Skip to main content
Log in

So Many Hardballs, So Few Over the Plate

  • Discussion
  • Published:
Computers and the Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fosterss critique of our work is overdrawn, has left our findings 99.9% intact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Crain, C. “The Bard s Fingerprints”. LinguaFranca, July/August (1998), p. 29.

  • Elliott, W. and R. Valenza. “And Then There Were None”. CHum, 30 (1996/1997), p. 191. “Glass Slippers and Seven-League Boots”. Sh. Q., 48 (1997), p. 177. “The Professor Doth Protest Too Much, Methinks”. CHum, 32 (1998/1999), p. 435. “So Much Hardball” [see Note 1], 2000. “Smoking Guns and Silver Bullets: Could John Ford Have Written the Funeral Elegy?”, LLC, 16 (2001), p. 205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, D. “Elegy” by W.S.: A Study in Attribution. Cranbury, NJ: Associated University Presses, 1989. “A Funeral Elegy”. PMLA, 111 (1996), p. 1082. “Response to Elliott and Valenza”. CHum, 30 (1996a), p. 247. “The Claremont Shakespeare Authorship Clinic”. CHum, 32 (1998/1999), p. 491. Author Unknown. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monsarrat, G. “A Funeral Elegy: Ford,W.S. and Shakespeare”. Review of English Studies, 53 (2002), p. 186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, B. Counterfeiting Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elliott, W.E., Valenza, R.J. So Many Hardballs, So Few Over the Plate. Computers and the Humanities 36, 455–460 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020288124446

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020288124446

Navigation