Abstract
In this paper I propose to discuss what I view as a major aspect in the conception of the role of the canon in regulating culture, namely, the question of how it is related to current cultural production and consumption. I then propose to discuss some aspects of the process of canon formation. The scope of problematization prevailing in the Anglo-American debate about the canon seems to be too predictable and limited as a conceptual framework for a serious historical research (rather than “critique”) into processes of canon formation. Revolving around the question of cultural values, this discourse fails to exceed the limits of the same reductive, normative conception of “high” culture (in the sense of the body of select artifacts), which it basically aspires to challenge. Its commitment to a progressive ideological agenda notwithstanding, this discourse helps reinforcing - rather than revolutionizing - the power of the canon. In the final analysis, this discourse fails to deal with the canon as a general mechanism, indispensable for the organization and evolution of societies. Regarding the first issue, two problems will be discussed, as follows: (1) The question of transitoriness: the fascination with relativism and contingencies of values leads to viewing the canon as entirely negotiable and versatile, far more than it is so in reality. This view underestimates the specific weight of established canons as accumulative, widely shared and persistent cultural reservoirs, which endure the vicissitude of dominant tastes promoted by different groups in different times. As such, the status of the canon is almost irreversibly secured. The formation of the canon is hence a long-term process occurring in addition to the short-term process of shifting trends and legging behind it. (2) The question of generativeness: the nexus usually taken for granted between the valorization of artifacts and their recycling in the cultural market is misleading. Canonicity is independent of whether or not the items serve as generative models for current cultural production. Often, the sanctification of items through canonization rituals suspends the availability of these items as active models for interfering with the actual cultural market. Consequently, the canon operates as a stabilizing mechanism (a cultural “sock-absorber”) in the ongoing cultural battlefield, and may equally invoked, as a source of legitimation, by all of the participating rival groups. Regarding the second issue, it is argued that while all cultural practices have “canonical rules”(in the sense of accepted standards), not all have canons in the full sense of a tangible pantheon. The making of such a pantheon depends on the existence of an autonomous field with authorized consecrating agencies. Therefore, in cases of canon formation in (as yet) “canonless” fields, the canonisers need to be able to act as compatible agents in other, highly canonized fields, so as to borrow models from these field, in order to confer canonicity on the cultural production in their own fields. In all canonizing processes, the canonisers" strategies oscillate between the tendency to consolidate existing canonized repertoire and that of prefiguring a new one and present it as canonical from the outset. Usually, however, the prefiguration of new canonized repertoire comes only late in the process of canon formation, after a prolonged phase of conformity with the existing canon.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Behler, Diana. 1978. The Theory of the Novel in Early German Romanticism. Utah studies in literature and linguistics, Vol. 11. Berne: Lang.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1980. "Haute couture et haute culture." In Questions de sociologie, Paris: Edition de Minuit, 196-206.
-. 1980a "Quelques propriétés des champs". In Questions de sociologie, Paris: Edition de Minuit, 113-120.
-. 1984 [1979]. "The Economy of Practices". Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Trans. Richard Nice. London & New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 97-256.
-. 1985. "The Market of Symbolic Goods." Poetics 14: 13-44.
Browne, Ray B. and Roland J. Ambrosetti, eds. 1972. Popular Culture and Curricula. Bowling Green, Ohio: Bowling Green University Popular Press.
Carroll, Paul (ed.). 1968. The Young American Poets. Introd. by James Dickey. New York: Follett.
Coetzee, J. M. 1988. White Writing. On the Culture of Letters in South Africa. New Haven and London: Radix, and Yale University Press.
Colls, Robert and Philip Dodd. 1987. Englishness. Politics and Culture 1880-1920. London, New York, and Sydney: Croom Helm.
Corse, Sarah M. 1997. Nationalism and Literature. The Politics of Culture in Canada and the United States. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
Davis, Lennard J., and M. Bella Mirabella, eds. 1990. Left Politics and the Literary Profession. New York: Columbia University Press.
