Skip to main content
Log in

Allogrooming Behavior and Grooming Site Preferences in Captive Bonobos (Pan paniscus): Association with Female Dominance

  • Published:
International Journal of Primatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I tested the utility of Seyfarth's (1977) model of rank-related attractiveness to explain the distribution of allogrooming behavior among captive bonobos (Pan paniscus). Adult female bonobos generally have high social status and may be dominant over males. As predicted by the model, I found that high-ranking adult females received most allogrooming within each of the four investigated groups. Among adult female-adult female dyads, however, allogrooming was not clearly associated with dominance rank. Contradictory to predictions of the model, the highest-ranking females were responsible for most displacements over allogrooming, and grooming competition is positively correlated with dominance rank. In the second part of this study, I investigated the social significance of allogrooming body site preferences. Bonobos direct significantly most allogrooming to the face of conspecifics, and high- and low-ranking individuals, as well as males and females, differ significantly in their preferences for certain allogrooming sites. Subordinates and males tended to avoid facial grooming and preferred the back and anogenital region, while high-ranking individuals and females directed most allogrooming to the face and head of grooming partners. Data from this study support the hypothesis that high-ranking females are the most attractive grooming partners within a female-centered bonobo society. Many other aspects of allogrooming behavior, however, are not consistent with the model of rank-related attractiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alexander R. (1974). The evolution of social behavior. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5: 325–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altmann S. A. (1974). Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49: 227–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applebye M. C. (1983). The probability of linearity in hierarchies. Anim. Behav. 31: 600–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badrian A. and Badrian N. (1984). Social organization of Pan paniscus in the Lomako Forest, Zaire. In Susman R. L. (ed.), The Pygmy Chimpanzee: Evolutionary Biology and Behavior. Plenum, New York, pp. 325–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey R. C. and Aunger R. (1990). Human as primates: the social relationships of Efe Pygmy men in comparative perspective. Int. J. Primatol. 11(2): 127–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker K. C. and Smuts B. B. (1994). Social relationships of female chimpanzees: diversity between captive social groups. In Wrangham R. W. et al. (eds.), Chimpanzee Cultures. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 227–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton R. (1985). Grooming site preference in primates and their functional implications. Int. J. Primatol. 6(5): 519–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boccia M. L. (1983). A functional analysis of social grooming patterns through direct comparison with self-grooming in Rhesus monkeys. Int. J. Primatol. 4(4): 399–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boccia M. L. (1989). Comparison of the physical characteristics of grooming in two species of macaques (Macaca nemestrina and M. radiata). J. Comp. Psychol. 103: 177–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boccia M. L. et al. (1982). The influence of behavioural context and social characteristics on the physical aspects of social grooming in rhesus monkeys. Int. J. Primatol. 3: 91–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borries C. (1992). Grooming site preferences in female langurs (Presbytis entellus). Int. J. Primatol. 13: 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borries C. et al. (1994). Weaving a tight social net: allogrooming in free-ranging female langurs (Presbytis entellus). Int. J. Primatol. 15(3): 421–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boziz J. and Valentincic T. (1995). Quantitative analysis of social grooming behavior of the honey-bee Apis mellifera carnica. Apidiologie 26(2): 141–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney D. L. (1992). Intragroup cohesion and intergroup hostility: the relation between grooming distributions and intergroup competition among female primates. Behav. Ecol. 3(4): 334–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelho A. M. et al. (1983). Allogrooming and social status: an assessment of the contributions of female behavior to the social organization of hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas). Primates 24(2): 184–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drews C. (1993). The concept and definition of dominance in animal behaviour. Behaviour 125(3–4): 283–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar R. I. M. (1991). Functional significance of social grooming in primates. Folia Primatol. 57: 121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbanks L. A. (1980). Relationships among adult females in captive vervet monkeys: testing a model of rank-related attractiveness. Anim. Behav. 28: 853–859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furuichi T. (1989). Social interactions and the life history of female Pan paniscus in Wamba, Zaire. Int. J. Primatol. 