Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of three methods to survey saproxylic beetles in hollow oaks

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the most endangered assemblages of species in Europe is insectsassociated with old trees. For that reason there is a need of developing methodsto survey this fauna. This study aims at comparing three methods – windowtrapping, pitfall trapping and wood mould sampling – to assess speciesrichness and composition of the saproxylic beetle fauna in living, hollow oaks.We have used these methods at the same site, and to a large extent in the sametrees. Useful information was obtained from all methods, but they partiallytarget different assemblages of species. Window trapping collected the highestnumber of species. Pitfall trapping collected beetles associated with treehollows which rarely are collected by window traps and therefore it isprofitable to combine these two methods. As wood mould sampling is the cheapestmethod to use, indicator species should preferably be chosen among specieswhich are efficiently collected with this method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antonsson K. and Wadstein M. 1991. Eklandskapet. En naturinventering av hagar och lovskögar i eklandskapet S. om Linköping. Länsstyrelsen i Östergötlands län, Linköping (in Swedish).

  • Baars M.A. 1979. Catches in pitfall traps in relation to mean densities of carabid beetles. Oecologia 41: 25–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biström O. and Väisänen R. 1988. Ancient-forest invertebrates of the Pyhän-Häkki national park in Central Finland. Acta Zoologica Fennica 185: 1–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dajoz R. 1980. Écologie des insectes forestièrs. Gauthier-Villars, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors U. (ed.) 2000. The 2000 Red List of Swedish Species. ArtDatabanken, Uppsala, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenslade P.J.M. 1964. Pitfall trapping as a method for studying populations of Carabidae (Coleoptera). Journal of Animal Ecology 33: 301–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond H.E.J. 1997. Arthropod biodiversity from Populus coarse woody material in north-central Alberta: a review of taxa and collection methods. Canadian Entomologist 129: 1009–1033.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding P.T. and Rose F. 1986. Pasture-Woodlands in Lowland Britain. A Review of Their Importance for Wildlife Conservation. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Huntingdon, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson N. and Lundberg S. 2000. —Skalbaggar i ihåliga ädellövträd – två nya arter för Sverige jämte återfynd av kortvingarna Hypnogyra glabra (Nordmann) och Meliceria tragardhi (Palm) [Beetles in hollow broadleaved deciduous tree – two species new to Sweden and the staphylinid beetles (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) Hypnogyra glabra and Meliceria tragardhi found again in Sweden] (in Swedish, English summary). Entomologisk Tidskrift 121: 93–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsell M. and Nordlander G. 1995. Field attraction of Coleoptera to odours of the wood-decaying polypores Fomitopsis pinicola and Fomes fomentarius. Annales Zoologici Fennici 32: 391–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaila L. 1993. A new method for collecting quantitative samples of insects associated with decaying wood or wood fungi. Entomologica Fennica 4: 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koponen S., RinneV. and Clayhills T. 1997. Arthropods on oaks branches in SW Finland, collected by a new trap type. Entomologica Fennica 8: 177–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs C.J. 1989. Ecological Methodology. Harper & Row Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg S. 1995. Catalogus Coleopterorum Sueciae. Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet, Stockholm, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martikainen P. 2002. Conservation of threatened saproxylic beetles: significance of retained aspen Populus tremula on clearcut areas. Ecological Bulletins 49: 205–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martikainen P., Siitonen J., Punttila P., Kaila L. and Rauh J. 2000. Species richness of Coleoptera in mature managed and old-growth forests in southern Finland. Biological Conservation 94: 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J., Halme E. and Haila Y. 1990. Balancing sampling effort in pitfall trapping of carabid beetles. Entomologica Fennica 1: 233–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson S.G. and Baranowski R. 1997. Habitat predictability and the occurrence of wood beetles in old-growth beech forests. Ecography 20: 491–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson S.G., Hedin J. and Niklasson M. 2001. Biodiversity and its assessment in boreal and nemoral forests. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research Supplement 3: 10–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Økland B. 1996. A comparison of three methods of trapping saproxylic beetles. European Journal of Entomology 93: p95–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palm T. 1959. DeDie Holz-und Rindenkäfer der Süd-und Mittelschwedischen Läubbaume [The wood and bark coleoptera of deciduous trees in southern and central Sweden] (in German, English summary). Opuscula Entomologica Supplementum XVI: 1–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranius T. 2000. Minimum viable metapopulation size of a beetle, Osmoderma eremita, living in tree hollows. Animal Conservation 3: 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranius T. 2001. Constancy and asynchrony of populations of a beetle, Osmoderma eremita living in tree hollows. Oecologia 126: 208–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranius T. 2002. Influence of stand size and quality of tree hollows on saproxylic beetles in Sweden. Biological Conservation 103: 85–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranius T. and Jansson N. 2000. The influence of forest regrowth, original canopy cover and tree size on saproxylic beetles associated with old oaks. Biological Conservation 95: 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranius T. and Nilsson S.G. 1997. Habitat of Osmoderma eremita Scop. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), a beetle living in hollow trees. Journal of Insect Conservation 1: 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranius T., Antonsson K., Jansson N. and Johannesson J. 2001. Inventering och skötsel av gamla ekar i Eklandskapet söder om Linköping [Inventories and management of old oaks in an area south of Linköping, Sweden] (in Swedish, English summary). Fauna och Flora 96: 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rundlöf U. and Nilsson S.G. 1995. Fem Ess metoden. Naturskyddsföreningen, Stockholm (in Swedish).

  • Siitonen J. and Saaristo L. 2000. Habitat requirements and conservation of Pytho kolwensis, a beetle species of old-growth boreal forest. Biological Conservation 94: 211–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speight M.C.D. 1989. Saproxylic Invertebrates and Their Conservation. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence J.R. and Niemelä J.K. 1994. Sampling carabid assemblages with pitfall traps: the madness and the method. Canadian Entomologist 126: 881–894.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ranius, T., Jansson, N. A comparison of three methods to survey saproxylic beetles in hollow oaks. Biodiversity and Conservation 11, 1759–1771 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020343030085

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020343030085

Navigation