Abstract
The reaction and poisoning mechanism of SO2 with La0.9Sr0.1CoO3 model catalysts have been investigated. The structure and the chemical states of the model catalysts have been studied by using AES, XPS and XRD techniques. The results indicated that SO2 diffused into the La0.9Sr0.1CoO3 film during poisoning. La2(SO4)3 species was formed on the surface of the film and La2(SO4)3, La2(SO3)3, La2O2SO4 and CoO species were found in the interior. The perovskite structure of La0.9Sr0.1CoO3 was destroyed by invasion of SO2. The concentration of sulfur in the film layer was related to the reaction temperature and time. After the sample was poisoned for a fairly long time, the distribution of sulfur in the La0.9Sr0.1CoO3 layer became homogeneous, suggesting that a dynamic equilibrium was achieved between the poisoning reaction and the decomposition of the sulfates. XRD and catalytic activity test results proved that the destruction of perovskite structure and the formation of sulfates were the main causes of deactivation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D.B. Meadowcroft, Nature 226 (1970) 847.
J.B. Goodenough, R. Manoharan and M. Paranthaman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112 (1990) 1076.
P. Ciambelli et al. Appl. Catal. B 24 (2000) 243.
I. Rosso et al. Appl. Catal. B 34 (2001) 29.
Y. Zhu et al. Appl. Catal. A: General 209 (2000) 71.
R.N. Singh and B. Lal, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 27 (2002) 45.
Y. Zhu, T. Yi, S. Gao and C. Yan, J. Mater. Sci. 34 (1999) 4969.
Y. Zhu et al. J. Mater. Sci, 35 (2000) 5415.
J.F Moulder et al. Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (Perkin-Elmer, Eden Prairie, MN, 1992).
Y. Zhu and L. Cao, Appl. Surf. Sci. 133 (1998) 213.
N.S. Mclntyre and M.G. Cook, Anal. Chem. 47 (1975) 2208.
L. Simonot, F. Garin and G. Maire, Appl. Catal. B 11 (1997) 167.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, H., Zhu, Y., Tan, R. et al. Study on the Poisoning Mechanism of Sulfur Dioxide for Perovskite La0.9Sr0.1CoO3 Model Catalysts. Catalysis Letters 82, 199–204 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020519012365
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020519012365