Abstract
Video feedback has been shown to increase performance estimates on the part of speech anxious individuals (R. M. Rapee & K. Hayman, 1996). The present experiment tested a video feedback condition against 2 control conditions. A possible moderator of video feedback effects, the degree to which participants underrated their initial speech, was also tested, as was the possibility of mediation of video feedback's effects by increases in self-efficacy. Participants were 90 speech anxious undergraduate students. Although video feedback showed transitory effects across the sample as a whole, the effect was consistently positive for participants who highly underrated their first speech. Self-efficacy was an important predictor of change in self-perception of performance, but was not a mediator of video feedback's effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Aiken, L. S., & West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Ayres, J. (1986). Perceptions of speaking ability: An explanation for stage fright. Communication Education, 35, 275–287.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
Beatty, M. (1986). Communication apprehension and general anxiety. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1, 209–212.
Beatty, M. (1987). Communication apprehension as a determinant of avoidance, withdrawal and performance anxiety. Communication Quarterly, 35, 202–217.
Beatty, M., Balfantz, G. L., & Kuwabara, A. Y. (1989). Trait-like qualities of selected variables assumed to be transient causes of performance state anxiety. Communication Education, 38, 277–289.
Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1987). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Garbin, M. G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 77–100.
Behnke, R. R., Sawyer, C. R., & King, P. E. (1987). The communication of public speaking anxiety. Communication Education, 36, 138–141.
Borkovec, T. D., & Nau, S. D. (1972). Credibility of analogue therapy rationales. Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 3, 257–260.
Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). Acognitive model for social phobia. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment (pp. 69–93). New York: Guilford.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hackman, A., Clark, D. M., & McManus, F. (2000). Recurrent images and early memories in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 601–610.
Hackman, A., Surawy, C., & Clark, D. M. (1998). Seeing yourself through others' eyes: A study of spontaneously occurring images in social phobia. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 26, 3–12.
Harvey, A. G., Clark, D. A., Ehlers, A., & Rapee, R. M. (2000). Social anxiety and self-impression: Cognitive preparation enhances the beneficial effects of video feedback following a stressful social task. Behavior Research and Therapy, 1183–1192.
Heimberg, R. G., Hope, D. A., Dodge, C. S., & Becker, R. E. (1990). DSM-III-R subtypes of social phobia: Comparison of generalized social phobics and public speaking phobics. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 178, 172–179.
Hinton, J. S., & Kramer, M. W. (1998). The impact of self-directed videotape feedback on students' selfreported levels of communication competence and apprehension. Communication Education, 47, 151–161.
Kazdin, A. E. (1974). Covert modeling, model similarity, and reduction of avoidance behavior. Behavior Therapy, 5, 325–340.
Rapee, R. M., & Hayman, K. (1996). The effects of video feedback on the self-evaluation of performance in socially anxious subjects. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 315–322.
Rapee, R. M., & Lim, L. (1992). Discrepancy between self-and observer ratings of performance in social phobics. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 728–731.
Rosenfeld, L. B., Grant, C. H., III, & McCroskey, J. C. (1995). Communication apprehension and selfperceived communication competence of academically gifted students. Communication Education, 44, 79–86.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schlenker, B. R., & Leary, M. (1982). Social anxiety and self-presentation:Aconceptualization and model. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 641–669.
Strauman, T. J., & Higgins, E. T. (1988). Self-discrepancies as predictors of vulnerability to distinct syndromes of chronic emotional distress. Journal of Personality, 56, 685–707.
Watson, D., & Friend, R. (1969). Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 448–457.
Williams, S. L. (1995). Self-efficacy, anxiety, and phobic disorders. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaption, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp. 69–107). New York: Plenum.
Williams, S. L. (1996). Therapeutic changes in phobic behavior are mediated by changes in perceived selfefficacy. In R. M. Rapee (Ed.), Current controversies in the anxiety disorders (pp. 373–376). NewYork: Guilford.
Zane, G., & Williams, S. L. (1993). Performance-related anxiety in agoraphobia: Treatment procedures and cognitive mechanisms of change. Behavior Therapy, 24, 625–643.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rodebaugh, T.L., Chambless, D.L. The Effects of Video Feedback on Self-Perception of Performance: A Replication and Extension. Cognitive Therapy and Research 26, 629–644 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020357210137
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020357210137