Abstract
Sorghum midge (Stenodiplosis sorghicola Coquillett) is an important pest of grain sorghum, and host plant resistance is one of the most effective means of controlling this pest. Several studies have shown that resistance to sorghum midge is associated with short and tight glumes, faster rate of grain development, and tannins. However, some recent studies suggested that time of flowering is the principal component of resistance to sorghum midge. Therefore, we conducted a series of experiments under laboratory and field conditions on the flowering behaviour of a diverse array of midge-resistant and midge-susceptible genotypes to quantify the contribution of time of flowering in genotypic resistance to sorghum midge. Time of flowering under field and laboratory conditions did not show any differences between midge-resistant and midge-susceptible genotypes. Time to maximum flowering varied considerably between the rainy and the post-rainy seasons. Under field conditions, most of the spikelets in the midge-resistant lines opened between 0000 and 0400 h, while most of the spikelets in the susceptible check, CSH 1, opened at 0200 h. Under light and dark conditions in the laboratory, most of the spikelets opened at 0300 h in all genotypes, irrespective of their level of resistance to the sorghum midge. However, flowering events continued for a longer period under dark conditions outside the laboratory. There were no differences in oviposition in panicles on the midge-resistant genotype, ICSV 745, infested between 0200 and 0600 h, and significantly more eggs were laid in spikelets of the susceptible check, CSH 1, than in the midge-resistant, ICSV 745, at all infestation times. The peak oviposition was recorded at 0945 h irrespective of the level of resistance to sorghum midge, and significantly more eggs were laid in the spikelets of CSH 1 and Swarna than in ICSV 745 and ICSV 197. There was no evidence of change in the susceptibility of sorghum midge-resistant genotypes when infested at different times in relation to time of flowering. Therefore, flowering behaviour of sorghum genotypes seems to play little role in genotypic susceptibility to sorghum midge.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Diarisso, N.Y., B.B. Pendleton, G.L. Teetes, G.C. Peterson & R.M. Anderson, 1998. Spikelet flowering time: cause of sorghum resistance to sorghum midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). J Econ Entomol 91: 1464–1470.
Faris, M.A., M. de A. Lira & A.F. de S.L. Viega, 1979. Stability of sorghum midge resistance. Crop Sci 19: 557–560.
Hanna, W.W., M.D. Richardson, B.R. Wiseman & C.W. Bacon, 1999. Midge resistance and hydrocyanic acid content of Sorghum bicolor. Florida Entomol 82: 354–356.
Harris, K.M., 1976. The sorghum midge. Ann Appl Biol 64: 114–118.
Johnson, J.W., D.T. Rosenow & G.L. Teetes, 1973. Resistance to the sorghum midge in converted sorghum cultivars. Crop Sci 13: 754–755.
Naik, M.R., I.G. Hiremath, P.M. Salimath & S.U. Patil, 1996. Relationship of biochemical compounds with midge, Contarinia sorghicola (coq.) resistance in sorghum. Mysore J Agric Sci 30: 142–148.
Rossetto, C.J., N.V. Banzatto, J.F.M. Lara & J.L. Overman, 1975. AF 28, a Sorghum bicolor variety resistant to sorghum midge, Contarinia sorghicola. Sorghum Newsl 18: 5.
Rossetto, C.J., G. Nagai & J.L. Overman, 1984. Mechanisms of resistance in sorghum variety AF 28 to Contarinia sorghicola (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). J Econ Entomol 77: 1439–1440.
Santos, J.H.R. & C.M. Carmo, 1974. Evaluation of resistance to Contarinia sorghicola of sorghum lines from Cameroon. Sorghum Newslett 17: 10–11.
Sharma, H.C., 1993. Host-plant resistance to insects in sorghum and its role in integrated pest management. Crop Prot 12: 11–34.
Sharma, H.C., B.L. Agrawal, P. Vidyasagar, C.V. Abraham & K.F. Nwanze, 1993a. Identification and utilization of resistance to sorghum midge, Contarinia sorghicola (Coquillett), in India. Crop Prot 12: 343–351.
Sharma, H.C., S.Z. Mukuru, E. Manyasa & J.W. Were, 1999. Breakdown of resistance to sorghum midge, Stenodiplosis sorghicola. Euphytica 109: 131–140.
Sharma, H.C. & P. Vidyasagar, 1994. Antixenosis component of resistance to sorghum midge, Contarinia sorghicola Coq. in Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Ann Appl Biol 124: 495–507.
Sharma, H.C., P. Vidyasagar & K. Leuschner, 1988. No-choice cage technique to screen for resistance to sorghum midge (Cecidomyiidae: Diptera). J Econ Entomol 81: 415–422.
Sharma, H.C., P. Vidyasagar & K. Leuschner, 1990. Components of resistance to the sorghum midge, Contarinia sorghicola Coq. Ann Appl Biol 116: 327–333.
Sharma, H.C., P. Vidyasagar & V. Subramanian, 1993b. Antibiosis component of resistance in sorghum to midge, Contarinia sorghicola. Ann Appl Biol 123: 469–483.
Shyamsunder, J., R. Parameshwarappa, H.K. Nagaraja & N.B. Kajjari, 1975. A new genotype in sorghum resistant to midge (Contarinia sorghicola). Sorghum Newsl 18: 33.
Waquil, J.M., G.L. Teetes & G.C. Peterson, 1986a. Sorghum midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) adult ovipositional behaviour on resistant and susceptible sorghum hybrids. J Econ Entomol 79: 530–532.
Waquil, J.M., G.L. Teetes & G.C. Peterson, 1986b. Comparison of immature sorghum midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) development on resistant and susceptible sorghums. J Econ Entomol 79: 833–837.
Wiseman, B.R. & W.W. McMillian. 1968. Resistance in sorghum to sorghum midge, Contarinia sorghicola (Coquillett) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). J Ent Soc Ga 3: 147.
Wiseman, B.R., W.W. McMillian & N.W. Widstrom. 1973. Registration of S-GIRL-MR-1 sorghum germplasm. Crop Sci 13: 398.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, H., Hariprasad, K. Flowering events in sorghum in relation to expression of resistance to sorghum midge, Stenodiplosis sorghicola . Euphytica 127, 411–419 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020387322539
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020387322539
- flowering pattern
- plant resistance
- resistance mechanisms
- Sorghum bicolor
- sorghum midge
- Stenodiplosis sorghicola