Abstract
Grid-group cultural theory is applied to an empirical analysis of five debates on abortion in the Norwegian Parliament between 1992 and 1996. Policy arguments concerning selective abortion and abortion in general are compared. In the cultural–theoretical literature, restrictive policy arguments towards abortion have been connected to the hierarchical cultural bias, whereas permissive policy arguments have been associated with egalitarian and individualistic worldviews. The empirical analysis, however, shows that there are various different connections between abortion policy arguments and cultural biases. The possibly contradictory situation that arises when parties switch between cultural biases is discussed, and the article concludes that grid-group cultural theory proves useful in relating the various abortion policy arguments to broader worldviews that transcend this particular policy issue.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arter, David. (1999). Scandinavian Politics Today. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Bacchi, Carol Lee. (1999). Women, Policy and Politics: The Construction of Policy Problems. London: Sage.
Bale, Tim. (1999). “Broad Churches, Big Theory and One Small Example: Cultural Theory and Intraparty Politics.” In Michael Thompson, Gunnar Grendstad, and Per Selle (eds.), Cultural Theory as Political Science. London: Routledge.
Boyle, Richard and Richard Coughlin. (1994). “Conceptualising and Operationalising Cultural Theory.” In Dennis Coyle and Richard Ellis (eds.), Politics, Policy & Culture. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Casper, Monica. (1998). The Making of the Unborn Patient: A Social Anatomy of Fetal Surgery. London: Rutgers University Press.
Condit, Celeste Michelle. (1990). Decoding Abortion Rhetoric: Communicating Social Change. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Coyle, Dennis. (1994). “The Theory That Would Be King.” In Dennis Coyle and Richard Ellis (eds.), Politics, Policy & Culture. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Douglas, Mary. (1992). Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory. London: Routledge.
Ellis, Richard. (1993). American Political Cultures. New York: Oxford University Press.
Githens, Marianne and Dorothy McBride Stetson. (eds.). (1996). Abortion Politics: Public Policy in Cross-Cultural Perspective. New York: Routledge.
Grimen, Harald. (1999). “Sociocultural Functionalism.” In Michael Thompson, Gunnar Grendstad, and Per Selle (eds.), Cultural Theory as Political Science. London: Routledge.
Hoppe, Robert, and John Grin. (1999). “Pollution Through Traffic and Transport: The Praxis of Cultural Pluralism in Parliamentarian Technology Assessment.” In Michael Thompson, Gunnar Grendstad, and Per Selle (eds.), Cultural Theory as Political Science. London: Routledge.
Kulczycki, Andrzej. (1999). The Abortion Debate in the World Arena. London: Macmillan Press.
Lovenduski, Joni and Joyce Outshoorn (eds.). (1986). The New Politics of Abortion. London: Sage.
Luker, Kristin. (1984). Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Mensch, Elizabeth and Alan Freeman. (1993). The Politics of Virtue: Is Abortion Debatable? Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Newman, Karen. (1996). Fetal Positions: Individualism, Science, Visuality. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Olli, Eero. (1999). “Rejection of Cultural Biases and Effects on Party Preference.” In Michael Thompson, Gunnar Grendstad, and Per Selle (eds.), Cultural Theory as Political Science. London: Routledge.
Petchesky, Rosalind. (1987). “Foetal Images: the Power of Visual Culture in the Politics of Reproduction.” In Michelle Stanworth (ed.), Reproductive Technologies. Gender, Motherhood and Medicine. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Rudy, Kathy. (1996). Beyond Pro-Life and Pro-Choice: Moral Diversity in the Abortion Debate. Boston: Beacon Press.
Schwarz, Michiel and Michael Thompson. (1990). Divided We Stand: Redefining Politics, Technology and Social Choice. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Selle, Per. (1991). “Culture and the Study of Politics.” Scandinavian Political Studies 14, 97–124.
Thompson, Michael, Richard Ellis, and Aaron Wildavsky. (1990). Cultural Theory. Oxford: Westview Press.
Thompson, Michael and Steve Rayner. (1998). “Cultural Discourses.” In Steve Rayner and Elizabeth Malone (eds.), Human Choice and Climate Change, Vol. 1. London: Routledge, pp. 507–520.
Thompson, Michael, Gunnar Grendstad, and Per Selle. (1999). Cultural Theory as Political Science. London: Routledge.
Wildavsky, Aaron. (1991). The Rise of Radical Egalitarianism. Washington, DC: The American University Press.
OT. (1992). Parliamentary records. O.tid. (1991-1992), pp. 314–338.
ST. (1993). Parliamentary records. S.tid. (1992-1993), pp. 4346–4387.
OT. (1994). Parliamentary records. O.tid. (1993-1994), pp. 513–571.
ST. (1995): Parliamentary records. S.tid. (1994-1995), pp. 2535–2583.
ST. (1996): Parliamentary records. S.tid. (1995-1996), pp. 4138–4186. Dag Stenvoll is a research fellow at the Stein Rokkan Centre for Social Studies and a Ph.D. student at the Department of Comparative Politics, University of Bergen. He has published articles and a book (all in Norwegian) on Norwegian politics of abortion and reproductive technology. He is currently working on a dissertation (due in December 2002) on parliamentary discussions on sexuality and reproduction in Norway 1945-2001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stenvoll, D. Norwegian Politics of Abortion: Perspectives, Arguments, and Values. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 4, 287–304 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020354518437
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020354518437