10(3): 173–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furuichi T. (1997). Agonistic Interactions and matrifocal dominance rank of wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba. Int. J. Primatol. 18(6): 855–975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furuichi T. and Ihobe H. (1994). Variation in male relationships in bonobos and chimpanzees. Behaviour 130(3–4): 211–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall J. (1968). Behaviour of free-living chimpanzees of the Gombe Stream area. Anim. Behav. Monogr. 1: 163–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall J. (1986). The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of behavior. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goosen C. (1981). On the function of allogrooming in Old-World Monkeys. In Chiarelli A. B. and Corrucini R. S. (eds.), Primate behaviour and Sociobiology. Springer, Berlin, pp. 110–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goosen C. (1987). Social grooming in primates. In Mitchell G. and Erwin J. (eds.), Comparative Primate Biology, Vol. 2, Part B: Behavior, Cognition and Motivation. Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 107–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemelrijk C. K. (1990). Models of and tests for reciprocity, unidirectionality and other social interaction patterns at group level. Anim. Behav. 39: 1013–1029.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemelrijk C. K. and Ek A. (1991). Reciprocity and interchange of grooming and “support” in captive chimpanzees. Anim. Behav. 41: 923–935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemelrijk C. K. et al. (1992). Sexual exchange relationships in captive chimpanzees? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 30: 269–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohmann G. and Fruth B. (1993). Field observations on meat sharing among bonobos (Pan paniscus). Folia Primatol. 60: 225–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins M. and Barash D. P. (1976). Grooming in Primates: Implications for its utalitarian function. Primates 17(2): 145–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idani G. (1991). Social relationships between immigrant and resident bonobo (Pan paniscus) females at Wamba. Folia Primatol. 57: 83–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihobe H. (1992). Male-male relationships among wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba, Republic of Zaire. Primates 33(2): 163–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kano T. (1980). Social behavior of wild Pygmy Chimpanzees (Pan paniscus) of Wamba: a preliminary report. J. Hum. Evol. 9: 243–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kano T. (1992). The last Ape: Pygmy Chimpanzee behavior and ecology. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • King N. E. et al. (1980). Social behavior in a captive chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) group. Primates 21: 198–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krusko, N. A. (1990). Social Behavior, Reproduction and Aging in Captive Female Langur Monkeys, Ph.D. thesis, Berkeley, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuroda S. (1979). Grouping of the pygmy chimpanzees. Primates 20: 161–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martell F. L. et al. (1994). The social grooming of captive female Rhesus monkeys: Effects of the birth of their infants. Int. J. Primatol. 5(4): 555–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin P. and Bateson P. (1993). Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory guide, 2nd Edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna J. J. (1978). Biosocial functions of grooming among the common Indian langur monkey (Presbytis entellus). Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 48: 503–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser R. et al. (1991). Social influence on grooming site preferences among captive long-tailed macaques. Int. J. Primatol. 12(3): 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muroyama Y. and Sugiyama Y. (1994). Grooming relationships in two species of chimpanzees. In Wrangham R. W. et al. (eds.), Chimpanzee Cultures. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 169–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwenhuijsen K. and de Waal F. B. M. (1982). Effects of spatial crowding on social behavior in a chimpanzee colony. Zoo Biol. 1: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishida T. (1979). The social structure of chimpanzees of the Mahale mountains. In Hamburg D. A. and McCown E. R., The Great Apes. The Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishida T. (1983). Alpha status and agonistic alliance in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii). Primates 24: 318–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noë, R. et al. (1980). Types of dominance in a chimpanzee colony. Folia Primatol. 34: 90–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obierski I. M. (1994). A method for the analysis of grooming reciprocation at the dyadic level. In Roeder J. J. et al. (eds.), Current Primatology Vol. II. Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, pp. 175–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien T. G. (1993). Allogrooming behaviour among wedge-capped capuchin monkeys. Anim. Behav. 46: 499–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parish A. R. (1992). Bonobos fish for sweets: the female sex-for-food connection. Abstracts, XIVth Congr. Int. Primatol. Soc., Strasbourg, France, p. 202.

