Abstract
The feminization of management is a recurring theme in both popular and scientific management literature. However, several studies have shown that successful managers are generally attributed predominantly masculine characterics. In this study, gender typing of the manager role was studied in a sample of 143 management students (74 men, 69 women) in the Netherlands. As was hypothesized, on a checklist with masculine, feminine, and gender-neutral traits, masculine characteristics were rated as more applicable to successful managers than feminine characteristics, but gender-neutral characteristics were rated even more applicable. Analysis of the wording used to describe a successful manager on an open-ended question showed that participants used either gender-neutral words or (generic) “he.” This finding indicates that the successful manager is still imagined as a man, even though on a checklist this manager seems to possess predominantly gender-neutral traits. It is concluded that more methodological variety is needed in the study of gender typing of successful managers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Brenner, O. C., Tomkiewicz, J., & Schein, V. E. (1989). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics revisited. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 662-669.
Chater, K., & Gaster, R. (1995). The equality myth: A guide for women who want to make a difference in the world of business and for men who are ready for change. St. Leonards, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
Deal, J. J., & Stevenson, M. A. (1998). Perceptions of female and male managers in the 1990s: Plusça change.... Sex Roles, 38, 287-300.
Deaux, K., & Kite, M. E. (1987). Thinking about gender. In B. B. Hess & M. M. Ferree (Eds.), Analyzing gender (pp. 92-117). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Fiske, S. T., & Stevens, L. E. (1993). What's so special about sex? Gender stereotyping and discrimination. In S. Oskamp & M. Constanzo (Eds.), Gender issues in contemporary society (pp. 173-196). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Fondas, N. (1997). Feminization unveiled: Management qualities in contemporary writings. Academy of Management Review, 22, 257-282.
Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763-775.
Hamilton, M. C. (1988). Using masculine generics: Does generic he increase male bias in the user's imagery? Sex Roles, 19, 785-799.
Heilman, M. E. (1983). Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 5, pp. 195-214). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Heilman, M. E. (1997). Sex discrimination and the affirmative action remedy: The role of sex stereotypes. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 877-889.
Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., Martell, R. F., & Simon, M. C. (1989). Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 935-942.
Helgesen, S. (1990). The female advantage. Women's way of leadership. New York: Doubleday.
Kanter, R. M. (1989). The new managerial work. Harvard Business Review, 67(6), 85-92.
Kunda, Z., Sinclair, S., & Griffin, D. (1997). Equal ratings but separate meanings: Stereotypes and the construal of traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 720-734.
Mintzberg, H. (1989). Mintzberg on management. New York: Free Press.
Peters, T. (1987). Thriving on chaos. New York: Knopf.
Powell, G. N., & Butterfield, D. A. (1979). The “good manager”: Masculine or androgynous? Academy of Management Journal, 22, 395-403.
Powell, G. N., & Butterfield, D. A. (1989). The “good manager”: Did androgyny fare better in the 1980s? Group and Organization Studies, 14, 216-233.
Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 629-645.
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash towards agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle-managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1004-1010.
Schein, V. E. (1973). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 95-100.
Schein, V. E. (1975). Relationships between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 340-344.
Schein, V. F. (1976). Think manager—Think male. Atlanta Economic Review, 26, 21-24.
Schein, V. E., Mueller, R., Lituchy, T., & Liu, J. (1996). Think manager—Think male: A global phenomenon? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 33-41.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2001). Human Development Report 2001. Available from http://www.undp.org/hdr2001
Van Vianen, A. E. M., & Willemsen, T. M. (1992). The employment interview: The role of sex stereotypes in the evaluation of male and female job applicants in the Netherlands. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 471-491.
Willemsen, T. M., & Fischer, A. H. (1999). Assessing multiple facets of gender identity: The Gender Identity Questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 84, 561-562.
Willemsen, T. M., & Jacobs, M. J. G. (2001, June). Looking for new patterns of work and care: An international overview. Paper presented at the conference “New patterns of family relations/Nouveaux modèles de relations familiales,” Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Williams, J. E., & Best, D. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multination study (Rev. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Willemsen, T.M. Gender Typing of the Successful Manager—A Stereotype Reconsidered. Sex Roles 46, 385–391 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020409429645
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020409429645