Skip to main content
Log in

Network Activity in Neurons of the Motor and Prefrontal Areas of the Cortex in Trained Cats in Conditions of Systemic Administration of m-Cholinoreceptor Blockers

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Experiments on five cats already trained to an operant conditioned food-procuring reflex to light were used to study the network activity of cells in the frontal and motor areas of the cortex accompanying disruption of conditioned reflex behavior in conditions of systemic administration of m-cholinoreceptor blockers. The activity of cortical neurons and their network properties were assessed using auto- and cross-correlation histograms. Doses of central m-cholinoreceptor blockers (the non-selective blocker scopolamine and the relatively selective m1-cholinoreceptor blocker trihexyphenidyl) disrupted performance of the operant motor reflex but had no effect on the appearance of contextual behavior and responses to switching on of the conditioned signal (standing up, elevating the paw). This was accompanied by 1) changes in the patterns of neuron activity in the moor and frontal areas of the cortex, with increases in train, rhythmic, and rhythmic train activity in cortical cells; 2) appearance of synchronicity in the operation of cortical neurons; 3) decreases in the numbers of direct interneuronal connections in the motor and frontal areas of the cortex and in the numbers of connections between these structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. A. A. Azarashvili, Studies of Memory Mechanisms Using Dissociated Learning [in Russian], Pushchino (1998).

  2. P. V. Bukh-Viner, I. V. Volkov, and G. Kh. Merzhanova, “The spike 'collector',” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 40, No. 6, 1194 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  3. É. E. Dolbakyan, T. A. Tarakanova, and M. A. Fadeeva, “Interneuronal functional connections in the dog sensorimotor cortex,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 44, No. 1, 112 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  4. U. G. Gasanov, Systems Activity of Cortical Neurons during Learning [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. I. Maiorov, “Mechanisms of the formation of cat motor cortex neuron responses associated with triggering of a conditioned reflex consisting of placing the limb on a support: a hypothesis,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 44, No. 6, 963 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. I. Maiorov and Shi Lide, “Responses of cat motor cortex neurons to electrical stimulation of the base of the forebrain used as the conditioned signal for a reflex consisting of placing the forelimb on a support,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 49, No. 1, 118 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Kh. Merzhanova, “The effects of disulfiram on the mutually dependent activity of cortical neurons in trained cats,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 37, No. 6, 1047 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Kh. Merzhanova, É. E. Dolbakyan, and V. N. Khokhlova, “Interactions between neurons of the amygdala and hypothalamus during conditioned reflex behavior with choice for reinforcement quality in cats,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 49, No. 5, 723 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. N. Khokhlova, G. Kh. Merzhanova, and É. E. Dolbakyan, “The role of muscarinic cholinoreceptors in reproducing an operant foodrelated reflex in cats,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 50, No. 3, 482 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Abeles, “The quantification and graphic display of correlations among three spike trains,” IEEE Trans. BIOmed. England., 30, 235 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. M. Aertsen and G. L. Gerstein, “Evaluation of neuronal connectivity: sensitivity of cross-correlation,” Brain Res., 340, No. 2, 341 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Agmon and B. W. Connors, “Repetitive burst-firing neurons in the deep layers of mouse somatosensory cortex,” Neurosci. Lett., 99, No. 1–2, 137 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. Beaulieu and P. Somogyi, “Enrichment of cholinergic synaptic terminals on GABAergic neurons and coexistence of immunoreactive GABA and choline acetyltransferase in the same synaptic terminals in the striate cortex of the cat,” J. Comp. Neurol., 304, No. 4, 666 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Bolde, B. Cusack, and E. Richelson, “Antagonism by antimuscarinic and neuroleptic compounds at the five cloned human muscarinic cholinergic receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells,” J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 260, No. 2, 576 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  15. F. P. Bymaster, I. Hath, J. C. Hendrix, et al., “Comparative behavioral and neurochemical activities of cholinergic antagonists in rats,” J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 267, No. 1, 16 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Chagnac-Amitai and B. W. Connors, “Synchronized excitation and inhibition driven by intrinsically bursting neurons in neocortex,” J. Neurophysiol., 62, No. 5, 1149 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Chagnac-Amitai and B. W. Connors, “Horizontal spread of synchronized activity in neocortex and its control by GABA-mediated inhibition,” J. Neurophysiol., 61, 747 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Chagnac-Amitai, H. J. Lugmann, and D. A. Prince, “Burst generating and regular spiking layer 5 pyramidal neurons of rat neocortex have different morphological features,” J. Comp. Neurol., 296, No. 4, 598 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  19. B. W. Connors, “Initiation of synchronized neuronal bursting in neocortex,” Nature, 310, 685 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Davies and A. J. Maloney, “Selective loss of cholinergic neurons in Alzheimer's disease,” Lancet, 2, 1403 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  21. F. Dorje, J. Wess, G. Lambrecht, et al., “Antagonist binding profiles of five cloned human muscarinic receptor subtypes,” J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 256, No. 2, 727 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. J. Eggermont, G. M. Smith, and D. Bowman, “Spontaneous burst firing in cat primary auditory cortex: age and depth dependence and its effect on neural interaction measures,” J. Neurophysiol., 69, No. 4, 1292 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  23. T. F. Freund and G. Buzsaki, “Interneurons of the hippocampus,” Hippocampus. 6, No. 4, 347 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. M. Fuster, “Network memory,”, Trends Neurosci., 20, 451 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. P. Georgopoulos, “Higher order motor control,” Ann. Rev. Neurosci., 14, 361 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  26. K. Graham and J. Duffin, “Cross-correlation of medullary expiratory neurons in the cat,” Exp. Neurol., 73, No. 2, 451 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. J. Hagan, J. H. Jansen, and C. L. Broekkamp, “Blockade of spatial learning by the M1 muscarinic antagonist pirenzipine,” Psychopharmacology, 93, No. 4, 470 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. I. Levey, C. A. Kitt, W. F. Simonds, et al., “Identification and localization of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor proteins in brain with subtype-specific antibodies,” J. Neurosci., 11, No. 10, 3218 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. Li, R. P. Yasuda, S. J. Wall, et al., “distribution of m2 muscarinic receptors in rat brain using antisera selective for m2 receptors,” Moll. Pharmacol., 40, No. 1, 28 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  30. M. S. Livingston and D. H. Hubel, “Effects of sleep and arousal on the processing of visual information in the cat,” Nature, 291, 554 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  31. A. Lysakowski, B. H. Wainer, G. Bruce, et al., “An atlas of the regional and laminar distribution of choline acetyltransferase immunoreactivity in rat cerebral cortex,” Neurosci., 28, 291 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  32. D. A. McCormick, “Cellular mechanisms underlying cholinergic and noradrenergic modulation of neuronal firing mode in the cat and guinea pig dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus,” J. Neurosci., 12, No. 1, 278 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  33. R. Metherate and J. H. Ashe, “Basal forebrain stimulation modifies auditory cortex responsiveness by an action at muscarinic receptors,” Brain Res., 558, No. 1, 163 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  34. R. Metherate, C. L. Cox, and J. H. Ashe, “Cellular bases of neocortical activation: modulation of neural oscillations by the nucleus basalis and endogenous acetylcholine,” J. Neurosci., 12, No. 12, 4701 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Y. Nakagawa, Y. Ishibashi, T. Yoshii, and E. Tagashira, “Muscimol stimulates state-dependent learning in Morris water maze task in rats,” Brain Res., 681, No. 1–2, 126 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  36. D. A. Overton, “Historical context of state-dependent learning and discriminative drug effects,” Behav. Pharmacol., 2, 253 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  37. F. Reinoso-Suarez, Topographischer Hirnatlas der Katze (Fur Experimental-Physiologische Untersuchungen [in German]), Darmstadt (1961).