  • Parish A. R. (1994). Sex and food control in the “uncommon chimpanzee”: How bonobo females overcome a phylogenetic legacy of male dominance. Ethol. Sociobiol. 15: 157–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parish A. R. (1996). Female relationships in Bonobos (Pan paniscus). Human Nature 7(1): 61–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parr L. A. et al. (1997). Grooming down the hierarchy: allogrooming in captive brown capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella. Anim. Behav. 54, 361–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Puijenbroeck B. (1993). Studbook of the bonobo. Pan paniscus Schwarz. Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp.

  • Pusey A. E. (1979). Intercommunity transfer of chimpanzees in Gombe National Park. In Hamburg D. A., McCown E. R. (eds.), The Great Apes. Menlo Park, California, Benjamin/Cummings, pp. 465–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusey A. E. (1990). Behavioural changes at adolescence in chimpanzees. Behaviour 115(3–4): 203–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichard U. and Sommer V. (1994). Grooming site preferences in wild white-handed Gibbons (Hylobates lar). Primates 35(3): 369–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riss D. C. and Busse C. D. (1977). Fifty-day observation of a free-ranging adult male chimpanzee. Folia Primatol. 28: 283–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sade D. S. (1965). Some aspects of parent-offspring and sibling relations in a group of rhesus monkeys, with a discussion of grooming. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 23: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik C. P. (1989). The ecology of social relationships amongst female primates. In Standen, V. and Foley R. A. (eds.), Comparative Socioecology. Blackwell Sc. Publ., Oxford, pp. 195–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth R. M. (1977). A model of social grooming among adult female vervet monkeys. J. Theor. Biol. 65: 671–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth R. M. (1980). The distribution of grooming and related behaviours among female vervet monkeys. Anim. Behav. 28: 798–813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth R. M. and Cheney D.L. (1984). Grooming, alliances and reciprocal altruism in vervet monkeys. Nature 308: 541–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson M. J. A. (1973). Social grooming of male chimpanzees. In Michael R. P. and Crook J. H. (eds.), Comparative ecology and behaviour of primates.

  • Smuts B. B. (1985). Sex and friendship in baboons. Aldine de Gruyter, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal R. R. and Rohlf F. J. (1987). Biometry, 2nd Edition. Freeman and Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, J. (1967). Allogrooming in primates: a review. In Morris D. (ed.), Primate Ethology. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London, pp. 148–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugiyama Y. (1988). Grooming interactions among adult male chimpanzees at Bossou, Guinea, with special reference to social structure. Int. J. Primatol. 9: 393–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugiyama Y. and Koman J. (1979). Social structure and dynamics of wild chimpanzees at Bossou, Guinea. Primates 20(3), 323–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strushaker T. T. and Leland L. (1987). Infanitizide by adult males. In Smuts B. B., Cheney D. L., Seyfarth R. M., Wrangham R. W. and Struhsaker, T. T. (eds.); Primate Societies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 306–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry R. L. (1970). Primate grooming as a tension reduction mechanism. J. Psychol. 76: 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen N. (1954). Courtship and threat display. Ibis 96: 233–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vervaecke H. et al. (1992). Female clustering as a feeding defense strategy in bonobos (Pan paniscus). Abstracts, XIVth Congr. Int. Primatol. Soc., Strasbourg, France, p. 272.

  • de Waal F. B. M. (1982). Chimpanzee politics. New York, Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal F. B. M. (1988). The communicative repertoire of captive bonobos (Pan paniscus), compared to that of chimpanzees. Behaviour 106: 183–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal F. B. M. (1994). Chimpanzee's adaptive potential: a comparison of social life under captive and wild conditions. In Wrangham R. W. et al. (eds.), Chimpanzee Cultures. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 243–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal F. B. M. and van Roosmalen A. (1979). Reconciliation and consolation among chimpanzees. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 5: 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal F. B. M. and Lutrell L. (1985). The formal hierarchy of rhesus monkeys: an investigation of the bared-teeth display. Am. J. Primatol. 9: 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis J. (1992). Chimpanzee genital swelling and its role in the pattern of sociosexual behavior. Am. J. Primatol. 28: 101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters J. R. and Seyfarth R. M. (1987). Conflict and cooperation. In Smuts B. B., Cheney D. L., Seyfarth R. M., Wrangham R. W. and Struhsaker, T. T. (eds.), Primate Societies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 306–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts D. P. and Pusey A. E. (1993). Behavior of juvenile and adolescent Great Apes. In Pereira M. E. and Fairbanks L. A. (eds.), Juvenile Primates: Life History, Development and Behaviour. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 148–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • White F. J. (1992a). Activity budgets, feeding behavior, and habitat use of Pygmy Chimpanzees at Lomako, Zaire. Am. J. Primatol. 26: 215–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • White F. J. (1992b). Pygmy chimpanzee social organization: variation with party size and between study sites. Am. J. Primatol. 26: 203–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham R. W. (1980). An ecological model of female-bonded primate groups. Behaviour 75: 262–300.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franz, C. Allogrooming Behavior and Grooming Site Preferences in Captive Bonobos (Pan paniscus): Association with Female Dominance. International Journal of Primatology 20, 525–546 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020338706800

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020338706800

Navigation