Abstract
Resource competition can influence plant fitness either directly, or indirectly by influencing the amount of herbivore damage received by plants in the field. We previously found that competition could constrain the constitutive and woundinduced expression of defensive trypsin inhibitors in pot-grown Brassica napus seedlings in the greenhouse, suggesting that the ability of a plant to chemically defend itself could be constrained by competition in the field. Guided by these results, we investigated whether competition would affect growth and the presence of herbivores and herbivore damage on B. napus plants in the field. We established sixteen 1 m 2 plots in the field in a 7 x7 mgrid. Nine two-week-old B. napus seedlings were transplanted from the greenhouse into each 1 m 2 plot. Half of the plots were kept weed-free and half were left to develop interspecific weed competi-tors.After six weeks, three randomly chosen plants in each plot were measured for height, number of leaves, leaf area removed by herbivores, and the presence of aphids, leaf miners, and eggs of ladybird beetles. Consistent with the induction of the shade-avoidance response, plants in plots with weed competitors were significantly taller and had half as many leaves as plants in weed-free plots. Competing plants also had 60% more leaf arearemoved by herbivores, an 80% higher proportion of leaves with aphids, and an equal proportion of leaves with leaf miners. In this study, weed competition had dramatic effects on growth, leaf area removal by herbivores, and the presence of aphids on B. napus plants in the field. Together with our demonstration that competition can constrain the expression of trypsin inhibitor activity, these results suggest that resource competition may limit theability of a plant to defend itself from natural enemies, leading to greater herbivory. In turn, increased herbivory on competing plants could exacerbate the direct effects of competition on plant fitness.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ballaré C.L., Scopel A.L. and Sanchez R.A. 1990. Far-red radiation reflected from adjacent leaves: an early signal of competition in plant canopies. Science 247: 329–332.
Bouma M. 1983. Diagnosis of mineral deficiencies using plant tests. In: Lauchli A. and Bieleski R.L. (eds), Inorganic Plant Nutrition Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 120–146.
Broadway R.M. 1995. Are insects resistant to plant proteinase inhibitors? Journal of Insect Physiology 41: 107–116.
Broadway R.M. and Duffey S.S. 1986. Plant proteinase inhibitors: Mechanism of action and effect on the growth and digestive physiology of larval Heliothis zea and Spodoptera exigua. Journal of Insect Physiology 32: 827–833.
Cipollini D.F. and Bergelson J. 2001. Plant density and nutrient availability constrain constitutive and wound-induced expression of trypsin inhibitors in Brassica napus L. Journal of Chemical Ecology 27: 593–610.
Cipollini D.F. and Schultz J.C. 1999. Exploring cost constraints on stem elongation in plants using phenotypic manipulation. American Naturalist 153: 236–242.
Dudley S.A. and Schmitt J. 1996. Testing the adaptive plasticity hypothesis: density-dependent selection on manipulated stem length in Impatiens capensis. American Naturalist 147: 445–465.
Edwards P.J., Wratten S.D. and Parker E.A. 1992. The ecological significance of rapid wound-induced changes in plants: insect grazing and plant competition. Oecologia 91: 266–272.
Felton G.W., Broadway R.M. and Duffey S.S. 1989. Inactivation of proteinase inhibitor activity by plant-derived quinones: complications for host plant resistance against noctuid herbivores. Journal of Insect Physiology 35: 981–990.
Gianoli E. and Niemeyer H. 1996. Environmental effects on the induction of wheat chemical defenses by aphid infestation. Oecologia 107: 549–552.
Grace J. and Tilman D. 1990. Perspectives on Plant Competition. Academic Press, New York.
Hacker S.D. and Bertness M.D. 1995. A herbivore paradox: why salt marsh aphids live on poor quality plants. American Naturalist 145: 192–210.
Hjalten J., Danell K. and Ericson L. 1993. Effect of simulated herbivory and intraspecific competition on the compensatory ability of juvenile birches. Ecology 74: 1136–1142.
Hjalten J., Danell K. and Ericson L. 1994. The impact of herbivory and competition on the phenolic concentration and palatability of juvenile birches. Oikos 71: 416–422.
Horner J.D. and Abrahamson W.G. 1992. Influence of plant geno-type and environment on oviposition preference and offspring survival in a gallmaking herbivore. Oecologia 90: 323–332.
Johnson R., Narvaez J., An G. and Ryan C.A. 1990. Expression of proteinase inhibitors I and II in transgenic tobacco plants: Effects on natural defense against Manduca sexta larvae. Proceeds of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 86: 9871–9875.
Karban R. 1993. Induced resistance and plant density of a native shrub, Gossypium thurberi, affect its herbivores. Ecology 74: 1–8.
Karban R. and Baldwin I.T. 1997. Induced Responses to Herbivory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Karban R., Brody A.K. and Schnathorst W.C. 1989. Crowding and a plant's ability to defend itself against herbivores and disease. American Naturalist 134: 749–760.
Koiwa H., Bressan R.A. and Hasegawa P.M. 1997. Regulation of proteinase inhibitors and plant defense. Trends in Plant Science 2: 379–384.
Larsson S.A., Wiren L., Lundgren L. and Ericsson T. 1986. Effects of light and nutrient stress on leaf phenolic chemistry in Salix dasyclados and susceptibility to Galerucella lineola (Coleoptera). Oikos 47: 205–210.
Lentz K. and Cipollini D.F. 1998. Effect of light and simulated herbivory on growth of the endangered northeastern bulrush, Scirpus ancistrochateus. Plant Ecology 139: 125–131.
Mattson W.J. 1980. Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 119–161.
Neter J., Kutner M.H., Nachtsheim C.J. and Wasserman W. 1996. Applied Linear Statistical Models. 4th edn. Irwin, Chicago.
Reader R.J. 1992. Herbivory as a confounding factor in an experiment measuring competition among plants. Ecology 73: 373–376.
Rosenthal G.A. and Janzen D.H. 1979. Herbivores: Their Interactions with Secondary Plant Metabolites. Academic Press, New York.
Rosenthal G.A. and Berenbaum M.R. 1992. Herbivores: Their Interactions with Secondary Plant Metabolites. Academic Press, San Diego.
Scriber J.M. 1984. Host Plant Suitability. In: Bell W.J. and Carde R.T. (eds), Chemical Ecology of Insects. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 159–202.
Steinger T. and Muller-Scharer H. 1992. Physiological and growth responses of Centaurea maculosa (Asteraceae) to root herbivory under varying levels of interspecific plant competition and soil nitrogen availability. Oecologia 91: 141–149.
Stout M.J., Brovont R.A. and Duffey S.S. 1998. Effect of nitrogen availability on expression of constitutive and inducible chemical defenses in tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum. Journal of Chemical Ecology 24: 945–963.
Stout M.J., Workman K.V., Bostock R.M. and Duffey S.S. 1998b. Stimulation and attenuation of induced resistance by elicitors and inhibitors of chemical induction in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) foliage. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 86: 267–279.
Mc Manus M.T. 1994. Accumulation of a chymotrypsin inhibitor in transgenic tobacco can effect growth of insect pests. Transgenic Research 3: 50–58.
Segarra-Carmona A. and Barbosa P. 1990. Influence of plant density onherbivory levels by Etiella zinckenella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on Glycine max and Crotolaria pallida. Environemntal Entomology 19: 640–647.
Baldwin 1998. Jasmonate-included responses are costly but benefit plants under attack in native populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 95: 8113–8118.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cipollini, D.F., Bergelson, J. Interspecific competition affects growth and herbivore damage of Brassica napus in the field. Plant Ecology 162, 227–231 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020377627529
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020377627529