  38. K. Semba, “The cholinergic basal forebrain: a critical role in cortical arousal,” Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 295, 197 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  39. D. E. Shulz, C. Shuki, S. Haidarliu, and E. Ahissar, “Differential effects of acetylcholine in neuronal activity and interactions in the auditory cortex of the guinea pig,” Eur. J. Neurosci., 9, 369 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  40. D. E. Shulz, R. Sosnik, V. Ego, et al., “Neuronal analogue of state-dependent learning,” Nature, 403, 549 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  41. W. Singer, A. K. Engel, A. K. Kreiter, et al., “Neuronal assemblies: Necessity, signature, detectability,” Trends Cogn. Sci., 1, 252–261 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  42. M. Steriade and R. W. McCarley, Brainstem Control of Wakefulness and Sleep, Plenum Press, New York (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  43. E. A. van der Zee and P. G. Luiten, “Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the hippocampus, neocortex, and amygdala: a review of immunocytochemical localization in relation to learning and memory,” Progr. Neurobiol., 58, No. 5, 409 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  44. S. J. Wall, R. P. Yasuda, F. Hory, et al., “Production of antisera selective for m1 muscarinic using fusion proteins: distribution of m1 receptors in rat brain,” Moll. Pharmacol., 39, No. 5, 643 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khokhlova, V.N., Merzhanova, G.K. & Dolbakyan, É.E. Network Activity in Neurons of the Motor and Prefrontal Areas of the Cortex in Trained Cats in Conditions of Systemic Administration of m-Cholinoreceptor Blockers. Neurosci Behav Physiol 32, 631–642 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020465829338

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020465829338

Keywords

Navigation