Advertisement

Euphytica

, Volume 127, Issue 2, pp 261–273 | Cite as

Genetic studies of selection criteria for productive and stable peas

  • Virginie Bourion
  • Guy Fouilloux
  • Christine Le Signor
  • Isabelle Lejeune-Hénaut
Article

Abstract

In this study we investigated the genetic determinism of criteria suitable for breeding for seed yield and yield stability in dry pea (Pisum sativumL.) using a diallel cross involving eight genotypes. Seven criteria related to plant and seed development were evaluated including: onset of flowering, node of first flower, leaf appearance rate, rate of progression of flowering, number of podded nodes on the main stem, mean dry seed weight per podded node and number of basal branches per plant. Most of these traits measured are related to timing of seed set and are thought to be critical in determining yield stability. We combined different diallel analyses (Hayman,1954; Griffing, 1956) with a Principal Component Analysis, to divide the parental lines into groups sharing similar genetic control for the traits studied. We found that the two main groups, defined according to their genetic control of node of first flower, also differed for all the others characters and, in particular, did not reach the same levels of productivity. These results indicated that crosses within the group with the highest productivity, but between lines with differing development and architectural features, could be a good starting point for breeding high-yield pure lines.

Pisum sativum L. combining ability diallel cross principal component analysis selection criteria yield stability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arumingtyas, E.L. & I.C., Murfet, 1992. The genetic basis of early flowering in mutant line I/178. Pisum Genet 24: 32–36.Google Scholar
  2. Barber H.N., 1959. Physiological genetics of Pisum II. The genetics of photoperiodism and vernalization. Heredity 13: 33–60.Google Scholar
  3. Bourion, V., M. Duparque, I. Lejeune-Hénaut & N. Munier-Jolain, 2002. Criteria for selecting productive and stable pea cultivars. Euphytica, in press.Google Scholar
  4. Bourion, V., M. Duparque, N. Munier-Jolain & I. Lejeune-Hénaut, 1998. Genetic variability of development rates in Pea (Pisum sativum L.). Proc 3rd Eur Conf on Grain Legumes, Valladolid, pp. 192-193.Google Scholar
  5. Cousin, R., 1972. Etude de la précocité chez les pois par la méthode des croisements diallèles. Proc Eucarpia Conf on peas, Versailles, pp. 47-57.Google Scholar
  6. Denis, J.B., 1999. Biadditivity for square tables. Rapport technique 1999-1. Unité de Biométrie, INRA Versailles, 57 p.Google Scholar
  7. Dumoulin, V., B. Ney & G. Etévé, 1994. Variability of seed and plant development in pea. Crop Sci 34: 992–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duparque, M., I. Lejeune-Hénaut, G. Etévé & A. Vingere, 1995. Multilocal selection for low thousand seed weight in pea (P. sativum L.) Yield Potential and Plant Architecture. Proc 2nd Eur Conf on Grain Legumes, Copenhagen, pp. 212-213.Google Scholar
  9. Etévé, G. & M. Derieux, 1982. Variabilité de la durée de la phase végétative chez le Pois (Pisum sativum L.). Application à la sélection de types résistants à l'hiver et à la détermination de la date de semis. Agronomie 2: 813–817.Google Scholar
  10. Floyd, R.S. & I.C. Murfet, 1986. Branching in Pisum: effect of the flowering and the length genes. Pisum Newsl 18: 12–15.Google Scholar
  11. Griffing, B, 1956. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust J Biol Sci 9: 463–493.Google Scholar
  12. Gritton, E.T., 1975. Heterosis and combining ability in a diallel cross of peas. Crop Sci 15: 453–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hayman, B.I., 1954. The theory and analysis of diallel crosses. Genetics 39: 789–809.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lejeune-Hénaut, I., G. Fouilloux, M.J. Ambrose, V. Dumoulin & G. Etévé, 1992. Analysis of a 5-parent half diallel in dried pea (Pisum sativum L.). I. Seed yield heterosis. Agronomie 12: 545–550.Google Scholar
  15. Lejeune-Hénaut, I., V. Bourion, G. Etévé, E. Cunot, K. Delhaye, C. Desmyter, 1999. Floral initiation in field-grown forage peas is delayed to a greater extent by short photoperiods, than in other types of European varieties. Euphytica 109: 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Maurer, A.R., D.E. Jaffray & H.F. Fletcher, 1966. Response of peas to environment. Assessment of the morphological development of peas. Can J Plant Sci 46: 285–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moot, D.J. & D.L. McNeil, 1995. Yield components, harvest index and plant type in relation to yield differences in field pea genotypes. Euphytica 86: 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Murfet, I.C., 1971a. Flowering in Pisum: three distinct phenotypic classes determined by the interaction of a dominant early and a dominant late gene. Heredity 26: 243–257.Google Scholar
  19. Murfet, I.C., 1971b. Flowering in Pisum: a three-gene system. Heredity 27: 93–110.Google Scholar
  20. Murfet, I.C., 1973. Flowering in Pisum: Hr, a gene for high response to photoperiod. Heredity 31: 157–164.Google Scholar
  21. Murfet, I.C., 1975a. Flowering in Pisum: multiple alleles at the Lf locus. Heredity 35: 85–98.Google Scholar
  22. Murfet, I.C., 1975b. An obvious E/e segregation in long days. Pisum Newsl 7: 41–42.Google Scholar
  23. Murfet, I.C., 1975c. The effect of Hr on flowering time, senescence and yield. Pisum Newsl 7: 42–43.Google Scholar
  24. Murfet, I.C., 1982. Flowering in the garden pea: expression of gene Sn in the field and use of multiple characters to detect segregation. Crop Sci 22: 923–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Murfet, I.C., 1985. Pisum sativum. In: A.H. Halevy (Ed.), CRC Handbook of Flowering, Vol. IV, pp. 97–126. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  26. Murfet, I.C. & S.C. Cayser, 1989. Flowering in Pisum: separation genotypes Sn Hr, Sn hr and sn - on a lf E Dne backgroung. Pisum Newsl 21: 37–40.Google Scholar
  27. Murfet, I.C. & J.B. Reid, 1985. The control of flowering and internode length in Pisum. In: P.D. Hebblethwaite, M.C. Heath & T.C.K. Dawkins (Eds.), The Pea Crop: A Basis for Improvement, pp 67–80. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
  28. Ney, B. & O. Turc, 1993. Heat-unit-based description of the reproductive development of pea. Crop Sci 33: 510–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rowlands, D.G., 1964. Genetic control of flowering in Pisum sativum L. Genetica 35: 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sarawat, P., F.L. Stoddard, D.R. Marshall & S.M. Ali, 1994. Heterosis for yield and related characters in pea. Euphytica 80: 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. SAS Institute Inc., 1990. SAS/STAT User's guide. Version 6, 4th edition. Cary, NC, USA, pp. 893-997.Google Scholar
  32. Snoad, B. & A.E. Arthur, 1973a. Genetical studies of quantitative characters in peas. 1. A seven-parent diallel cross of cultivars. Euphytica 22: 327–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Snoad, B. & A.E. Arthur, 1973b. Genetical studies of quantitative characters in peas. 2. A six-parent diallel cross of cultivars and primitive forms. Euphytica 22: 510–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Truong, H.-H. & C. Duthion, 1993. Time of flowering of pea (Pisum sativum L.) as a function of leaf appearance rate and node of first flower. Ann Botany 72: 133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Watts, L.E., E. Stevenson & M.J. Crampton, 1970. Inheritance of flowering time in six pea cultivars (Pisum sativum L.). Euphytica 19: 405–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Weber, W.E., 1976. A 10-parent diallel for quantitative genetic studies in peas (Pisum sativum L.). Z Pflanzenzüchtg 77: 30–42.Google Scholar
  37. Weller, J.L., J.B. Reid, S.A. Taylor & I.C. Murfet, 1997. The genetic control of flowering in pea. Z Trends in Plant Sci 2: 412–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Virginie Bourion
    • 1
  • Guy Fouilloux
    • 1
  • Christine Le Signor
    • 2
  • Isabelle Lejeune-Hénaut
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut National de la Recherche AgronomiqueUnité de Génétique et d'Amélioration des PlantesEstrées-MonsFrance
  2. 2.Institut National de la Recherche AgronomiqueUnité de Génétique et d'Amélioration des PlantesDijon CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations