Skip to main content
Log in

A General Method for Constrained Analysis of Fluorescence Anisotropy Decay: Application of the Steady-State Anisotropy

  • Published:
Journal of Fluorescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy is an invaluable method for investigating the internal and rotational dynamics of biomolecules. The range of rotational motions detectable by anisotropy decay is limited by the fluorescence lifetime; typically, a depolarizing motion may be resolved if the associated correlation time is between 0.1 and 10 times the intensity decay lifetime. To extend that range and to improve the recovery of anisotropy decay parameters, a general analytical method has been developed. This procedure utilizes a modification of Lagrange multiplier methods to constrain the values of the iterated kinetic parameters during nonlinear least-squares analysis of anisotropy decay data. The form of the constraint equation is derived from the classic relationship between the decay parameters and the steady-state anisotropy, which can be simply and accurately measured. Application of the constraint to analyses of synthetic data sets increased the accuracy of recovery by decreasing the uncertainty in the iterated parameters. The constraint also enabled the accurate recovery of correlation times that were a factor of 30 greater than the fluorescence lifetime, although it did not improve recovery of correlation times that were much shorter than the lifetime. Using this technique, it should now be possible to characterize the dynamics of larger macromolecules and assemblies than those that can currently be studied by fluorescence anisotropy decay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. M. Badea and L. Brand (1979) Methods Enzymol. 61, 378–425.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ph. Wahl (1979) Biophys. Chem. 10, 91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. L. Johnson and L. M. Faunt (1992) Methods Enzymol. 210, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Waxman, W. R. Laws, T. M. Laue, Y. Nemerson, and J. B. A. Ross (1993) Biochemistry 32, 3005–3012.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. L. Rachofsky, J. B. A. Ross, M. Krauss, and R. Osman (1998) Acta Phys. Pol. A 94, 735–748.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. M. Beechem, J. R. Knutson, J. B. A. Ross, B. W. Turner, and L. Brand (1983) Biochemistry 22, 6054–6058.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. R. Knutson, J. M. Beechem, and L. Brand (1983) Chem. Phys. Lett. 102, 501–507.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. E. Dale (1983) in R. B. Cundall and R. E. Dale (Eds.), Time-Resolved Fluorescence Spectroscopy in Biochemistry and Biology, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. H. Easter, R. P. DeToma, and L. Brand (1976) Biophys. J. 16, 571–583.

    Google Scholar 

  10. I. Isenberg and R. D. Dyson (1969) Biophys. J. 9, 1337–1350.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Gafni, R. L. Modlin, and L. Brand (1975) Biophys. J. 15, 263–280.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. R. Bevington (1969) Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Fletcher (1981) Practical Methods of Optimization, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. N. Chowdhury, Z. S. Kolber, and M. D. Barkley (1991) Rev. Sci. Instrum. 62, 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. R. Lakowicz (1983) Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Grinvald and I. Z. Steinberg (1974) Anal. Biochem. 59, 583–598.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. J. Cross and G. R. Fleming (1984) Biophys. J. 46, 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  18. W. E. Blumberg, R. E. Dale, J. Eisinger, and D. Zuckerman (1974) Biopolymers 13, 1607–1620.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Vanderkooi, S. Fischkoff, B. Chance, and R. A. Cooper (1974) Biochemistry 13, 1589–1595.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Ehrenberg and R. Rigler (1974) Chem. Phys. 4, 390–401.

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. Kask, P. Piksarv, Ü. Mets, M. Pooga, and E. Lippmaa (1987) Eur. Biophys. J. 14, 257–261.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William R. Laws.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rachofsky, E.L., Wolf, B., Bialik, C.N. et al. A General Method for Constrained Analysis of Fluorescence Anisotropy Decay: Application of the Steady-State Anisotropy. Journal of Fluorescence 9, 379–390 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020504511962

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020504511962

Navigation