Abstract
This article interrogates welfare reform policies that restrict welfare reliant mothers' access to education and training. It focuses on how these policies have been implemented through the Indiana Manpower Placement and Comprehensive Training Program (IMPACT), Indiana's “work first” response to women's growing experience of poverty. Using methods of inquiry inspired by Dorothy E. Smith's articulation of “institutional ethnography,” a case study is developed to investigate the critical disjuncture that arises when welfare reliant mothers attempt to navigate these policies in the context of Indiana's extended political economy. It is argued that through these restrictive policies, welfare reliant mothers are forced into Indiana's unrelenting low-wage labor market, increasing the pervasiveness of poverty and further perpetuating the reproduction of inequality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amott, T. (1993). Caught in the crisis: Women and the U.S. economy today. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Anderson, M. (1978). Welfare: The political economy of welfare reform in the United States. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution.
Birkett Morris, E. (2000). Moms on welfare face obstacles to higher education. Women's Enews. NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund. Retrieved from http://www. womensenews.org /article. cfm?aid=283&context=archive
Blank, R. (1995). Outlook for the U.S. labor market and prospects for low-wage entry jobs. In D. Nightingale & R. Havemen (Eds.), The work alternative: Welfare reform and the realities of the job market (pp. 33–69).Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
Blank, R. (1998). Labor market dynamics and part-time work. In S. Polachek (Ed.), Research in Labor Economics, 17 (pp. 57–93). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
Blau, D., & Tekin, E. (2001). The determinants and consequences of child care subsidy receipt by low-income families. In B. Meyer & G. Duncan (Eds.), The incentives of government programs and the well-being of families. Retrieved May 25, 2001, from http://www:jcpr.org/book/
Boris, E. (1998). When work is slavery. Social Justice, 25, 28–46.
Clinton, W. (1999, December). President Clinton's weekly radio address. Federal Information Systems Corporation.
Corcoran, M., & Loeb, S. (1999, Spring). Will wages grow with experience for welfare mothers? Focus, 20, 20–21.
Ditmar Coffield, C. (2000). Regulating knowledge: A critical institutional ethnography of the Indiana Manpower Placement and Comprehensive Training Program (IMPACT). In V. Demos & M. Texler Segal (Series Eds.), Advances in gender research: Vol. 4. Social change for women and children (pp. 55–89). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
Ditmar Coffield, C. (2001). “Manpower placement” and “comprehensive training”: The IMPACT of Indiana's “work first” model. Journal of Poverty: Innovations on Social, Political & Economic Inequalities, 5, 5–20.
Edin, K. J. (1995, Fall/Winter). The myths of dependence and self-sufficiency: Women, welfare, and low-wage work. Focus, 17. Retrieved October 2, 1999, from http:// www.ssc.wisc.edu/irp/pubs/focusold/17.2.a/edin.txt
Edin, K. J., & Lein, L. (1997). Making ends meet: How single mothers survive welfare and low-wage work. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Fein, D. J., Beecroft, E., Hamilton, H., & Lee, W. S. (1998). The Indiana welfare reform evaluation: Program implementation and economic impacts after two years. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana Family and Social Services Administration.
Fraser, N., & Gordon, L. (1994). A genealogy of dependency: Tracing a keyword of the U.S. welfare state. Signs, 19, 309–336.
Gilder, G. (1981). Wealth and poverty. New York: Basic Books.
Goetz, S. J., Tegegne, F., Zimmerman, J. N., Debertin, D. L., Singh, S. P., Muhammed, S., & Ekanem, E. (1999). Economic downturns and welfare reform: An exploratory county-level analysis. Retrieved April 2, 2001, from http://ext.msstate.edu/srdc/ activities/ goetzdraft.htm
Haveman, R., & J. Schwabish. (1999). Macroeconomic performance and the poverty rate: A return to normalcy? (Discussion Paper 1187-99). Madison, WI: Institute for Research on Poverty.
Indiana Family and Social Services Administration. (1997). IMPACT program policy manual. Indianapolis, IN: Author.
Jackson, D. Z. (1998, July 16). Welfare recipients getting cheated out of education. The Boston Globe, p. A15.
Johnson, M. (1998, February 8). W-2 work or else: In W-2 and forced out of school. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, p. A1.
Kahn, K. (1998). Workfare forces single mothers to abandon college education. Sojourner, 24, 31–32.
Kleppner, P., & Theodore, N. (1997a). Work after welfare: Is the Midwest's booming economy creating enough jobs? (Midwest Job Gap Project). DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University; Chicago Urban League.
