Skip to main content
Log in

Women in a Male-Dominated Industry: Factor Analysis of a Women Workplace Culture Questionnaire Based on a Grounded Theory Model

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Women Workplace Culture Questionnaire (WWQ) was developed based on results from a grounded theory study. Respondents were asked: (1) to compare women's general status at work with that of men and (2) to describe their specific experiences in this regard. Answers from 104 White women working in a male-dominated industry were intercorrelated and subjected to principal component analyses, as well as a to varimax rotation. A five-factor solution that explained 56.5% of the total variance was supported by a graphic scree-test. Three factors with coefficient alpha >.70 were identified that concerned areas of perceived burdens on me (the individual woman), perceived burdens on women, and sexual harassment. A fourth factor, social support, also showed modest reliability. Factors I, II, and IV correlated significantly with ill health, distress, and job satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Acker, J. (1996, September). Gender and work: Does difference make a difference? Key-note address presented at the 25th International Congress on Occupational Health (ICOH), Stockholm, Sweden.

  • Bergman, B., Carlsson, S. G., & Wright, I. (1996). Women's work experiences and health in a male-dominated industry: A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 38, 663-672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, B., & Hallberg, L. R.-M. (1997). Swedish women in a male-dominated industry: A qualitative study of gender related problems. Journal of Gender, Culture, and Health, 1, 45-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassel, C. M., & Walsh, S. (1997). Organizational cultures, gender management strategies, and women's experience of work. Feminism and Psychology, 2, 224-230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, M., & Cooper, C. (1992). Shattering the glass ceiling: The woman manager. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekenvall, L., H & ärenstam, A., Karlqvist, L., Nise, G., & Vingård, E. (1993). Kvinnan i den vetenskapliga studien—finns hon? [The woman in the scientific study—does she exist?] Lakartidningen, 90(43), 3773-3774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenhaeuser, M. (1996). Stress and gender. European Review, 4, 313-327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenhaeuser, M., Lundberg, U., Fredrikson, M., Melin, B., Tuomisto, M., Myrsten, et al. (1989). Stress on and off the job as related to sex and occupational status in white-collar workers. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 10, 321-346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallant, S. J., Coons, H. L., & Morokoff, P. J. (1994). Psychology and women's health: Some reflections and future directions. In V. J. Adesso, D. M. Reddy, & R. Fleming (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on women's health (pp. 315-346). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. M. (1990). Women's work: An inquiry into the health effects of invisible and visible labor. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karasek, R. A., & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work: Stress, productivity and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, G., & Oestergren, P.-O. (2000). Common symptoms in middle aged women: Their relation to employment status, psychosocial work conditions and social support in a Swedish setting. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 54, 192-199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, U., Mårdberg, B., & Frankenhaeuser, M. (1994). The total workload of male and female white-collar workers as related to age, occupational level, and number of children. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 4, 315-327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E. (1991). Gender segregation in the workplace: Continuities and discontinuities from childhood to adulthood: In M. Frankenhaeuser, U. Lundberg, & M. Chesney (Eds.), Women, work, and health: Stress and opportunities (pp. 3-16). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orth-Gomer, K. (1998). Psychosocial risk factor profile in women with coronary heart disease. In M. Chesney & K. Orth-Gomer (Eds.), Women, stress, and heart disease (pp. 25-38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piotrkowski, C. (1998). Gender harassment, job satisfaction and distress among employed White and minority women. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3, 33-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, S. (1996). Education and the “woman question.” Canadian Psychology, 38, 154-163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repetti, R. L., Matthews, K. A., & Waldron, I. (1989). Employment and women's health: Effects of paid employment on women's. mental and physical health. American Psychologist, 11, 1394-1401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, I., Bender, M. P., & Finns, S. J. (1997). Sexual harassment in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25, 163-169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymor, E. (1999). The role of socialization in shaping the career-related choices of undergraduate women in science, mathematics and engineering majors. In C. Selby (Ed.), Women in science and engineering: Choices for success (pp. 118-126). New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starrin, B. (1996). Grounded theory—en modell för kvalitativ analys [Grounded theory-A model for qualitative analysis]. In P. G. Svensson & B. Starrin (Eds.), Kvalitativa studier i teori och praktik (pp. 121-193). Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Yearbook of Sweden. (2000).Women and men in Sweden: Facts and figures 2000. Stockholm, Sweden: Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. N. (1980). Grounded theory methodology: Its issues and processes. Image, 12, 20-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallin, L., & Wright, I. (1986). Psychosocial aspects of the work environment: A group approach. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 28, 384-393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikman, A. (1991). Developing social indicators: An “effort” with the survey method illustrated with the example of working environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stockholm University, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bergman, B., Hallberg, L.RM. Women in a Male-Dominated Industry: Factor Analysis of a Women Workplace Culture Questionnaire Based on a Grounded Theory Model. Sex Roles 46, 311–322 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020276529726

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020276529726

Navigation