Skip to main content
Log in

The Collection of PM10 for Toxicological Investigation: Comparisons between Different Collecting Devices

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A positive correlation has been established between increased levels of airborne particulate pollution and adverse health effects, the toxicological mechanisms of which are poorly understood. For toxicologists to unambiguously determine thesemechanisms, truly representative samples of ambient PM10 are required. This presents problems, as PM10 collecting equipment commonly employed, such as the Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance (TEOM®), heat the inflow toexclude moisture or use fibrous filters, resulting in a PM10sample that may have undergone significant chemical change on thefilter surface or is contaminated by filter fibres. Other systems(i.e. Negretti and Partisol) can successfully collect PM10 without chemical alteration or filter contamination. Comparativecollections from Port Talbot, S. Wales suggest that TEOMs and Negretti/Partisol systems collect different PM10's; the principle difference arising from the TEOM's heating chamber, which precipitates water-soluble ions and volatilises some organic components. This results in both the mass and compositionof the PM10's being altered. Particle size distributionsfor Negretti and Partisol collections highlighted differences mainly attributed to different flow rates. The results of thiswork demonstrate that simple correlations between PM10 massand adverse health effects are problematic. Furthermore, elucidation of the complex fractionation and chemical changes indifferent collectors is necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  • Allen, G., Sioutas, C., Koutrakis, P., Reiss, R., Lurmann, F. W. and Roberts, P. T.: 1997, ‘Evaluation of the TEOM method for measurement of ambient particulate mass in urban areas’, J. Air Waste Mgmt. Assoc. 47, 682–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • BéruBé, K. A., Jones, T. P. and Williamson, B. J.: 1997, ‘Electron microscopy of urban airborne particulate matter’, Microscopy Anal., 11–13.

  • BéruBé, K. A., Jones, T. P., Williamson, B. J. and Richards, R. J.: 1999, ‘The Physicochemical Characterisation of Urban Airborne Particulate Matter’, in R. L. Maynard and C. V. Howard (eds), Particulate Matter BIOS Scientific Publishers, U.K., Ch. 4, pp. 39–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunekreef, B., Hoek, G., Fischer, P. and Spieksma, F. T. M.: 2000, ‘Relation between airborne pollen concentrations and daily cardiovascular and respiratory-disease mortality’, Lancet 355, 1517–1518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M. J. and Tobias, A.: 2000, ‘Causality and temporality in the study of short-term health effects of air pollution on health’, Int. J. Epidem. 29, 271–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. (Helen.Clark@aeat.co.uk): 1996, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions ‘www.AEAT.co.uk/netcen/airqual'.

  • Department of Health: 1998, Quantification of the Effects of Air Pollution on Health in Great Britain, Chairman: Holgate ST, The Stationery Office, U.K., pp. 18–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, J., Adler, K. B., Richards, J. H. and Dreher, K. L.: 1997, ‘Epithelial injury induced by exposure to residual oil fly-ash particles: Role of reactive oxygen species?’, Am. J. Resp. Cell Molec. Biol. 17(5), 625–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Register: 1990, ‘Ambient air monitoring reference and equivalent methods designation’, R & P Series 1400 TEOM Monitor 55, 43406–43407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavett, S. H., Madison, S. L., Stevens, M. A. and Costa, D. L.: 1999, ‘Residual oil fly-ash amplifies allergic cytokines, airway responsiveness and inflammation in mice’, Am. J. Resp. Crit. Care Med. 160(6), 1897–1904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D.: 2000, ‘Evaluation of TEOM Correction Factors for Assessing the EU Stage 1 Limit Values for PM10’, ETI Group Ltd. 3rd Particulate Group Meeting, Cheltenham, CRE Group Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. P., Williamson, B. J., BéruBé, K. A. and Richards, R. J.: 2001 ‘Microscopy and chemistry of particles collected on TEOM filters: Swansea, South Wales 1998¶1999’, Atmos. Env. 35, 3573–3583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadiiska, M. B., Mason, R. P., Dreher, K. L., Costa, D. L. and Ghio, A. J.: 1997, ‘In vivo evidence of free radical formation in the rat lung after exposure to an emission source air pollution particle’, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 10, 1104–1108.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A.: 2000, ‘TEOM and the Volatility of U.K. Non-Urban PM10 Particulate Matter: A Regulatory Dilemma?’ ETI group Ltd. 3rd Particulate Group Meeting, Cheltenham, CRE Group Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, X. Y., Gilmour, P. S., Donaldson, K. and MacNee, W.: 1996, ‘Free radical activity and proinflammatory effects of particulate air pollution (PM10) in vivo and in vitro’, Thorax 51, 1216–1222

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. B., Rupprecht, E. and Patashnick, H.: 1995, ‘Considerations for the Sampling and Measurement of Ambient Particulate Mass’, Pres. at Particulate Matter: Health and Regulatory Issues, Pittsburgh, pp. 1–8.

  • Mille, M. and Pooley, F. D.: 1999, ‘Examination of Directional PM10 Samples Collected at the Port Talbot Area’, Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council, Res. Report 2, pp. 8–17, pp. 29¶37.

  • Pope 3rd, C. A., Thun, M. J., Namboodiri, M. M., Dockery, D. W., Evans, J. S., Speizer, F. E. and Heath Jr., C.W.: 1995. ‘Particulate air pollution as a predictor of mortality in a prospective study of U.S. adults’ Am. J. Respir. Crit. CareMed. 151, 669–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. J.: 1997, ‘Small particles, big problems’, Biologist 44(1), 249–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. J., BéruBé, K. A., Masek, L., Symons, D. and Murphy, S. A.: 1999, ‘The Biological Effects on Lung Epithelium of Well-characterised Fine Particles’, in R. L. Maynard and C. V. Howard (eds), Particulate Matter, BIOS Scientific Publishers, U.K. Ch. 7, pp. 97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupprecht and Patashnick Co., Inc.: 1992, Theory, Calibration and Precision of the TEOM Series 1400 Monitor, pp. 1–10.

  • Rupprecht and Patashnick Co., Inc.: 1995, ‘Total particulate and size-selective sampling’, TEOM Series 1200/1400 Tech. Note 3, pp. 1–6.

  • Schwartz, J.: 2000, ‘The distributed lag between air pollution and daily deaths’, Epidemiology 11, 320–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J. and Meas, L.M.: 2000, ‘Fine particles are more strongly associated than coarse particles with acute respiratory health effects in schoolchildren’, Epidemiology 11, 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souter, A., Watt, M., Cherrie, J. W. and Seaton, A.: 1999, ‘Comparison between a personal PM10 sampling head and the tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM) system’, Atmos. Env. 33, 4373–4377.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leona L. Greenwell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greenwell, L.L., Jones, T.P. & Richards, R.J. The Collection of PM10 for Toxicological Investigation: Comparisons between Different Collecting Devices. Environ Monit Assess 79, 251–273 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020230727359

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020230727359

Navigation