Davey, F. 1976. "Leonard Cohen and Bob Dylan: Poetry and the Popular Song". In Gnarowski, M. ed., Leonard Cohen, The Artist and His Critics, Toronto: McGraw Hill, 111-124.
Dobson, Michael. 1992. The Making of the National Poet. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Drory, Rina. 1988. The Emergence of Jewish-Arab Contacts at the Beginning of the 10th Century (Hebrew). Tel-Aviv: Porter Institute & HaKibbutz HaMeuxad.
Elias, Norbert. 1978 [1939]. The Civilizing Process. Trans. Edmund Jephcott. Vol. 1. The History of Manners. New York: Pantheon.
-. 1983 [1969]. The Court Society. Trans Edmund Jephcott. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Fiedler, Leslie A. 1971. "The Children's Hour, or the Return of the Vanishing Longfellow; Some Reflections of the Future of Poetry." In Liberation; New Essays of the Humanities in Revolution, Ed. I. Hassan, Conn. Middletown 149-75.
-. 1981. "Literature as an Institution: The View from 1980." In Leslie A. Fiedler and Houston A. Jr. Baker. eds. English Literature. Opening up the Canon, 73-91.
Even-Zohar 1997. "Factors and Dependencies in Culture: A Revised Draft for Polysystem Culture Research." Canadian Review of Comparative Literature 24 (1): 15-34.
Fish, Stanley. 1980. Is There a Text in This Class? Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Gaeta, Franco. 1982. "Dal comune ala corte rinascimentale". In Letteratura Italiana: Il letterato e le istituzioni, ed. Roberto Asor Rosa. Torino: Einaudi, 149-255.
Gates, Henry Louis Jr. 1992. Loose Canons. Notes on the Culture Wars. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ginsberg, Allen. 1975. First Blues. New York: Full Court Press.
Gorak, Jan. 1991. The Making of the Modern Canon. Genesis and Crisis of a Literary Idea. London: Athlone.
Gray, M. 1981 (1972). The Art of Bob Dylan. London: Hamlyn.
Guillory, John. 1993. Cultural Capital. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Halle, David. 1992. "The Audience for Abstract Art: Class, Culture, and Power". In Michele Lamont and Marcel Fornier. eds. Cultivating Difference. Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 131-151.
Haugen, Einar. 1996. Language Conflict and Language Planning: The Case of Modern Norwegian. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Hawkins, Harriet. 1990. "From 'King Lear' to 'King Kong' and Back: Shakespeare and Popular Modern Genres". In Classics and Trash. Tradition and Taboos in High Literature and Popular Modern Genres. New York, London, Toronto, Sydney, Tokyo, Singapore: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 103-138.
Heine, Heinrich. (1833). The Romantic School. Ed. Eliss Haverlock. London: Walter Scott Publishing Co.
Hernnstein-Smith, Barbara. 1988. Contingencies of Values: Alternative Perspective for Critical Theory. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Hohendahl, Peter Uwe. 1989 [1985]. Building a National Literature. The Case of Germany 1830-1870. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Huss, Boaz. 1998. "Sefer ha Zohar as a Canonical, Sacred and Holy Text: Changing Perspectives of the Book of Splendor between the Thirteenth and Eighteenth Centuries". The Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 7: 275-307.
Kernan, Alvin B. 1979. "The Poet's Place in the World. Images of the Poet in the Renaissance". In The Playwrite as Magician. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1-23.
Jakobson, Roman. 1962 (1921). "On Realism in the Arts". In Reading in Russian Poetics, ed. Ladislav Matejka (Ann Arbor): 29-36.
Jakobson, Roman and Petr Bogatyrev. 1982 (1929). "Folklore as a Special Form of Creativity". In The Prague School. Selected Writings, 1929-1946, ed. Peter Steiner. Texas University Press, 32-46.
Jusdanis, Gregory. 1991. Belated Modernity and Aesthetic Culture. Inventing National Literature. Theory and History of Literature, Vol. 81. Minneapolis and Oxford: University of Minnesota Press.
Lecker, Robert. 1995. Making it Real: The Canonization of English-Canadian Literature. Concord, Ontario: Anansi.
Levine, Lawrence W. 1988. Highbrow/Lowbrow: The Emergence of Cultural Hierarchy in America. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Lindenberg, Herbert. 1990. "The Normality of Canon Change." In The History in Literature: On Value, Genre, Institutions. New York: Columbia University Press, 131-147.
Lotman, Jurij. 1976. "Culture and Information." Dispositio 1 (3): 13-15.
-. 1977 [1974]. "The Dynamic Model of Semiotic System." Semiotica (3-4):193-210.
Muka?ovský, Jan. 1970 [1936]. Aestetic Function, Norm and Value as Social Facts (transl. by Mark E. Suino). Ann Arbor: Michigan Press.
Robson-Scott, William Douglas. 1965. The Literary Background of the Gothic Revival in Germany: A Chapter in the History of Taste. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Rodman, Gilbert B. 1994. "A Hero to Most? Elvis, Myth, and the Politics of Race". Cultural Studies 8 (3): 457-483.
Sela-Sheffy, Rakefet. 1999. Literarische Dynamik und Kulturbildung: Zur Konstruktion des Repertoires deutscher Literatur im ausgehenden 18. Jahrhunderts. Gerlingen: Bleicher Verlag.
-. 1999a. "Estrategias de canonización y el campo intelectual en la cultura alemana del siglo dieciocho". In: Teoría de los polisistemas. Ed. M. Iglesias. Madrid: ARCO Libros, 125-146.
Shavit, Zohar. 1986. Poetics of Children's Literature. Atlanta: The University of Georgia Press.
Sheffy, Rakefet. 1990. "The Concept of Canonicity in the Polysystem Theory." Poetics Today 11 (3): 511-522.
-. 1991. "Canonization of a Non-literary System: The Case of the Modern American Popular Song and its Contact with Poetry." In Oral/written, 177-185.
-. 1997. "Models and Habituses: Problems in the Idea of Cultural Repertoires." Canadian Review of Comparative Literature 24 (1): 35-47.
Shenhav, Yehuda. 1995. "From Chaos to Systems: The Engineering Foundation of Organization Theory, 1879-1932". Administrative Science Quarterly 40: 557-585.
Shumway, David. 1994. Creating American Civilization. A Genealogy of American literature as an Academic Discipline. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
Simpson, David. 1988. "Literary Criticism and the Return to 'history'" Critical Inquiry 14 (4): 721-47.
Sinha, Chris. 1988. Language and Representation. New York: New York University Press.
Smith, Thomas Spence. 1974. "Aestheticism and Social Structure: Style and Social Network in the Dandy Life". American Sociological Review 39 (5): 725-743.
Thompson, Michael. 1979. Rubbish Theory: The Creation and Destruction of Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tompkins, Jane. P. 1985. Sensational Designs: The Cultural Work of American Fiction, 1790-1860. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tynjanov, Jurij. 1969a [1924]. "Das literarische Factum." In Texte der Russische Formalisten, Ed Jurij Striedter. München: Fink, Vol. 1, 393-431.
-. 1969b [1927]. "Ñber die literarische Evolution." In Texte der Russische Formalisten, Ed Jurij Striedter, München: Fink, Vol. 1, 332-361.
Wienold, Götz. 1987. "Kanon und Hierarchiebildung in Sprache und Literatur: Sprachentwicklungstyp, Diglossie und Polysystem." In Kanon und Zensur: Archäologie der literarische Kommunikation II, eds. Aleida Assmann & Jan Assmann. München: Fink, 300-308.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sela-Sheffy, R. Canon Formation Revisited: Canon and Cultural Production. Neohelicon 29, 141–159 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020386207413
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020386207413