organizational culture, national culture and their interdependence, are presented together with interim instruments developed for the purpose of classifying organizations. Verification of the statistical results from the survey was carried out by triangulation, which included qualitative research methods in the form of interviews and observation. Cultural factors, which may have bearing on successful adoption and implementation of Software Quality Management were identified, and an assessment model, has been developed for use by organizations developing software in different parts of the world. The intention is that the recommendations following from the assessment will lead to greater cultural awareness in addressing quality, and will provide stimulus for improvement. The model's aims is to predict to what degree there is a fit between the organizational and the national culture, and to give recommendations and guidelines for software process improvement.

software quality management cultural diversity software process improvement empirical measurement 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adler, N.J. 1997. International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior, Ohio, South Western College Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Curtis, B., Heflleey, W.E., and Miller, S. 1995. Overview of the People Capability Maturity Model, CMU/SEI_95-MM-01.Google Scholar
  3. Haase, V.H. 1992. Bootstrap—measuring software management capabilities, First findings in Europe, Fourth IAFC/IFIP Workshop, Wien, Austria.Google Scholar
  4. Haase, V.H.and Messnarz, R.1994. Bootstrap, fine-tuning process assessment, IEEE Software. July pp. 25–35.Google Scholar
  5. Hirschheim, R.A. Information Systems Epistemology: An Historical Perspective In Information Systems Research, Issues, Methods and Practical Guidelines, Galliers (Ed.), Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Hoecklin, L. 1995. Managing Cultural Differences, Strategies for Competitive Advantage, New York, U.S.A., Addison-Wesley Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  7. Hofstede, G. 1983. The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories, J. Int. Business Studies, Fall, pp. 75–92.Google Scholar
  8. Hofstede, G. 1984. Culture 's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, London, Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Hofstede, G. 1985. The interaction between national and organizational value system, J. of Management Studies. 22: 347–357.Google Scholar
  10. Hofstede, G. 1994. Cultures and Organizations, Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival, Software of the Mind, Berkshire, U.K., McGraw-Hill International.Google Scholar
  11. Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D., and Sanders, G. 1990. Measuring organizational cultures, A qualitative study across twenty cases, Administrative Science Quarterly. 35: 286–316.Google Scholar
  12. Humphrey, W. 1959. Managing the Software Process, New York, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  13. Humphrey, W. 1995. A Discipline for Software Engineering, New York, U.S.A., Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  14. Järvinen, J. 1994. On comparing process assessment results: BOOTSTRAP, and CMM software quality management, SQM '94, Edinburgh, U.K. pp. 274–61–94.Google Scholar
  15. Joynt, P. and Warner, M. 1996. Introduction: Cross-Cultural Perspectives in Managing Across Cultures: Issues and Perspectives, London,U.K., International Thomson Business Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kitchenham, B. 1996. Software Metrics—Measurement for Process Improvement, NCC, Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Kondo, Y. 1995. Importance of employee motivation in TQM, Fifth World Congress on Total Quality, Feb., New Delhi, India, pp. 46–52.Google Scholar
  18. Kuvaja, P. 1999. New developments in software process improvement, keynote speech, Software Quality Conf., Southampton, U.K.Google Scholar
  19. Mohamed Walaa-Eldeen, A. and Siakas, K.V. 1995. Assessing software quality management maturity (SQMM): A new model incorporating technical aswell ascultural factors, Third Int.Conf.on Software Quality Management SQM '95, Seville.Google Scholar
  20. Oppenheim, A.N. 1996. Questionnaire Design,Interviewing and Attitude Measurement, Printer Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  21. Orlikowski, W.J. and Baroudi, J.J. 1991. Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions, Information Systems Res. 2(1): 1–28.Google Scholar
  22. Oyen, E. 1992. Comparative Methodology,Theory and Practice in International Social Research, London, Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  23. Paulk, M.C. Comparing ISO 9001 and Capability maturity model for Software, Software Quality J. 2: 245–256.Google Scholar
  24. Paulk, M.C., Curtis, B., and Chrissis, M.B. 1993. Capability maturity model, version 1.1, IEEE Software, pp. 19–27.Google Scholar
  25. Pfleeger, L.F. 1998. Software Engineering,Theory and Practice, New Jersey, U.S.A., Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  26. Rickard, J. 1997. Personal issues in software cost estimation, Fifth Software Quality Conf., Scotland, Dundee.Google Scholar
  27. Sanders, M. 1998. The SPIRE Handbook, Better, Faster, Cheaper Software, Development in Small Organisations, SPIRE Project, The European Community, ESPIT/ESSI 23873.Google Scholar
  28. Schein, E. 1983. The role of the founder in creating organizational culture, Organizational Dynamics. 12(1): 13–28.Google Scholar
  29. Siakas, K.V. 1996. The effect of cultural factors in the implementation of software quality management systems, Fifth Software Quality Conf., Scotland,Dundee.Google Scholar
  30. Siakas, K.V. 2001. CODES: cultural and organizational dimensions for management, University of North London, A Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.Google Scholar
  31. Siakas, K.V. and Balstrup, B. 2000. A field-study of cultural influences on software process improvement in a global organization, European Software Process Improvement Conf., Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  32. Siakas, K.V. and Georgiadou, E. 2000. A new topology of national and organizational cultures to facilitate software quality management, The Fifth Int. Conf. on Software Process Improvement—Research into Education and Training, London, U.K.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kerstin V. Siakas
    • 1
  • Elli Georgiadou
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of InformaticsTechnological Educational Institution of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Middlesex UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations