Skip to main content
Log in

Linking For-Profit and Nonprofit Executive Compensation: Salary Composition and Incentive Structures in the U.S. Hospital Industry

  • Published:
Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research concerning executive compensation has a long history. However, most studies have been conducted on publicly traded investor-owned enterprises. Although the not-for-profit sector experienced explosive growth during the 1990s, little work has been devoted to understanding its executive compensation schemes and incentives arrangements. In the United States, recent Federal and State legislation has changed the landscape under which nonprofits must operate to avoid penalties for paying excessive compensation to its executives. Studies of compensation schemes under different organizational arrangements are limited. This paper uses the U.S. hospital industry to link the for-profit and nonprofit compensation and incentive literatures. It highlights selected for-profit executive compensation and incentive processes and suggests how some of these methods could be applied in a nonprofit setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • American College of Healthcare Executives (1993). Evaluating the Performance of the Hospital Executive in a Total Quality Management Environment, American College of Healthcare Executives, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • American College of Healthcare Executives (1995). Contracts for Healthcare Executives, American College of Healthcare Executives, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations in public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Econ. J. 100(401): 464-477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baber, W. R., Daniel, P. L., and Roberts, A. A. (2002). Compensation to Managers of Charitable Organizations: An Empirical Study of the Role of Accounting Measures of Program Activities. Account. Rev. 77(3): 679-693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barragato, C. A. (2002). The Impact of Accounting Regulation on Nonprofit Revenue Recognition. PhD dissertation, City University of New York-Baruch College, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogart, W. T. (1995). Accountability and nonprofit organizations: An economic perspective. Nonprofit Manag. Leadersh. 6: 157-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. J. Polit. Econ. 88: 288-307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S., and Boyd, B. K. (1998). How much does the CEO matter? The role of managerial discretion in the setting of CEO compensation. Acad. Manage. J. 41: 179-199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Mejia, L. R., and Wiseman, R. M. (1997). Reframing executive compensation: An assessment and outlook. J. Manage. 23: 291-374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, F. (1995). Reputation as collateral: An economic analysis of the role of trustees of nonprofits. Nonprofit Voluntary Sect. Q. 24(4): 293-305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, F., and Katz, E. (1998). The wage differential between nonprofit institutions and corporations: Getting more by paying less. J. Comp. Econ. 26: 246-261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, H. (1987). Economic theories of nonprofit institutions. In: The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, pp. 27-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, B. (1979). Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econ. 10: 74-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, B., and Milgrom, P. (1994). The firm as an incentive system. Am. Econ. Rev. 84: 972-991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Independent Sector (2001). The New Nonprofit Almanac in Brief, Independent Sector, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M., and Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financ. Econ. 3: 305-360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R., and Norton, D. (1992). The balanced scorecard—Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, January–February, 71-79.

  • Kershaw, R., and Kershaw, S. (2001). Developing a balanced scorecard to implement strategy at St. Elsewhere Hospital. Manage. Accounting Q. (Winter) 28-35.

  • Lambert, R. A., and Larcker, D. F. (1995). The prospective payment system, hospital efficiency, and compensation contracts for senior-level hospital administrators. J. Accounting Public Policy 14: 1-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, R. A., Larcker, D. F., and Verrechia, R. E. (1991). Portfolio considerations in valuing executive compensation. J. Accounting Res. 29(Spring): 129-149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. W., and Gupta, V. (1994). The performance paradox. Res. Organ. Behav. 16: 309-369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milstead, L. (1999). The pressure is on: Tying executive pay and community benefits. Health Forum J. 42(2): 47-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, G. T. (1999). Three Essays on the Agency Problem: CEO Compensation, Director Pay, and Proxy Disclosure Choices, PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. J. (1999). Executive Compensation, In: Orley Ashenfeltor and David Card (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 36, North Holland, chapter 38.

  • O'Neill, M. (1994). Philanthropic dimensions of mutual benefit organizations. Nonprofit Voluntary Sect. Q. 23: 3-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roomkin, M. J., and Weisbrod, B. A. (1998). Managerial compensation and incentives in for-profit and nonprofit hospitals. J. Law, Econ. Organ. 15(3): 750-781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, R. G. (1993). Accounting earnings and top executive compensation. J. Accounting Econ. 16: 55-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taussig, F. W., and Barker, W. S. (1925). American corporations and their executives: A statistical inquiry. Q. J. Econ. 3: 1-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Chronicle of Philanthropy (2001a). A challenge for the IRS, 13(21) August 23.

  • The Chronicle of Philanthropy (2001b). The right price, 13(24) October 4.

  • The Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Studies (1999). Global Civil Society: Dimensions of the Private Sector, The Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Studies, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress (1996). 104th Cong., 2nd Sess., P. L. 104-168, Taxpayer Bill of Rights 2. H. R. 2337.

  • Weisbrod, B. A. (1988). The Nonprofit Economy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1983). Organization form, residual claimants, and corporate control. J. Law Econ. 26(June): 351-366.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barragato, C.A. Linking For-Profit and Nonprofit Executive Compensation: Salary Composition and Incentive Structures in the U.S. Hospital Industry. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 13, 301–311 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020345627599

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020345627599

Navigation