Skip to main content
Log in

How can there be paradigms?

  • Published:
Neohelicon Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study undertakes to explain the kuhnian notion of paradigm, in order to work out the methodological frame of re-construction of the theory of literature. It introduces the notion of legitimising community, which, according to the study"s claims, plays a determining role in assigning a theory the status of paradigm. It differentiates the notions of strong and weak paradigm, and supports the former because it considers that the "sociological turn" of the theory of science can only occur by asserting the strong notion of paradigm. Using this theoretical frame, the study seeks an answer to the question whether Siegfried J. Schmidt"s 1983 introduction of the empirical science of literature as a new paradigm was legitimate or not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

BIBLIOGRAPHY

  • Diederich, W. 1981. Strukturalistische Rekonstruktionen. Braunschweig-Wiesbaden: Vieweg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finke, P. 1981. A Sketch of Constructive Functionalism. Poetics, 10, no. 4/5. 337-355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finke, P. 1982. Konstruktiver Funktionalismus. Die wissenschaftliche Basis einer empirischen Theorie der Literatur. (Konzeption Empirische Literaturwissenschaft Bd. II.) Braunschweig-Wiesbaden: Vieweg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finke, P. 1985. Empirizität allein genügt nicht. Kritische Ñberlegungen zu Konzeptionen empirischer Wissenschaft. Spiel, 4. 71-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Th. S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Th. S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markiewicz, H. 1966. Az irodalomtudomány fõ kérdései. (The Main Issues of Literary Criticism.) Budapest: Gondolat (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Odorics, F. 1988. Towards the Constructivist Science of Literature (a new paradigm?) Empirical Studies of the Arts, Vol. 7 (2), 1989 145-161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, S. J. 1980a Grundriß der empirischen Literaturwissenschaft. Bd. 1: Der gesellschaftliche Handlungsbereich Literatur. Braunschweig-Wiesbaden: Vieweg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, S. J. 1981. Empirical Studies in Literature: Introductory Remarks. Poetics, 1981/4-5. 317-336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, S. J. 1982a Die Empirische Literaturwissenschaft ELW: Ein neues Paradigma. Merkur, Heft 4. 356-366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, S. J. 1982b Grundriß der empirischen Literaturwissenschaft. Bd. 2: Zur Rekonstruktion literaturwissenschaftlicher Fragestellungen in einer Empirischen Theorie der Literatur. Braunschweig-Wiesbaden: Vieweg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, S. J. 1983. The Empirical Science of Literature ESL: a New Paradigm. Poetics, 12. 19-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneed, J. D. 1976. Philosophical Problems in the Empirical Science of Science:A Formal Approach. Erkenntnis 10. 115-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W. 1979. The Structuralist View of Theories. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Odorics, F. How can there be paradigms?. Neohelicon 29, 117–138 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020334223343

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020334223343

Keywords

Navigation