Kleppner, P., & Theodore, N. (1997b). Work after welfare: Is Indiana's booming economy creating enough jobs? (Midwest Job Gap Project). Northern Illinois University; Chicago Urban League. C. Ditmar Coffield 283
Kornbluh, F. (1997, October 5). Class dismissed: Welfare recipients fight to stay in college. In These Times, pp. 18–20.
Lackey, M. K. (1998). Women on welfare mobilize for their college degrees and for economic justice. Sojourner, 24, 21–24.
Larin, K., & McNichol, E. (1997). Pulling apart: A state-by-state analysis of income trends. Washington, D.C.: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
Levitan, S. A., & Shapiro, I. (1987). Working but poor: America's contradiction. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
McCall, L. (2001). Complex inequality: Gender, class, and race in the new economy. New York: Routledge.
Mead, L. M. (1986). Beyond entitlement: The social obligations of citizenship. New York: New York Free Press.
Murray, C. A. (1984). Losing ground: American social policy, 1950-1980. New York: Basic Books.
Naples, N. A. (1998). Grassroots warriors: Activist mothering, community work, and the war on poverty. New York: Routledge.
O'Neill, J. (1999, April 25). New rules alter course of students on welfare. Philadelphia Inquirer, p. B1.
Pavetti, L. (1997). Against the odds: Steady employment among low-skilled women. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
Pavetti, L. (1999, Spring). How much more can welfare mothers work? Focus, 20, 16–19.
Paxson, C., & Waldfogel, J. (2001). Welfare reforms, family resources, and child maltreatment. In B. Meyer & G. Duncan (Eds.), The incentives of government programs and the well-being of families. Retrieved May 25, 2001, from http://www. jcpr.org/book/
Pearce, D., & Brooks, J. (1999). The self-sufficiency standard for Indiana. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana Coalition on Housing and Homeless Issues.
Pierre, R. E. (1997, December 29). Trading textbooks for jobs. The Washington Post, p. A01.
Schmidt, P. (1998, January 23). States discourage welfare recipients from pursuing higher education. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A34.
Schram, S. (2000). After welfare: The culture of postindustrial social policy. New York: New York University Press.
Scott, E. K., Edin, K., London, A. S., & Mazelis, J. M. (1999, August). My children come first: Welfare-reliant women's post-TANF views of work-family tradeoffs, neighborhoods, and marriage (JCPR Working Paper 115). Joint Center for Poverty Research.
Shaw, E. C., Jr. (1998, August 7). Off welfare, on to jobs [Letter to the editor]. The Washington Post, p. A24.
Smith, D. E. (1986). Institutional ethnography: A feminist method. Resources for Feminist Research, 15, 6–13.
Smith, D. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Smith, D. E. (1989). Sociological theory: Methods of writing patriarchy. In J. C. Alexander & J. H. Turner (Series Eds.) & R. A. Wallace (Vol. Ed.), Key issues in sociological theory: Vol. 4. Feminism and sociological theory (pp. 34–64). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Smith, D. E. (1990). The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knowledge. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Smith, D. E. (1999). Writing the social: Critique, theory, and investigations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Smith Madsen, S. (2001). The fear of the coming white matriarchy: From welfare to the chapel-curing women's poverty with wedlock. Unpublished manuscript, Emory University.
Smith Madsen, S. (in press). From welfare to academe: Welfare reform as college-educated welfare mothers know it. In V. Adair & S. Dahlberg (Eds.), The promise of education: Single mothers, welfare, and poverty. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Spalter-Roth, R. M., & Hartmann, H. I. (1994). AFDC recipients as care-givers and workers: A feminist approach to income security policy for American women. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State, and Society, 1, 190–210.
Spalter-Roth, R. M., Hartmann, H. I., & Andrews, L. (1992). Combining work and welfare: An alternative anti-poverty strategy. Washington, D.C.: Institute for Women's Policy Research.
Strawn, J. (1998). Beyond job search or basic education. Washington, D.C.: Center for Law and Social Policy.
U. S. General Accounting Office. (1998). Welfare reform: States are restructuring programs to reduce welfare dependence (Publication No. HEHS-98-109). Washington, DC: Author.
Warren, C. R. (1998). Is there a job gap in Indiana? Indianapolis, IN: Indiana Economic Development Council, Inc.
Wright, S. W. (1997). Sallie's story: Welfare reform restricts college access. Community College Week, 9(14), 14–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Coffield, C.D. Welfare Reform in Indiana: The Political Economy of Restricting Access to Education and Training. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 23, 261–284 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020395110470
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020395110470