Abstract
A Women Workplace Culture Questionnaire (WWQ) was developed based on results from a grounded theory study. Respondents were asked: (1) to compare women's general status at work with that of men and (2) to describe their specific experiences in this regard. Answers from 104 White women working in a male-dominated industry were intercorrelated and subjected to principal component analyses, as well as a to varimax rotation. A five-factor solution that explained 56.5% of the total variance was supported by a graphic scree-test. Three factors with coefficient alpha >.70 were identified that concerned areas of perceived burdens on me (the individual woman), perceived burdens on women, and sexual harassment. A fourth factor, social support, also showed modest reliability. Factors I, II, and IV correlated significantly with ill health, distress, and job satisfaction.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Acker, J. (1996, September). Gender and work: Does difference make a difference? Key-note address presented at the 25th International Congress on Occupational Health (ICOH), Stockholm, Sweden.
Bergman, B., Carlsson, S. G., & Wright, I. (1996). Women's work experiences and health in a male-dominated industry: A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 38, 663-672.
Bergman, B., & Hallberg, L. R.-M. (1997). Swedish women in a male-dominated industry: A qualitative study of gender related problems. Journal of Gender, Culture, and Health, 1, 45-63.
Cassel, C. M., & Walsh, S. (1997). Organizational cultures, gender management strategies, and women's experience of work. Feminism and Psychology, 2, 224-230.
Davidson, M., & Cooper, C. (1992). Shattering the glass ceiling: The woman manager. London: Paul Chapman.
Ekenvall, L., H & ärenstam, A., Karlqvist, L., Nise, G., & Vingård, E. (1993). Kvinnan i den vetenskapliga studien—finns hon? [The woman in the scientific study—does she exist?] Lakartidningen, 90(43), 3773-3774.
Frankenhaeuser, M. (1996). Stress and gender. European Review, 4, 313-327.
Frankenhaeuser, M., Lundberg, U., Fredrikson, M., Melin, B., Tuomisto, M., Myrsten, et al. (1989). Stress on and off the job as related to sex and occupational status in white-collar workers. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 10, 321-346.
Gallant, S. J., Coons, H. L., & Morokoff, P. J. (1994). Psychology and women's health: Some reflections and future directions. In V. J. Adesso, D. M. Reddy, & R. Fleming (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on women's health (pp. 315-346). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Hall, E. M. (1990). Women's work: An inquiry into the health effects of invisible and visible labor. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Karasek, R. A., & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work: Stress, productivity and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books.
Krantz, G., & Oestergren, P.-O. (2000). Common symptoms in middle aged women: Their relation to employment status, psychosocial work conditions and social support in a Swedish setting. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 54, 192-199.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.
Lundberg, U., Mårdberg, B., & Frankenhaeuser, M. (1994). The total workload of male and female white-collar workers as related to age, occupational level, and number of children. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 4, 315-327.
Maccoby, E. E. (1991). Gender segregation in the workplace: Continuities and discontinuities from childhood to adulthood: In M. Frankenhaeuser, U. Lundberg, & M. Chesney (Eds.), Women, work, and health: Stress and opportunities (pp. 3-16). New York: Plenum.
Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Orth-Gomer, K. (1998). Psychosocial risk factor profile in women with coronary heart disease. In M. Chesney & K. Orth-Gomer (Eds.), Women, stress, and heart disease (pp. 25-38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Piotrkowski, C. (1998). Gender harassment, job satisfaction and distress among employed White and minority women. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3, 33-43.
Pyke, S. (1996). Education and the “woman question.” Canadian Psychology, 38, 154-163.
Repetti, R. L., Matthews, K. A., & Waldron, I. (1989). Employment and women's health: Effects of paid employment on women's. mental and physical health. American Psychologist, 11, 1394-1401.
Robbins, I., Bender, M. P., & Finns, S. J. (1997). Sexual harassment in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25, 163-169.
Seymor, E. (1999). The role of socialization in shaping the career-related choices of undergraduate women in science, mathematics and engineering majors. In C. Selby (Ed.), Women in science and engineering: Choices for success (pp. 118-126). New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
Starrin, B. (1996). Grounded theory—en modell för kvalitativ analys [Grounded theory-A model for qualitative analysis]. In P. G. Svensson & B. Starrin (Eds.), Kvalitativa studier i teori och praktik (pp. 121-193). Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
Statistical Yearbook of Sweden. (2000).Women and men in Sweden: Facts and figures 2000. Stockholm, Sweden: Statistics.
Stern, P. N. (1980). Grounded theory methodology: Its issues and processes. Image, 12, 20-23.
Wallin, L., & Wright, I. (1986). Psychosocial aspects of the work environment: A group approach. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 28, 384-393.
Wikman, A. (1991). Developing social indicators: An “effort” with the survey method illustrated with the example of working environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stockholm University, Sweden.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bergman, B., Hallberg, L.RM. Women in a Male-Dominated Industry: Factor Analysis of a Women Workplace Culture Questionnaire Based on a Grounded Theory Model. Sex Roles 46, 311–322 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020276529726
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020276529726